Channel
@drrip
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
416subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003821966554 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @drrip |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 18 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/drrip |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:33 | 416 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:47 | 416 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (18 June 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,314 |
| Reactions total | 315 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 05:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
542 reactions across 20 posts, in 39 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5845830268044185765 | 86 | 15.9% | |
| custom 5370953476635368811 | 71 | 13.1% | |
| custom 6190672698318790614 | 42 | 7.75% | |
| custom 5429329916208379953 | 41 | 7.56% | |
| custom 5256088866976194431 | 34 | 6.27% | |
| custom 5246794802560774143 | 28 | 5.17% | |
| custom 6105028778398850131 | 27 | 4.98% | |
| custom 6303226486723716305 | 19 | 3.51% | |
| custom 5767301966472420534 | 18 | 3.32% | |
| custom 6210911318656951420 | 17 | 3.14% | |
| 😭 | 17 | 3.14% | |
| custom 6325473957755488220 | 15 | 2.77% | |
| custom 6275861201381498406 | 14 | 2.58% | |
| custom 6334517582627866359 | 11 | 2.03% | |
| ❤ | 11 | 2.03% | |
| 💅 | 10 | 1.85% | |
| 👻 | 9 | 1.66% | |
| 🤣 | 8 | 1.48% | |
| custom 6104976392682740465 | 7 | 1.29% | |
| 🏆 | 6 | 1.11% | |
| 19 further kinds | 51 | 9.41% |
Custom emoji. 14 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 542reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Bro stop coming and saying to us we are competing with that shit Please.
custom 619067269831879061412custom 52467948025607741435custom 63032264867237163054custom 61049763926827404652custom 61050287783988501312❤1👻1😇1
1810 Weekly
custom 610502877839885013111custom 54293299162083799533custom 61906726983187906143custom 52467948025607741432custom 62109113186569514202👻1💅1custom 61049763926827404651
967 Weekly
custom 53709534766353688119custom 54293299162083799536👍2👻2custom 61050287783988501312😈1😭1custom 61049763926827404651
@hoted in the past one week
custom 630322648672371630515custom 61050287783988501315custom 52467948025607741434custom 61906726983187906143❤2custom 61049763926827404652💅1
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 537095347663536881113custom 54293299162083799535😭3custom 62109113186569514202😇1
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 542932991620837995312😭5custom 53709534766353688115💅1custom 62109113186569514201
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 537095347663536881113custom 54293299162083799535😭4custom 62109113186569514201
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 537095347663536881113custom 54293299162083799535💅4custom 62109113186569514202
Does anyone know this guy? People saying he miss me a lot
custom 537095347663536881112custom 61906726983187906146😭3custom 54293299162083799533custom 62109113186569514201
Han bhai mai Jinda hu ab aap bacho wale gc se kue ke mendak jaise rahoge toh kaise pata lagega aapko sir
custom 619067269831879061413custom 53709534766353688116custom 61050287783988501314custom 54293299162083799532custom 61049763926827404651
Posted without readable text
custom 627586120138149840614custom 52467948025607741434custom 61050287783988501313custom 63254739577554882203❤1🏆1👍1custom 58458302680441857651
Signed Hoted
@hoted
custom 584583026804418576512🤣8🤪3custom 63345175826278663593❤2👻1💅1😈1
Signed Hoted
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @drrip. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 442,242 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DRRIP” (@drrip), 416 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drrip.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.