Channel
@elenagolden23
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
51subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002161969842 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @elenagolden23 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/elenagolden23 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:05 | 51 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:31 | 50 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:32 | 50 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 27 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (27 June 2026 – 30 July 2026) |
| Views total | 281 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
5 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Начало, конечно, немного сбивает с толку: слишком резкие переходы от пустыни к политическим разборкам. Но как только привыкаешь к этому калейдоскопу, книга затягивает. Тут тебе и гробницы с тайнами, и дипломатические скандалы, и интриги, и даже элементы детектива (запах серы в особняке Мандорфа — явно неспроста). Очень напоминает «Дюну» по атмосфере: есть огромная империя, есть политика, есть мистика и древние угрозы…
❤2
"Дочь Тиамат" Нина Эмбер Дальше — резкий скачок во времени. Мы в Феодории, но с очень странным летоисчислением: «от Пленения Тиамат». Появляется наш главный герой — канцлер Альберт Мандорф. Сразу чувствуется, что это местная «звезда». Он из тех, кто не любит папарацци, живёт политикой и, кажется, всех считает врагами. Очень напоминает героев суровых политических драм: везде видит заговор, но при этом чертовски хариз…
❤1
Я переписывала сцены по многу раз. Текст менялся, герои оживали. И сейчас, оглядываясь назад, я понимаю: да, первая книга никогда не бывает идеальной. Но она — моя. Моя маленькая вселенная, моя гордость. И это настоящее счастье — держать в руках историю, которая родилась из твоей души. Писала я везде: в тетради за столом, на листах А4 карандашом, иногда уютно устроившись в кресле. Вдохновение приходило из книг — сов…
Вступление. С чего всё началось "На грани неба": Это был спонтанный порыв. Январь 2024 года. Я посмотрела в зеркало и вдруг поняла: мне нужно написать про мечту. Просто взять и сделать. Я достала тетрадь, нашла в интернете шаблоны «как красиво написать» и начала выводить первые строки. Я не думала о сюжете, не строила планов — я просто доверилась чувству. Но, как это часто бывает, история пошла своим путем. Она ста…
"Дочь Тиамат" Нина Эмбер По атмосфере начало книги напомнило Египет, гробницы, пески. И так до первой главы сложно было понять происходящее войска двигались до Имран. Была невыносимая жара, они искали укрытие где можно в прохладе побыть и как раз ночлег. Войска, Влад и Матей зашли в гробницу(святыня Феодолии) осмотреть. Затем сущность если я правильно поняла это Тиамат матерь Хаоса(демон) так вроде есть хвост, кист…
❤1
Небольшой типо отзыв, но скорее всего впечатление после прочитанного сразу. Спойлеры убрала(закрашены). Очень рада что книга понравилась😍 надеюсь напишет на подробный отзыв о книге. #награнинеба #впечатление
"На грани неба" Елена Голден #награнинеба@elenagolden23 #книга
"Проклятие Мортуорумов: королева, магистр и палач" Алина Кондратьева Ой, с третьей главы началось самое интересное! Вик-кот — это улёт! Представляю бедолагу, который карабкается по стенам, потому что боится Эвелину. И эти призрачные мальчики, которые хвастаются: «мне вспороли горло» и «меня отравили конфетами» — жутко и смешно. Я прямо видела эту сцену. Даллас — напыщенный фейри. Сначала лезет к Мирабелле, а она е…
Photo, posted without a caption
Одиночество отвечает взаимностью Лишь в тишине мы такие какие есть Без лишних специй Можем быть тихими как дно океана Или же быть весёлыми как лучик солнца Все зависит от нас самих И все же находясь в одиночестве нуждаемся в людях Чтоб обняли успокоили и поговорили по душам но нет Так не может быть Осознавать что лучшего собеседника чем ты попросту нет. Создала стих аж в 2024 году.
4 года в колледже — это фундамент. Дальше — надстройка, штукатурка и финишная отделка. Я иду в вуз за новыми знаниями, чтобы мои проекты стали не просто красивыми, а по-настоящему глубокими. Первый этап пройден, но главная стройка — впереди. Увидимся в универе! 🏛️📚
❤1
Страшная милота. Я не знала что у нас черепахи водятся😳
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @elenagolden23. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 219,139 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Елена Голден | Миры между строк” (@elenagolden23), 51 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/elenagolden23.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.