Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Егор Кириллович печатает

Channel

Егор Кириллович печатает

@ekitypes

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

150subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001995378491
TypeChannel
Username@ekitypes
CreatedBetween 1 October 2023 and 30 April 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ekitypes

Growth

150153151.511 August 2026 — 153 subscribers12 August 2026 — 153 subscribers3 September 2026 — 151 subscribers11 September 2026 — 150 subscribers11 August 202611 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 31 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 150–153 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 23:38150-1
3 Sept 2026, 17:35151-2
12 Aug 2026, 00:33153no change
11 Aug 2026, 22:31153first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 16 May 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
55s
Average length
55s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

449 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁16536.7%
13530.1%
🤔4510.0%
😱357.80%
296.46%
😢173.79%
🫡132.90%
😭51.11%
🤝51.11%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 449 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 16 May 2024 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Jul 2026, 18:29 UTC91 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026

... но не делай ей предложение в первую встречу

🤝5

27 Jan 2025, 09:41 UTC818 views23 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

С понедельничком. А как ваши дела?

😁12😢74

31 Dec 2024, 21:03 UTC702 views21 reactionsread 11 August 2026

С Новым годом, чуваки 🎄🎁 Пусть в 2025 всё будет лучше!

21

2 Dec 2024, 17:10 UTC800 views35 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Кстати, мы и на концерте в пятницу были вместе с вами, вы разве нас не видели?

😁197🤔5😱4

2 Dec 2024, 17:08 UTC659 views30 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

А это мы где-то в небе над Швейцарией отдыхаем

😁187😭5

2 Dec 2024, 17:05 UTC509 views33 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Но если честно, то мы и не только в Дубае были Вот мы в Париже, например

😁1577😱3🤔1

2 Dec 2024, 17:03 UTC450 views34 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Если кто не знал, куда на самом деле пропали Женя и Егор

😁18😱842🫡2

28 Nov 2024, 14:55 UTC576 views28 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Вперед, Эгоизм Конфликты Иллюзии Пренебрежение Амбиции Жадность

😁14🤔75😱2

5 Nov 2024, 13:40 UTC659 views31 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Ну шо вы? Трамп или Харрис? За кого топите? 😂

😁186🤔4🫡3

3 Nov 2024, 20:14 UTC605 views32 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Посмотрел сегодня первую серию нового «Преступления и наказания» с Янковским. Долго ждал этот сериал, как и многие. Оказалось по итогу не "оригинальное прочтение Достоевского", а какая-то кринжовая плохо поставленная второсортная дичь, в которой от Федора Михалыча только название. Очень расстроился. Решил, чтоб поднять настроение, в отместку глянуть тоже только что вышедший «Гудбай» с Дюжевым в роли Байдена. Еле дот

🤔12😢10😁72😱1

18 Oct 2024, 12:00 UTC522 views24 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Кстати, добавил на канал юзернейм @ekiko Теперь их два вместе с @ekitypes, в поиске находит по любому, какой нравится Пять тыщ за это отдал, между прочим - не хрен собачий!

😁13🫡65

18 Oct 2024, 09:48 UTC523 views20 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

О профессионализме рекрутеров В последнее время активно озадачился поиском новой работы. Варюсь в этом направлении уже несколько недель и до сих пор не могу перестать удивляться тому, насколько сильно упал средний уровень качества HR-специалистов за последние годы. Приведу несколько примеров. Некоторые из вас знают, что я достаточно узкопрофильный специалист с большим опытом работы в медиа. И вот, положим, встречаю

10🤔6😁4

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ekitypes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Егор Кириллович печатает” (@ekitypes), 150 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ekitypes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.