Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Элита Большого Тенниса

@elitetennis2

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

14,852subscribers

+60 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001214046257
TypeChannel
Username@elitetennis2
Description🎾 Здесь любят теннис 📩 Коммерческие предложения: @aruttns 🚔 Контент, разбан: @LCaplan 💬 Чат: https://t.me/+lpPYUqz5LWhlMTIy
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/elitetennis2

Growth

14,79214,85214,8226 August 2026 — 14,792 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,792 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,796 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,813 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,807 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,841 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,848 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,842 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,852 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 8 days, net +60. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,783–14,861 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 08:5714,852+10
13 Aug 2026, 00:3814,842-6
11 Aug 2026, 23:5614,848+7
9 Aug 2026, 19:0114,841+34
8 Aug 2026, 20:1714,807-6
7 Aug 2026, 17:3114,813+17
6 Aug 2026, 16:0614,796+4
6 Aug 2026, 04:4514,792no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:3714,792first reading

Engagement

105 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
38.4%
avg views ÷ 14,852 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,700
105 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.66%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
105
of 105 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held105 (4 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total598,810
Reactions total21,901
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 08:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,760
Videos
35
Links
756

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
13s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

20,060 reactions across 98 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6,31131.5%
🔥4,04020.1%
🤣1,9179.56%
😁1,4617.28%
😢1,4217.08%
👍1,3206.58%
😭6363.17%
👏3141.57%
❤‍🔥3081.54%
😱2521.26%
😍2411.20%
🎉2341.17%
💘2221.11%
🏆2071.03%
💊1880.937%
🙏1840.917%
👎1670.833%
🤯1420.708%
👀1140.568%
💔810.404%
12 further kinds3001.50%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 105 of the 105 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21,901reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 105 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 105 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @elitetennis2. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 105 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 06:26 UTC≈2,280 views109 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🇺🇸 Легендарные сестры Уильямс узнали соперниц в Цинциннати в парном разряде На старте домашнего «тысячника» американский тандем померится силами с дуэтом Костюк/Стернс 🍿 Серена и Винус не играли в паре с US Open-22, где уступили в первом круге чешкам Луции Градецкой и Линде Носковой! @elitetennis2

78🤣17🔥8🏆3💅2😱1

15 Aug 2026, 04:15 UTC≈3,050 views60 reactionsread 15 August 2026

​​РЕЗУЛЬТАТЫ ВТОРОГО ИГРОВОГО ДНЯ В ЦИНЦИННАТИ🎾 🇦🇷 Баес 1:6 6:3 6:4 🇧🇬 Димитров 🇺🇸 Микельсен 6:4 6:4 🇳🇱 де Йонг ⚡️🇺🇸 Ковачевич 5:7 6:3 7:6 🇷🇺 Хачанов 🇬🇷 Циципас 7:6 7:5 🇫🇷 Ройе 🇵🇹 Фария 6:3 6:2 🇺🇸 Бруксби 🇵🇱 Хуркач 6:2 6:4 🇯🇵 Симабукуро 🇮🇹 Берреттини 3:6 6:1 6:4 🇫🇷 Дроге 🇵🇹 Боржеш 5:7 7:6 7:6 🇦🇺 Коккинакис 🇪🇸 Мерида 3:6 6:1 6:1 🇭🇷 Чилич 🇦🇺 Дакворт 7:5 7:6 🇺🇸 Вулф 🇮🇹 Сонего 6:3 6:3 🇨🇳 Цзюньчэн 🇳🇱 ван де Зандсхулп 6:4

46👍7😁6🌚1

15 Aug 2026, 03:48 UTC≈3,280 views192 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

ХАЧАНОВ В ГЛУБОКОМ КРИЗИСЕ 😢 В первом раунде Цинциннати №39 Карен Хачанов на тай-брейке решающей партии уступил хозяину кортов Александару Ковачевичу со счётом 7:5 3:6 6:7(2)! Таким образом, россиянин потерпел четвёртое поражение подряд 😔 Далее американец встретится со своим соотечественником и финалистом Монреаля Брэндоном Накашимой 🔜 @elitetennis2

🤣96😢835💔2🤔2👀1🤯1😱1

14 Aug 2026, 19:10 UTC≈4,740 views197 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Соболенко не намерена утрачивать лидерство в рейтинге WTA 😏 — Мне нравится, когда у меня мишень на спине. Мне нравится видеть, как молодое поколение смотрит на меня и вдохновляется. Но, мне кажется, они будут вдохновляться, даже если я немного опущусь в рейтинге. Надеюсь, этого никогда не произойдет. Главное —сосредоточиться на себе и своем развитии как теннисистки и как человека. Тогда рейтинг действительно не имее

127💊32🏆17🙏10😁8💘2🤬1

14 Aug 2026, 17:03 UTC≈4,880 views189 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Теннисисты, выигравшие канадский «Мастерс» без потери партий: 🇦🇺 Патрик Рафтер (1998) 🇷🇸 Новак Джокович (2016) 🇺🇸 Бен Шелтон (2026) Австралиец и серб впоследствии в этом же сезоне дошли до финала US Open - получится ли у американца сделать то же самое? @elitetennis2

