Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Чувства, толк и расстановки

Channel

Чувства, толк и расстановки

@ekaterina_rasstanovka

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

203subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001839028531
TypeChannel
Username@ekaterina_rasstanovka
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ekaterina_rasstanovka

Growth

203208205.59 August 2026 — 208 subscribers9 August 2026 — 208 subscribers24 August 2026 — 207 subscribers31 August 2026 — 206 subscribers9 September 2026 — 204 subscribers17 September 2026 — 203 subscribers9 August 202617 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 39 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 202–209 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 15:37203-1
9 Sept 2026, 04:59204-2
31 Aug 2026, 08:37206-1
24 Aug 2026, 01:34207-1
9 Aug 2026, 15:14208no change
9 Aug 2026, 05:16208first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

105 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5552.4%
🔥2523.8%
👍98.57%
😁98.57%
💯32.86%
👏21.90%
🕊10.952%
🤔10.952%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 105 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 19:21 UTC35 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁2🔥1🤔1

1 Aug 2026, 18:16 UTC32 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Мне ещё нравится карта из экзистенциального анализа Альфрида Лэнгле, про 4 фундаментальных мотивации. Очень похоже на первые 4 чакры, кстати😁 так проще запомнить. 1 мотивация: безопасность, могу ли я вообще жить 2-я: наслаждение, нравится ли мне жить 3-я: идентичность, могу ли я быть собой 4-я: смыслы, включённость в более широкий контекст Вот это тоже момент, как может распасться "идеальный брак". Люди научились к

3

1 Aug 2026, 18:06 UTC27 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Одиночество в паре Ещё интересный момент из Гарвардского исследования — отношения важны, и именно близкие. Если человек чувствует себя одиноким в паре, это даже хуже, чем жить одному. Так вот, раньше казалось, что человек в принципе одинок, что-то нарушено с привязанностью, и поэтому он одинок в браке. Но вот говорят, что нет, часто люди одиноки именно в браке, с конкретным партнёром. Причём внешне это может быть

4

31 Jul 2026, 14:50 UTC53 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Самое важное для долголетия Наверняка вы слышали про Гарвардское исследование. С 1938 года изучали жизнь людей, чтобы понять, какие физические и психические факторы влияют на долголетие и счастье в жизни, с юности до глубокой старости. Конечно же, тогда ещё начали со студентов — белых американцев, среди них был даже Роберт Кеннеди. Потом справедливости ради попробовали подключить и людей из более бедных слоёв, и жен

🔥32🕊1

23 Jul 2026, 15:40 UTC58 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

На фото: на великах через пол Москвы

8👍1

23 Jul 2026, 12:48 UTC49 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Про лишний вес Кто помнит, мы года три назад роскошные расстановочные группы делали про лишний вес, потому что там миллион психологических динамик. И конечно, это всё биопсихосоциальная история. Не то, чтобы худеешь от расстановки. Скорее, проще настроить питание и тренировки. У меня в 40+ были разные качели с весом, когда я то поправлялась, то худела. В итоге сейчас стабильно: - это +10 от того, что мне хочется -

👍7

23 Jul 2026, 11:53 UTC43 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

На даче красота: солнышко, не жарко, малина с куста. Особенно если получилось решить вопрос с интернетом и немножко работать прямо отсюда. Пособираю ответы на вопросы, ну и заметки про возраст и вот это всё.

👏2

14 Jul 2026, 14:18 UTC61 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Как использовать ИИ для здоровья Может вы и сами уже научились, но вдруг пригодится. Мне очень понравилось использовать ИИ по теме здоровья. Это не замена врачам. Наоборот, это скорее дневник наблюдений, и с помощью ИИ можно разобраться, к какому врачу идти. Я просто текстом общаюсь с Deep Seek, и по моим наблюдениям, за год он сильно поумнел (или я?) Главное, он раньше сам много придумывал, а сейчас даёт ссылки,

🔥6👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ekaterina_rasstanovka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Чувства, толк и расстановки” (@ekaterina_rasstanovka), 203 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ekaterina_rasstanovka.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.