Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Elbek Jumanazar

Channel

Elbek Jumanazar

@elbek_nazar

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

224subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 9 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002150780811
TypeChannel
Username@elbek_nazar
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 September 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/elbek_nazar

Growth

221224222.59 September 2026 — 221 subscribers9 September 2026 — 221 subscribers19 September 2026 — 224 subscribers9 September 202619 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 10 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 221–224 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 17:38224+3
9 Sept 2026, 16:22221no change
9 Sept 2026, 15:47221first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
77.7%
avg views ÷ 224 subscribers
Avg views / post
174
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
6
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 September 2026
Posts held17 (31 July 2026 – 8 September 2026)
Views total1,044
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Sept 2026, 16:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

8 Sept 2026, 03:30 UTC107 viewsread 9 September 2026

Qiziq… Turmush qurishdan keladigan foyda*ni qisman tasavvur qila olaman deb o’ylardimu, lekin bu kabi bo’shliqlarni ham to’ldira olishi haqida o’ylab ko’rmagan ekanman. U Oila deb atalmish dargohga yana nimalar yashirganini bilishga oshiqasan kishi.

5 Sept 2026, 05:41 UTC145 viewsread 9 September 2026
Photo

Qalb esa mehr-muhabbatga g’oyat tashnadir. “Menda hech bir shubha yo’qki, asosiy ehtiyojlarimizni qondirganimizdan keyin hayotimizni o’z yo’rig’iga soladigan ikkita tuyg’u bor: o’limdan qo’rqish va sevilishga rag’bat #eslatma Yusuf Karzoviy

4 Sept 2026, 14:33 UTC172 viewsread 9 September 2026

Biz o'zga sayyoraliklar deb ataydigan jonzodlarni — ilmiy tilda epistemik yolg'izlar ham deyishar ekan. Bugun bildim. Sodda qilib aytganda: Epistemik yolg'izlik — atrofingizda qanchalik do'stlar ko'p bo'lmasin, ko'p gaplashmang, o'zingizni tushunilmagandek his qilasiz. Siz uchun nihoyatda muhim narsalar bor-u, lekin ularni boshqaga tushuntirganingnizda ular siz nimani nazarda tutayotganingizni anglamayotgandek tuyul…

28 Aug 2026, 14:52 UTC269 viewsread 9 September 2026

Ergashtirish qiyin Shunday kun keladi, birlamchi va ikkilamchi ehtiyojlaringizni to'ldirasiz. Pul o'ylaganingizchalik ko'p ishlar qila olmasligini tushunasiz. Endi xaridlar va insonlarning hurmatidan huzurlanmay qo'yasiz. Shunday kunlarning birida balonli sumkasi bilan birinchi qavatdan uchincha qavatga zinalar orqali chiqishi kerak bo'lgan bir homilador ayolga yordam berasiz. Ichingizdan o'tgan huzurli his tamini t…

26 Aug 2026, 14:38 UTC275 viewsread 9 September 2026

Butun urmlik chelenj 50 yildan keyin bugungi kun haqida faxr bilan eslashimni tasavvur qilyapman… Inson qanday qilishni o’rganishdan oldin nega qilishi kerakligini tushunishi kerak, degan gapni biroz anglagandekman. Sababimni topdim, ya’ni. O’zi g’ayrat berdi, oxirimgacha qo’llashiga hech shubhasiz ishonaman. 26.08.2026

24 Aug 2026, 00:49 UTC315 viewsread 9 September 2026

Solishtirmang Hozir dunyoda 8,312,370,129 inson bor. Solishtirishda faqat — bir kishi yutadi. Qolgan 8,312,370,128 kishi yutqazadi. Tushunyapsizmi?… Bu o’yinda yutish ehtimolingiz 00.000000012% Yutqazish esa — 99.999999988% Umid qilamanki, yutolmasligingizni tushundingiz. Yagona to’g’ri yo’l — qatnashmaslik. Yaxshisi, o’tgan yil/oy/hafta, yoki kechagi siz bilan o’ynang. Shunda adolatdan bo’ladi. @elbek_nazar…

22 Aug 2026, 11:28 UTC309 viewsread 9 September 2026
Photo

Bugun qandaydir fayzli kun bo’ldi. (Yoki, koreyaning shiddatli hayotiga sho’ng’ib, aslida doim mavjud bo’lgan fayzni ko’rishga fursat.)

21 Aug 2026, 14:42 UTC383 viewsread 9 September 2026

Haddan tashqari ko'p ma'lumot olish bilimsizlikdan ko'ra xavfliroq Hayotga tatbiq etilmagan har bir bilim — miyada xuddi kompyuterimizda ochiq qolgan oynalar kabi fonda ishlab, energiyamizni so’rib turadi. Biz kitob o'qiganimizda yoki podkast eshitganimizda, miyamiz o'zini xuddi shu ishni bajarib bo'lgandek his qiladi, soxta qoniqish hosil qiladi. Lekin real hayotda hech narsa o'zgarmaydi. Birozdan so’ng, dofamin …

14 Aug 2026, 14:43 UTC421 viewsread 9 September 2026

Tasodiflar hayotni yanada energiyali qiladi. Bir yaqinim gap orasida: siz rostdan ham Hvasong (화성) da turasizmi? deb qolgandi. Va men bilmagan juda zo'r faktni aytdi. Koreys tilida Hvasong (화성) - Mars degani ham ekan. U mening ba'zi postlarimni o'qiganda xuddi Marsdan turib, ma'nosida yozilyapti, deb o'qigan. Bu men uchun ham ajoyib va esda qolarli bilish bo’ldi. O'zim uchun kerakli lekin bilmasdan ichida yurgan…

12 Aug 2026, 09:44 UTC364 viewsread 9 September 2026

50 yildan keyin, ko‘proq oyoqyalang yurmaganingiz uchun afsuslanasiz. O‘zbekistonda paytim bu ishni ikki marta qildim. Birinchisi. Bir yaqinim bilan bog‘da yurib gaplashish vaqti. Afsuski, u akamiz biroz tortinchoq* edi va: “Elbek, Koreyada bo‘lganimda sizga bajonidil sherik bo‘lardim, lekin bu yerda biroz noqulay”, degandi. Ikkinchisi. Ukam bilan mahalla oralab tungi sayr vaqti. Yaxshi, bu safar ukam ikkilanib bo…

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @elbek_nazar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Bek Olimjon
@DrBekOlimjon · 28,760
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 9 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Elbek Jumanazar” (@elbek_nazar), 224 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/elbek_nazar.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.