132🏆27🙏12👀9👎4👍3🔥2

14 Aug 2026, 15:16 UTC≈4,940 views134 reactionsread 15 August 2026

​Новак Джокович готов к «Мастерсу» в Цинциннати 🔥 — Перед US Open я хотел сыграть хотя бы один турнир. После Уимблдона я нигде не выступал, но организм отреагировал довольно хорошо. За последние два года я ещё ни разу не чувствовал себя настолько хорошо после «Шлема». После каждого другого ТБШ в этот период у меня были те или иные проблемы со здоровьем разной степени серьёзности. А на этот раз я был здоров и действ

102🔥21🙏9😁2

14 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC≈4,860 views76 reactionsread 15 August 2026

​ЦИНЦИННАТИ. РАСПИСАНИЕ ВТОРОГО ИГРОВОГО ДНЯ 🎾 P&G Stadium Court 18:00 🇨🇿 Сара Бейлек - 🇨🇿 Каролина Плишкова 19:30 🇧🇬 Григор Димитров - 🇦🇷 Себастьян Баес 21:00 🇺🇸 Алекс Микельсен - 🇳🇱 Йеспер де Йонг 02:00 🇺🇸 Слоан Стивенс - 🇦🇹 Синья Краус 03:30 🇺🇸 Александар Ковачевич - 🇷🇺 Карен Хачанов Grandstand 18:00 🇬🇷 Стефанос Циципас - 🇫🇷 Валентин Ройе 20:00 🇺🇸 Винус Уильямс - 🇨🇴 Эмилиана Аранго 21:30 🇺🇸 Алисия Паркс - 🇨🇭 Вик

52👍14🔥5🙏5

14 Aug 2026, 11:44 UTC≈4,490 views20 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🎾 РОЗЫГРЫШ ОТ VTENNISE Разыгрываем сразу пять призов! 🥇 Главный приз — стильный теннисный рюкзак Wilson Roland Garros. 🎁 Ещё четыре победителя получат по банке теннисных мячей Tennis Technology Acvilon. Условия участия: — подписаться на @vtennise — подписаться на @vtennise_news — нажать кнопку «Участвую!» под этим постом И всё! Итоги подведём 31 августа в 12:00 по московскому времени. Удачи! 🍀

18🌚1👎1

14 Aug 2026, 09:33 UTC≈5,180 views257 reactionsread 15 August 2026

1 сентября Гаэлю Монфису исполнится 40 лет 👍 @elitetennis2

🔥19937❤‍🔥14🍾61

14 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTC≈5,320 views193 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Брэндон Накашима рассмешил Бена Шелтона и всю публику канадского «Мастерса» 😂 «Если честно, мне в Монреале нравится больше, чем в Торонто […] К сожалению, в следующем году придётся вернуться в Торонто, но я с нетерпением жду возвращения сюда через два года». Болельщики в Торонто в 2027: 🤬🤬🤬 @elitetennis2

😁128🤣52🔥93🤯1

14 Aug 2026, 07:53 UTC≈5,470 views156 reactionsread 15 August 2026

​Изменения в рейтингах топ-10 WTA и АТР 1. 🇮🇹 Янник Синнер – 13,450 2. 🇪🇸 Карлос Алькарас – 8,160 3. 🇩🇪 Александр Зверев – 8,090 4. 🇨🇦 Феликс Оже-Альяссим – 4,740 5. 🇷🇸 Новак Джокович – 3,760 6. 🇺🇸 Бен Шелтон – 3,670 (+4) 7. 🇷🇺 Даниил Медведев – 3,580 (-1) 8. 🇦🇺 Алекс де Минор – 3,560 (-1) 9. 🇺🇸 Тейлор Фриц – 3,375 (-1) 10. 🇮🇹 Флавио Коболли – 3,330 (-1) 1. 🇧🇾 Арина Соболенко – 8,670 2. 🇰🇿 Елена Рыбакина – 8,316 3.

🔥10434👍18

14 Aug 2026, 05:54 UTC≈5,490 views97 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

РЕЗУЛЬТАТЫ ПРОШЕДШЕГО ИГРОВОГО ДНЯ 🎾 Торонто 🇵🇱 Швёнтек 6:2 6:3 🇰🇿 Рыбакина Монреаль 🇺🇸 Шелтон 6:3 7:6 🇺🇸 Накашима Цинциннати ⚡️🇪🇸 Ландалусе 6:3 7:5 🇬🇧 Дрейпер 🇦🇺 Хиджиката 2:6 7:6 6:3 🇫🇷 Монфис 🇬🇧 Норри 3:6 6:1 6:4 🇭🇷 Прижмич 🇨🇦 Шаповалов 6:1 6:4 🇫🇷 Маннарино 🇮🇹 Беллуччи 7:6 7:6 🇺🇸 Свайда 🇦🇷 Тиранте 7:6 6:7 7:6 🇬🇧 Чоински 🇫🇷 Атман 3:1/ отказ 🇭🇺 Фучович 🇦🇷 Навоне 6:3 7:6 🇧🇪 Коллиньон 🇩🇪 Штруфф 7:6 2:6 6:3 🇦🇷 Бурру

🎉59👍1711🏆6🔥4

Showing the 12 most recent of 105 posts we hold for @elitetennis2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@elitetennis2 edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
13 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 30,607 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Элита Большого Тенниса” (@elitetennis2), 14,852 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/elitetennis2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.