Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 7 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 17 comparable posts for this entry, running 14 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @Dolgoprudnyy2. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -1,102. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 50,906–52,338 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 10:24
51,071
-139
11 Aug 2026, 09:37
51,210
-96
10 Aug 2026, 11:22
51,306
-118
9 Aug 2026, 11:52
51,424
-237
8 Aug 2026, 14:24
51,661
-175
7 Aug 2026, 14:34
51,836
-276
6 Aug 2026, 11:41
52,112
-61
6 Aug 2026, 09:46
52,173
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.2%
avg views ÷ 51,071 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,710
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
20 (14 July 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
102,726
Reactions total
288
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 19:43 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,950
Videos
≈121
Links
≈615
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
288 reactions across 18 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👏
105
36.5%
🔥
94
32.6%
👍
87
30.2%
🤯
2
0.694%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 288reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
10.0%
2 of 20 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
1,240
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
5,740
over 16 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Пик грибного сезона в Подмосковье начнётся в конце августа и продлится до октября.
В лесах появятся белые, подосиновики, подберёзовики, лисички, рыжики и грузди.
Кошка открыла кран лапой и устроила потоп в московской квартире.
Вода затопила жильё соседей, а суд обязал хозяина питомца выплатить 654 тысячи рублей в качестве компенсации ущерба.
Москвичка спасла двоих детей и кота из горящей квартиры после включения чайника!
Пожар вспыхнул в квартире ЖК «Богородский» сразу после включения чайника. По словам хозяйки, причиной мог стать скачок напряжения, из-за которого загорелись электросчётчики.
Женщина успела вынести месячного малыша, семилетнего ребёнка и кота. Из дома также эвакуировали ещё 10 человек.
Огонь уничтожил кухню, коридор и жилые комнаты.
Одиноких россиянок старше 28 лет предложили освободить от работы по пятницам, чтобы у них было больше времени на личную жизнь!
Такая мера в перспективе поспособствует созданию большего количества семей и улучшит демографию в стране.
Управляющая компания вынесла велосипеды и санки из колясочной прямо во двор!
В ЖК «Баланс» управляющая компания освободила колясочную от велосипедов, санок и ватрушек, выставив вещи жильцов во двор. Часть жителей заявила, что их об этом не предупредили.
Другие поддержали решение, напомнив, что помещение предназначено только для хранения колясок.
Уже на следующий день часть вещей вернули обратно. По закону хранить …
В Подмосковье начинается вторая волна активности клещей!
Биологи предупредили, что в августе в Москве и Подмосковье начнётся второй пик активности клещей, который продлится до середины осени.
По словам специалистов, репелленты не гарантируют защиту, поскольку клещи способны найти даже небольшой открытый участок кожи.
Самой надёжной защитой остаётся закрытая одежда без открытых участков тела.
В Москве школьник погиб от удара током во время зарядки смартфона!
15-летний подросток заряжал телефон и смотрел видео, ожидая такси. В какой-то момент устройство перегрелось.
Мальчика ударило током. Его обнаружили без признаков жизни с ожогом в области груди.
Предварительно, причиной трагедии могла стать некачественная зарядка.
Рoссиян атакует мoль — oна жрёт деревья и мoжет вызвать аллергию.
В Мoскве, Пoдмoскoвье и других региoнах расплoдились сразу три вида вредителей: тoпoлевая, яблoнная и черёмухoвая.
Насекoмые уничтoжают черёмуху, яблoни, рябину и сирень. Специалисты гoвoрят, чтo бoльшие скoпления мoгут раздражать дыхательные пути.
ДРУГИЕ КАНАЛЫ И ГОРОДА
⬇️⬇️⬇️
Ставрополь Пятигорск Кисловодск
Телеблог Владивосток
Владивосток Уссурийск Арсеньев
Телеблог Алтай ( Live )
Алтай Барнаул Бийск
Саратов Энгельс Балаково
Донецк Луганск Мариуполь
Ульяновск - Ульяновская область
Ульяновск Димитровград Саранск
Телеблог Ижевск
Телеблог Удмуртия Live
Удмуртия Ижевск Воткинск
Хабаровск - Хабаровский край
Телеблог Башкортостан ( Live )
Телеблог Стерлитамак
Теле…
🗣👂Нужна надёжная реклама на проверенных ресурсах? Обращайтесь, поможем! Множество каналов с актуальными интересными новостями и обширной аудиторией 👍:📱
МОСКОВСКАЯ ОБЛАСТЬ
ТЕЛЕБЛОГ МОСКВА
МОСКВА БАЛАШИХА ПОДОЛЬСК - LIVE
Люберцы Королев Красногорск
Долгопрудный Реутов
Химки Сходня
Домодедово Видное
Ногинск Электросталь Павловский
Королев Мытищи Раменское
Подольск Домодедово Шереметьево
Мытищи
Районы Москвы ЦАО
Мещанс…
👏6🔥4👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @elektrostal_shchelkovo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 135,443 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 104 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Domains linked from posts
9 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Королев Мытищи Раменское Люберцы Телеблог реклама канал подслушано типичный девушки квартиры объявления продажа сниму общение” (@elektrostal_shchelkovo), 51,071 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/elektrostal_shchelkovo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
