Channel
💎 1% ELITES FREE 🎖
@elite11team
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
395subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 27 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002078381129 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @elite11team |
| Description | When margin calls, decline |
| First recorded | 13 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| On Telegram | t.me/elite11team |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Oct 2026, 04:08 | 395 | no change |
| 8 Oct 2026, 00:17 | 395 | -1 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 07:55 | 396 | -2 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 20:37 | 398 | -2 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 21:17 | 400 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:15 | 403 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Vantage_ForexSignals · 32,048
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 5 September 2026
@GoldClubHouseOfficial · 24,586
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 14 September 2026
@The_innercircle_trade · 17,073
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 27 August 2026
@xesnipereducation · 21,463
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 25 September 2026
@Boby24Bookmap · 19,221
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 2 October 2026
@layneforex1 · 45,105
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 28 August 2026
@Acetrades_challenge · 27,018
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 11 September 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“💎 1% ELITES FREE 🎖” (@elite11team), 395 subscribers as measured 13 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/elite11team.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.