.

Channel
Mzta catz ALPHA WATCHOOR
@eligiblespace
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
753subscribers
-75 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002463718957 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @eligiblespace |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/eligiblespace |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:45 | 753 | -75 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:30 | 828 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:06 | 828 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 5 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
10 reactions across 8 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 10 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 5 February 2026 to 3 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Why #TONSO actually feels different 🤔 Because for once, creators and users are winning together. No pointless grinding. No vague promises. Just real token supplies, real reward pools, and rewards that actually make sense. Most campaigns come with minimal vesting, and claim dates are clear — either fixed drops (like Jan 26) or fully scheduled for Q1 2026. No guessing games. 🏆 TONSO campaigns I’m watching right now …
❤1
The #TONSO Network is picking up serious momentum and attention is starting to convert. • 8,000+ Telegram creators already onboard • 47,000+ active users in January alone • 30,000+ Telegram channels indexed • 50M+ total followers reached worldwide, across all languages TONSO is quietly reshaping Telegram into a true Attention Economy. Stay active, earn BUZZ, and unlock real rewards. 🔥 Live Tonso Campaigns Right N…
❤2
#TonsoAI Tonso is scaling quietly, but the numbers say everything. Over 8,000 Telegram creators have already joined, with 47,000+ active users in January alone. The network is now indexing more than 30,000 Telegram channels, reaching a combined audience of 50M+ followers worldwide across all languages. Staying active on Tonso truly pays off. Current live TonsoAI campaigns: SolsticeFi (@solsticefi) Fast swaps, au…
❤1
Read this! Tokenization alone is never the endgame. Tokenized stocks that just sit idle do not change finance. The real deal here is making them productive to earning yield. Plus being usable as collateral within structured risk frameworks. With nearly $200M TVL, @multiplifi is positioning itself as the yield and collateral layer for tokenized equities. The NYSE exploring stock tokenization confirms where markets…
❤1
Vault777 is the best because it's the ONLY fully onchain casino on Arbitrum that actually delivers true decentralization. No custody, your funds never leave your wallet, Chainlink VRF gives provably fair results anyone can verify onchain, instant payouts with basically zero fees! No more 'pending withdrawal' excuses, no shady operators freezing accounts, no hidden RNG just transparent smart contracts, sub second Ar…
❤2
UPDATE: @usevault777 Free to participate $VAULT777 $50,000 Price Prediction Event Vault777 is rewarding the Top 100 users with a share of $50,000 and it’s still early to join. How to position (free): -- go to: https://markets.vault777.com/r/bina_Kyung Sign in → Connect X (Twitter) Get $10,000 in virtual funds Make your price predictions Rewards: $500 – $2,000 for Top 100 Ends Feb 20 (Mainnet launch) No mone…
❤1
Solana just got $1.3B more stablecoins in one week. that usually means people are getting ready to use their money, not just hold it. this is good for @solstice_TG because USX isn’t just sitting in wallets, it actually earns yield and gets used on Solana. when more stablecoins come in, protocols that do something useful with them benefit the most.
❤1
what will be the function of $SLX? actually pretty big - it’ll connect the whole Solstice Finance economy and decide whether the system survives on real demand or not $SLX won’t be printed endlessly. new tokens appear only when TVL grows - the more liquidity in USX, the more emissions get unlocked. if the market stalls, issuance stops. supply moves together with adoption the first ones to receive it aren’t funds, …
❤1
the SLX launch will be interesting since Solstice didn’t partner with any VCs when a startup looks for funding, VC invests millions and takes a huge chunk of tokens at a cheap price. projects like a16z join the seed round, buy tokens cheap, and then wait for the listing - when it happens, they profit 1000x or more. that’s their main source of income solstice chose a different model Deus X fully funded the protocol …
@Solstice_TG terms explained like you’re 7 - SLX tokenomics in your yard there are 1B SLX tokens, like a huge pie that needs to be fairly cut between different yard tasks of Solstice 1) 50% - "playground and prizes" (Ecosystem incentives) these tokens are for those who: // launch new games and attractions // bring balls, jump ropes, and build monkey bars in the yard (protocols and integrations) // help keep the …
what you should especially value in a project is when it’s very active in interacting with the community that’s exactly what i value about solstice they actually do this in many different ways, but i’ve highlighted the main ones in my opinion // constant support if you post anything about USX, eUSX, new partnerships, your success earning flares, or basically anything related to solstice, there’s a very high chanc…
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @eligiblespace. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@eligiblespace named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mzta catz ALPHA WATCHOOR” (@eligiblespace), 753 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eligiblespace.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.