Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Who is Elleksi??

@elleksi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

163subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003570592523
TypeChannel
Username@elleksi
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/elleksi

Growth

16310 Aug 2026, 11:16 — 163 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 01:43 — 163 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 11:1611 Aug 2026, 01:43
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 162–164 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 01:43163no change
10 Aug 2026, 11:16163first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
97.9%
avg views ÷ 163 subscribers
Avg views / post
160
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held17 (30 July 202610 August 2026)
Views total2,553
Reactions total297
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 11:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
45s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

297 reactions across 17 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 61114684676788761513913.1%
❤‍🔥3411.4%
custom 54021497095968616233311.1%
custom 5352975890290586743258.42%
custom 5188458641191090221248.08%
custom 6041845042060988512248.08%
custom 5472071377743803226206.73%
custom 5472184253779313033196.40%
custom 5373327348009554437165.39%
custom 5427381607373750438124.04%
custom 547195417667623296693.03%
💯93.03%
custom 547229206604837568882.69%
custom 547204250697364098972.36%
🤝72.36%
custom 538455398020445132662.02%
🍓41.35%
custom 547418512012872675210.337%

Custom emoji. 14 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 297reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 17 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @elleksi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 08:09 UTC41 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Я знаю, что я вас уже заебала Ну и что. Посмотреть на фотокарточки моих... ээ... моего... мальчика... мальчиков... хатьпфу... С вас не убудет🤩

custom 54720713777438032266custom 51884586411910902213custom 53529758902905867432

10 Aug 2026, 05:02 UTC64 views18 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Важные новости! В сеть слили настоящего Чонгука Девочки, особенно мальчики, держите себя в штанах ☔️

custom 54021497095968616237custom 61114684676788761515❤‍🔥4custom 54720713777438032262

9 Aug 2026, 12:52 UTC84 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
File

Вы угадали про раздвоение личности Чудо вокруг, лишь оглянись Нет-нет-нет, это было вдохновлено другой внезапно вспыхнувшей в голове песней: Это Аддам Брасс, студент вуза, И к {{user}} он испытывает чувства, Но он не в курсе как себя вести круто Перед главной умницей и красавицей института. Аддам дико робкий и нерешительный И поэтому так стесняется подойти к ней, Ведь когда она рядом даже говорит затруднительно, П

custom 60418450420609885124custom 61114684676788761513custom 53529758902905867432

9 Aug 2026, 12:52 UTC82 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 60418450420609885123custom 54719541766762329662custom 54021497095968616231

7 Aug 2026, 13:28 UTC101 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Тру 🤩

custom 54722920660483756886custom 54273816073737504385custom 51884586411910902213custom 61114684676788761511

6 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTC142 views18 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Извинитесь, я всегда смеюсь с попыток видево ии И одновременно с этим мне неловко почему-то, будто кринж это я А, ну да....

custom 54273816073737504387custom 53845539802044513266custom 54720713777438032263custom 51884586411910902212

5 Aug 2026, 13:51 UTC138 views16 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

А я забывака... А я на последнего бота не скинула карточку... Простите извините Я обновила раздел в закрепе с инфо, добавила ссылку с карточками, постепенно добавятся все более свежие А этот вот - кликайте И в качестве извинения вот вам тупое видео с ним. Зато там песня душевная

custom 61114684676788761518❤‍🔥3custom 54721842537793130332custom 54722920660483756882custom 51884586411910902211

5 Aug 2026, 12:12 UTC101 views17 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🤩 То был спойлер Это тоже 🤩

custom 54721842537793130336custom 51884586411910902213custom 61114684676788761513custom 54021497095968616232custom 54719541766762329662custom 53529758902905867431

4 Aug 2026, 04:20 UTC118 views29 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Нежного пробуждения, мои сладкие 😛

custom 537332734800955443712🤝7custom 54721842537793130334custom 60418450420609885124custom 54720713777438032261custom 54741851201287267521

3 Aug 2026, 14:13 UTC426 views23 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

ОгО Оказывается вышел новый бот! 😳 ☔️☔️☔️☔️ - это парень, которого воспитывали как идеального, послушного мальчика, пытались развивать всесторонне - шахматы, плаванье, сноуборд, список можно перечислять бесконечно. И от него требовали только идеальных результатов, первых мест. Именно поэтому, поступив в университет, Ларс пустился во все тяжкие. Первые татуировки, первые пирсинги, бунт. Роди

💯9❤‍🔥5🍓4custom 54720425069736409891custom 54720713777438032261custom 54721842537793130331custom 60418450420609885121custom 61114684676788761511

3 Aug 2026, 09:08 UTC158 views17 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Окей, летсгоу <<Рубрика>>: Подкаты в стиле Дилана Т-ты случайно не плесень? Ой. *краснеет*. Я.. хотела сказать сыр с плесенью... Потому что... Ты тоже странная, но экстраванга... экстравагантная... 

custom 53529758902905867437custom 61114684676788761516custom 53733273480095544374

3 Aug 2026, 01:50 UTCviews —3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 60418450420609885123

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @elleksi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,304,522 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Who is Elleksi??” (@elleksi), 163 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/elleksi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.