Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Бол-бой о теннисе | ATP | WTA

Channel

Бол-бой о теннисе | ATP | WTA

@ballboy_tennis

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

16,422subscribers

+1,086 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002685147874
TypeChannel
Username@ballboy_tennis
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ballboy_tennis

Growth

15,26816,42215,8456 August 2026 — 15,336 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,332 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,320 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,307 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,300 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,281 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,268 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,415 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,580 subscribers15 August 2026 — 16,087 subscribers16 August 2026 — 16,422 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 11 days, net +1,086. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,095–16,595 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 20:0516,422+335
15 Aug 2026, 07:3816,087+507
13 Aug 2026, 23:2815,580+165
12 Aug 2026, 18:0715,415+147
11 Aug 2026, 15:0415,268-13
10 Aug 2026, 17:5315,281-19
9 Aug 2026, 16:0215,300-7
8 Aug 2026, 17:3415,307-13
7 Aug 2026, 14:5315,320-12
6 Aug 2026, 17:2015,332-4
6 Aug 2026, 06:4915,336first reading

Engagement

55 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
51.6%
avg views ÷ 16,422 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,480
55 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.338%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
55
of 55 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held55 (1 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total466,415
Reactions total1,577
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 17:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
50s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,482 reactions across 51 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
54837.0%
🔥33822.8%
💯15510.5%
🤣1117.49%
👍1087.29%
🤪906.07%
😭563.78%
🤝392.63%
🎉140.945%
👏70.472%
🤮60.405%
🏆30.202%
👌30.202%
🥰30.202%
🙏10.067%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 55 of the 55 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,577reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 16:19 UTC≈2,560 views21 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Прикольно, Медведев не вывозит матчи с Тьеном, поэтому решил изучить игрока изнутри, так сказать. Ну и сестер Уильямс будет интересно глянуть. Мы в MAX

🤣10🔥83

15 Aug 2026, 08:38 UTC≈2,320 views25 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Невероятный эпизод в конце вчерашнего матча Боржеш - Коккинакис. В конце финального тая австралиец получает повреждение. Встать он смог только с помощью медицинского персонала. Однако Танаси принимает решение доиграть оставшееся очко! Конечно, матч в итоге проигран, но упорство Коккинакиса абсолютно точно поражает. Мы в MAX

14👍7🔥4

15 Aug 2026, 05:33 UTC≈9,730 views36 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Хачанов вылетел на старте Цинциннати. Ужас. Россиянин не справился с Ковачивечем в трех сетах - 7:5, 3:6, 6:7. Комментариев не будет, потому что мы все прекрасно понимаем. Но и да, от Карена никаких позитивных новостей в этом сезоне я и не жду. Зато в таком же триллере Люда Самсонова прошла-таки Путинцеву - 7:5, 5:7, 7:5. Девочки рубились на корте три часа! Мы в MAX

😭20💯86🥰1🙏1

14 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTC≈9,440 views13 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Продолжаю просмотр шоу сбитых летчиков. Сегодня на ужин был Циципас. Кстати, Стеф достаточно уверенно закрыл Ройе в первом круге Цинциннати (если не считать отрезок, как он с 5:2 во втором сете чуть не улетел на тай). Конечно, француз совсем не Ландалусе, но и Дрейпер вчера был гораздо слабее Цици. Грек очень недурно подготовился к топовым турнирам на харде. Он уверенно действовал с Ройе, колотил-молотил по линиям,

7🔥3🤝3

14 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTC≈2,480 views26 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

У Саши Бублика просто потрясающая ракетка от Diadem Sports. Выглядит довольным. Ждем новых хороших результатов от Бубло! Мы в MAX

🔥147💯5

14 Aug 2026, 13:38 UTC≈9,610 views14 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🎾 РОЗЫГРЫШ ОТ VTENNISE Разыгрываем сразу пять призов! 🥇 Главный приз — стильный теннисный рюкзак Wilson Roland Garros. 🎁 Ещё четыре победителя получат по банке теннисных мячей Tennis Technology Acvilon. Условия участия: — подписаться на @vtennise — подписаться на @vtennise_news — нажать кнопку «Участвую!» под этим постом И всё! Итоги подведём 31 августа в 12:00 по московскому времени. Удачи! 🍀

🔥84👍2

14 Aug 2026, 13:18 UTC≈9,690 views22 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

А ведь Ходар очень близок к десятке рейтинга! Я уж не говорю про то, что парень имеет все шансы попасть на Итоговый турнир. Мы в MAX

🔥126💯4

14 Aug 2026, 10:40 UTC≈9,640 views45 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Ига, если ты в заложниках у собачки, подай знак. А вообще, это Элвей - известный пес, символ турнира. Говорят, он вообще питомец завхоза Мастерса. Мы в MAX

27🤣15🤝3

14 Aug 2026, 07:37 UTC≈9,920 views38 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Невероятно интересное решение от Дани, хоть и мало понимания, почему так. Думаю, Медведев понял, что нужен русскоязычный тренер, лучше драйвит, понимает. Но почему именно Голубев? Вопрос много, ответов мало. Решение выглядит странновато, однако Даня явно внутри ситуации знает лучше нас, что ему нужно. Ждем ближайших стартов! Мы в MAX

💯20🤪114👌3

14 Aug 2026, 02:13 UTC≈3,240 views35 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

ШЕЛТОН И ШВЕНТЕК - ПОБЕДИТЕЛИ КАНАДСКИХ МАСТЕРСОВ Что же, поздравляю обоих! Финалы закончились в двух партиях, притом что женский матч по накалу был слабее мужского. Впрочем, Брендану и Лене все равно спасибо за борьбу на турнирах. Ига в целом провела сильный Мастерс, даже в какой-то степени удивительно. Но кто бы мог подумать, что Шелтон защитит канадские очки? Для меня это в любом случае неожиданно. Но ребята нах

🔥1711👏5💯2

13 Aug 2026, 17:23 UTC740 views28 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Посмотрел минут 40 матч Дрейпера и Ландалусе. Понял, что это было ужасно. Спасибо, Цинциннати. Испанец действовал по ситуации, а вот Джек имел все шансы перевести игру хотя бы в три сета, но его будто бы подменили в последнее время. Понятно, что травма, восстановление, но реакция, подача, розыгрыши - все на крайне посредственном уровне. В любом случае, желаю британцу обрести себя к следующему сезону, однако ряд вещ

12🔥9🤪5😭2

13 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC721 views17 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Пфф, Лоре, это пустяки. Я до 9 утра успел покормить сына, еще поспать час, затем позавтракать и что-то посмотреть из ночных матчей. Кстати, хотелось бы побольше матчей увидеть с Музетти! Но для этого надо хотя бы вновь проходить больше 1-2 кругов на турнирах. Мы в MAX

6🤣6🤮4🤝1

Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @ballboy_tennis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 27,180 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Бол-бой о теннисе | ATP | WTA” (@ballboy_tennis), 16,422 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ballboy_tennis.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.