in 2-3days we will do many events too

Channel
ELITE MAFIAS
@elitemafias
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
127subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003788149976 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @elitemafias @textingpaglu |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 28 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/elitemafias |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:11 | 127 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:11 | 126 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 126 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 127 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:47 | 127 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 28 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 54.3%
- avg views ÷ 127 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 69.0
- 2 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 2
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (28 May 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 138 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 02:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2m 42s
- Average length
- 15s
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
365 reactions across 18 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 119 | 32.6% | |
| 😭 | 52 | 14.2% | |
| custom 5370712413005945913 | 31 | 8.49% | |
| custom 6113792783720391645 | 22 | 6.03% | |
| custom 5931464773395815552 | 19 | 5.21% | |
| ❤🔥 | 18 | 4.93% | |
| custom 5370971163310693562 | 14 | 3.84% | |
| custom 5465263910414195580 | 13 | 3.56% | |
| custom 5256088866976194431 | 11 | 3.01% | |
| custom 6113952414769880422 | 11 | 3.01% | |
| custom 6116438273121329150 | 10 | 2.74% | |
| 💘 | 9 | 2.47% | |
| custom 5931692110309759294 | 6 | 1.64% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 1.37% | |
| custom 5370646412243510708 | 4 | 1.10% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 1.10% | |
| 🆒 | 4 | 1.10% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 1.10% | |
| custom 6005551619222018344 | 3 | 0.822% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 0.822% | |
| 2 further kinds | 3 | 0.822% |
Custom emoji. 11 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 365reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 61
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 6
- of 20 we hold a reading for · 30%
- Most on one post
- 50
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @elitemafias. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 May 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Hello everyone, It's been a long time so now we're ready to revive this channel, • we're posting daily memes • exciting new events, and high activity Don't forgot to on your notifications ❤️
😭
😭16🤣10🆒4
For real 😭
🤣14
The insane level of fun 😂💸
custom 537097116331069356210custom 59314647733958155522🔥1
Me after seeing new nibba nibbi 🤣
🤣19custom 53709711633106935621
💥 KILL THE MODS EVENT — WINNER ANNOUNCEMENT 💥 💸Last Mod Standing: @Yoichi Winner @blurrheart 🏆
custom 61139524147698804226custom 61137927837203916454
💸 Kill the Mod's Event 💸 How it works: 💥 • Every round, a poll will be posted with the names of all surviving Mods of @texting • You vote for the Mod you want to "kill." • The Mod with the highest votes at the end of the round is eliminated! We repeat this until only ONE Mod remains standing. • Then Last surviving Mod will select one member from the voter's on the basis of a good member in texting Note - The sel…
custom 525608886697619443111custom 59316921103097592946custom 59314647733958155524
Jo us time on the uni ko smjh ayga🤣
🤣12😭5
@Drrip घोटाले का हुआ पर्दाफाश, भ्रष्ट और लालची नेता 'भव्य' की खुली पोल।"🚨 Note - we have just made for entertainment purpose ( just a meme ) यह केवल मनोरंजन के लिए बनाया गया है कृप्या इसे दिल पर न ले News covered by @Elitemafias
custom 537071241300594591321custom 53706464122435107084custom 53709711633106935623custom 61137927837203916452❤1
https://t.me/EliteXEvent/76 @DeluluCandle @preeyay Won with the highest 90% 💗
custom 546526391041419558013custom 53707124130059459137custom 60055516192220183442custom 59314647733958155521
❤️ /Ship Event by @EliteMafias ⭐️ On the occasion of Best Friends Day — prove your duo bond ⭐️💗 •🫀 Duo Entry Only •🗯 Must Join Texting •⭐️ Must be a Member of @Elitemafias 🏆 First Duo to Get Highest Ship % Wins Note - We will drop a Link of a Group the duo will do there /ship, higher one wins 💕 💸 Prize Pool: ₹1000 ⏰ Timing: Today at 9 PM Get ready with your duo 💕
💘9custom 53707124130059459133❤1custom 54517452431519973821custom 61164382731213291501
Signed ...
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @elitemafias. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,018,486 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ELITE MAFIAS” (@elitemafias), 127 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/elitemafias.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.