Channel
@ekaterinabergart
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
182subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002248418213 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ekaterinabergart |
| Created | Between 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ekaterinabergart |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:02 | 182 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:24 | 181 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:02 | 182 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:17 | 182 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (14 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 497 |
| Reactions total | 68 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
82 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 48 | 58.5% | |
| 🔥 | 24 | 29.3% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 6.10% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 3.66% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.22% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.22% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 82reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вообще Музей математики впечатлил нас своим интерактивным форматом. Здесь практически всё можно трогать, запускать, исследовать и испытывать на себе. Через игру становится понятно, насколько глубоко математика и технологии пронизывают нашу жизнь и сколько всего человечество смогло создать благодаря им. Честно говоря, даже меня это увлекло. Я не смогла пройти мимо огромного экрана, на котором движениями тела можно с…
🔥1
Мы с Сашей направлялись в район Челси — место, где сегодня сосредоточено множество коммерческих галерей Нью-Йорка. По дороге мы заглянули в Музей математики, и, к моему удивлению, там оказалась довольно большая экспозиция работ Майкла Шультайса (Michael Schultheis). Художник создает свои картины, используя математические модели, уравнения и формулы как язык для описания человеческих отношений, эмоций и процессов, п…
🔥1
Привет, мои дорогие! Сейчас я в Нью-Йорке. И главная цель этой поездки — современное искусство. В ближайшие дни я планирую исследовать музеи, галереи, архитектуру города и его особую атмосферу. Хочу увидеть, чем живёт одна из мировых столиц искусства, что сегодня показывают галереи и какие идеи рождаются в этом пространстве. Буду делиться с вами своими наблюдениями, открытиями и мыслями. Думаю, нас ждёт много инте…
❤20
На одном дыхании посмотрела сериал BBC «Гений. Пикассо» — все 10 серий за два дня. Вообще я почти не смотрю дома ни фильмы, ни сериалы, но этот стал исключением. Это захватывающая экранизация жизни Пабло Пикассо с великолепным Антонио Бандерасом в главной роли. Меня впечатлило всё: качество съёмки, актёрская игра, атмосфера и то, как авторы показали связь между жизнью художника, его отношениями и творчеством. Ист…
🔥8❤4
Тишина знает 70×70 см Холст, акрил Что хранит в себе память прожитой жизни? Историй? Слоя за слоем нанесённой краски? ✨ Мудрость, рождающуюся изнутри. ✨ Звенящую тишину. ✨ Искру жизни, готовую проявиться в любой момент. ✨ Непостижимую очевидность. ✨ Простые ответы, которые становятся слышны только тогда, когда внутри становится тихо. Наверное, это самая мистическая моя работа. Встречайте — «Тишина знает»…
🔥9❤2
Хочу продолжить тему состояния и показать вам одну из моих ранних работ, которую я ещё нигде не показывала. Она была написана на курсах энергетической живописи. В тот момент я совсем не думала о форме, композиции или о том, «красиво» ли получится. Моё внимание было полностью направлено на проживание заданной темы и сохранение определённого внутреннего состояния. А форма родилась как естественное следствие этого пр…
❤5🔥5🥰3😍3
Вы абсолютно правы. Состояние зрителя действительно может быть результатом воздействия формы и содержания произведения. Давайте поисследуем еще один уровень — откуда рождается сама форма? Для меня форма появляется не только как результат знания композиции или художественных приемов. Она рождается из неподдельного интереса к объекту исследования (фокуса, проживания…) и из внутреннего состояния самого исследователя (…
❤6💯1
Мои сегодняшние коллажи на тему ритма. По заданию это должна была быть статика. Но, кажется, не всё так однозначно. 🤭 На какой работе, ощущение статики сильнее? И кто угадает, из какого журнала эти вырезки? 😂😂
❤4😁1
Как я стала размером с горы (и перестала делить людей) #Атланты_как_это_было финал (вся история по хештегу 👆👆👆) День четвёртый на Поляне выдался самым неожиданным. Накануне вечном на массаже я вдруг увидела картину, как рентген.. чёткая, Во мне сидит программа, которая делит людей по статусу, по крутости, по «достойности». И те, кто на вершине, конечно, в отдельной касте, а все остальные - маленькие «простые смерт…
❤7🥰2
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @ekaterinabergart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 357,782 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Kate Berg | Art of my heart ❤️” (@ekaterinabergart), 182 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ekaterinabergart.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.