Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ryumochnaya elish

@elishapes

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry

186subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001675406820
TypeChannel
Username@elishapes
DescriptionElish, преподаватель и танцор стилей cutting shapes, shuffle dance. 17:00 Сб м. Невский проспект 20:00 Вт м. Девяткино ВК: https://vk.ru/ELISHapes
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/elishapes

Growth

1868 Aug 2026, 10:54 — 186 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 12:16 — 186 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 10:548 Aug 2026, 12:16
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 185–187 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 12:16186no change
8 Aug 2026, 10:54186first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 21 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
55.6%
avg views ÷ 186 subscribers
Avg views / post
103
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
22.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held13 (21 February 20267 August 2026)
Views total310
Reactions total70
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 12:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
550
Videos
244
Links
12

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 08s
Average length
26s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

266 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥6424.1%
5420.3%
🥰4918.4%
custom 5341355658702758871249.02%
custom 5246800480507542323228.27%
custom 5246777987763829515197.14%
custom 5411479817377834490155.64%
custom 5361819743349141707124.51%
custom 547436897908871792672.63%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 266reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 21 February 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
31
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 13 we hold a reading for · 92%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @elishapes. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 February 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 20:42 UTC60 views19 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Тренер 💕 @nikshapes

10🥰7🔥2

2 Aug 2026, 17:23 UTC129 views21 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Video

Сильная аура — слабые доли Сегодня компенсирую долгое молчание видосиками

🔥12🥰54

2 Aug 2026, 09:36 UTC121 views30 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video

@nikshapes 🤩 🎦@mil_i_amm

🔥14🥰97

10 Jul 2026, 17:20 UTC272 views18 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Тренер здорового человека / тренер курильщика

10🔥4🥰4

9 Jul 2026, 16:12 UTC227 views21 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @kineticflowshufflePhoto

🕺Kinetic Flow Shuffle на VK Fest 2026 🌐 18–19 июля встречаемся на ВДНХ - на одном из самых масштабных фестивалей этого лета! 😎 VK Fest - это концерты, интерактивные зоны, мастер-классы и тысячи людей, готовых открывать для себя что-то новое. И в этом году Kinetic Flow Shuffle станет частью этого большого события Мы готовим собственную площадку, где в течение двух дней будем знакомить гостей фестиваля с миром Cuttin

🥰8🔥76

11 Jun 2026, 09:36 UTC393 views23 reactions6 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Не прошло еще ни дня, когда бы у меня не спросили, чем так вкусно пахнет от меня. Это одни из любимейших комплиментов. Я решила публиковать сюда ароматы, что попадают в сердечко. Сегодня герой дня eau duelle Diptique. Я свое знакомство с брендом начала не так давно, тк Россию они покинули, послушать негде, на рандеву отливантов нет, а на вторичке миллион подделок. Обычно на полках у меня большие флаконы, но здесь мн

11🥰7🔥5

16 May 2026, 17:01 UTC549 views33 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026

Сегодня прошли вторые баттлы Round One. В прошлом году я практически стала инициатором организации этого мероприятия. Бессонные ночи, куча работы, но это свершилось. Мы с командой сделали это. В этом году сорвалась повторить успех, но не осилила. Тяжелая болезнь и недавняя смерть близкого человека выбивали последний год землю из-под ног. Но как же я счастлива, что нашлись люди, которым хватило сил подхватить этот про

custom 541147981737783449015custom 524680048050754232310custom 52467779877638295156custom 54743689790887179262

1 May 2026, 14:30 UTC618 views24 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Video

Пытаемся вернуться в строй

custom 524680048050754232312custom 52467779877638295157custom 53413556587027588715

16 Mar 2026, 09:07 UTC815 views19 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Еще пару дней назад у меня на столе стоял настоящий «арт-объект» парфюмерной мысли. 1889 Moulin rouge Histoires de parfums. Это не просто парфюм, это ольфакторная театральная постановка. Парфюмеры доходят до того, что уже не пытаются украшать наши тела ароматами, они делают из нас главных героев сцен и сюжетов. И решает за тебя, какой сюжет ты будешь проживать, твоя кожа. История и концепция: О чем этот аромат? Дже

custom 534135565870275887113custom 52467779877638295156

3 Mar 2026, 06:23 UTC608 views6 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @killpro_sslVideo

⚔️ Round 2 Fight ⚔️ 🇷🇺 Fast1k vs 🇷🇺 StarKiller #shuffle #killpro #ssl8

custom 53413556587027588716

21 Feb 2026, 13:01 UTC718 views17 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вся прелесть аренды залов в Питере

custom 536181974334914170712custom 54743689790887179265

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @elishapes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ryumochnaya elish” (@elishapes), 186 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/elishapes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.