Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
5 measurements spanning 39 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 299–302 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 15:00
302
+2
7 Sept 2026, 19:01
300
+1
23 Aug 2026, 01:08
299
-1
8 Aug 2026, 08:02
300
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:50
300
first reading
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 7 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 06s
Average length
47s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
109 reactions across 9 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
36
33.0%
🔥
29
26.6%
❤
18
16.5%
👏
12
11.0%
😁
7
6.42%
🤝
3
2.75%
🍾
2
1.83%
⚡
1
0.917%
🤯
1
0.917%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 109 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 7 December 2025 to 20 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 12 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @elena_yakuba_urist. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 December 2025 to 20 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
С облегчением выдыхаем - ретроградный Меркурий наконец-то закончился!
Надеюсь, вы использовали это время для анализа, завершения старых дел и переосмысления планов. А теперь - пора двигаться вперед!
С пятницей! Пусть следующая неделя станет началом новой, успешной главы! ✨
Красноярец попытался отсудить у бывшей жены деньги, потраченные на проституток.
Он взял кредит на 2 млн рублей в браке и потребовал, чтобы экс-супруга выплачивала его вместе с ним. Но выяснилось, что средства шли не на семью: в телефоне нашли переписки, флирт и переводы по 40–60 тысяч рублей за интим-услуги
📢 Прямой эфир | 📲Наш MAX
Итак….задача)
У меня недавно было выиграно дело в суде апелляционной инстанции, прям горжусь этим делом. Хочу с вами поделиться этим результатом, но сначала хотелось бы узнать ваше мнение 😇
Значит:
Супруги, находясь в браке, подписали брачный договор, по условиям которого квартира, приобретенная в браке в ипотеку, в случае расторжения брака останется супруге. Супруг к ипотеке и квартире никакого отношения не имеет,…
Ребят, вот и я пришла к созданию канала в Мах….
Не понятно, что в итоге будет с телеграмм и не хотелось бы терять связь с каждым….
Делюсь ссылкой, подписывайтесь 🤗
Канал пока пустой))
https://max.ru/join/G9v4UXQz8wp1SQJSwKr8VEq3P_7RtYudG86iAHN01ls
## 😬 Когда раздел имущества выходит из-под контроля!
В Балашихе мужчина решил, что судья несправедливо отсудила его любимую машинку бывшей супруге. Реакция? Ну, скажем так, не самая адекватная – попытка вырвать документы и... укус судьи! 🙈
Да, вы не ослышались, укус! Видимо, аргументы закончились. 😅
Мораль сей басни такова:
Не согласны с решением суда? Обжалуйте! Это законный способ выразить свое недовольство.
Эм…
## Алименты: Часть от дохода или Твердая Сумма? Разбираемся! ⚖️
Друзья, привет! 👋 Давно не виделись, знаю! Завал по делам, да и личная жизнь бурлит – расскажу об этом позже 😉
Но я не могла больше тянуть с важной темой, которая волнует многих – алименты.
В этом видео я подробно разбираю два основных способа взыскания алиментов:
✅ В доле от дохода: Классический вариант, когда алименты рассчитываются как процент от з…
2025-й: Год, когда все сложилось 💫
Ребят, вот и подходит к концу 2025-й. Если честно, даже немного не верится, как быстро пролетело время! Но если оглянуться назад, становится понятно – это был год, который превзошел все мои ожидания.
2025 год стал годом настоящего карьерного взлета! Я не просто успешно вела свои дела, я достигла новых высот в профессиональном развитии. Завершила несколько действительно сложных кей…
⚡️Верховный Суд отменил судебные акты по делу Ларисы Долиной против Полины Лурье и принял новое решение об отказе в иске Долиной.
В иске Долиной отказано. В части выселения дело направлено на новое рассмотрение.
Полина Лурье победила и отстояла свою квартиру!
Для вынесения судебного акта Коллегии Верховного Суда потребовалось 32 минуты.
Судебная практика СКГД ВС РФ
Вчера посетили Сказочный музей «Особняк-Небылица» на Озерковском пер. в Москве
Я в восторге от него
Рекомендую посмотреть с детьми
👍11🔥5
Signed Елена Якуба
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @elena_yakuba_urist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Взыскал всю сумму оплаченных ипотечных платежей во время брака10%
Взыскал половину оплаченных платежей24%
Отказал супругу полностью66%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 7 December 2025 to 20 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Елена Якуба | АДВОКАТ” (@elena_yakuba_urist), 302 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/elena_yakuba_urist.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.