Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 43 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 681–692 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 00:42
682
-2
10 Sept 2026, 00:40
684
-1
1 Sept 2026, 08:27
685
-2
24 Aug 2026, 21:27
687
-4
16 Aug 2026, 19:46
691
+2
8 Aug 2026, 07:27
689
+1
8 Aug 2026, 02:20
688
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:27
688
first reading
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
13s
Average length
13s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
62 reactions across 6 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
24
38.7%
🔥
17
27.4%
⚡
14
22.6%
❤🔥
3
4.84%
🤝
2
3.23%
🥰
2
3.23%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 62 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Открываю запись на бесплатную консультацию в августе
Всего 5 мест
У многих экспертов огромный опыт и знания, но из-за хаотичных действий и отсутствия системы в блоге нет продаж или их мало. Из-за этого происходит просадка по состоянию и пропадает вера в свой результат.
Я решила взять 5 экспертов на бесплатную качественную консультацию в августе, где помогу распаковать почему у вас нет системных продаж и персональн…
Рабочий вайб🥰
За день собрали с моим экспертом группу на тренинг «Перезагрузка» пикник + яхта, осталось 3 места, больше на яхте не умещается).
Еще один классный эксперт заходит в работу. Назвала меня красивым наставником, обожаю🫂😅.
Большинство экспертов хотят сделать в онлайне доход таким, какой он был в найме. Это не сложно. Даже скучно).
Но если раньше я была про квантовый рост, то сейчас внутренний запрос на п…
В первые 2 недели работы с экспертом собрали заявок на 130 тысяч, сделали продажи на 100 тысяч. Окупили мою работу и вышли в плюс. Это первый совместный опыт. Параллельно появился партнер и уже самостоятельно вкладывается в развитие проекта.
Выстраивали стабильную систему продаж плавно, чтобы у эксперта не было усталости и откатов.
Талант эксперта - навык коммуникации с людьми, умение выстраивать отношения с аудито…
Когда я поняла, что начинается новый этап роста, передо мной стоял выбор. Я могла пойти «делать сама» и идти в этот переход годами. Но я выбрала зайти в личную работу к наставнику - миллионеру, с которой уже делала результаты. Это VIP формат, где мы решаем мои конкретные задачи и поэтому я расту быстрее.
Я купила рабочую методологию, которая усилит мой продукт и поможет моим экспертам и ученикам научиться легче дела…
Вчера была на бизнес ужине с предпринимателями Москвы.
Многим экспертам не хватает предпринимательской энергии и навыков. Когда есть четкая стратегия и двигаешься по ней понятно и логично. При этом не теряя себя, а наоборот собираясь в единое целое.
Каждое действие выверено и ведет к результату.
Без лишних действий и многозадачности.
Без хаоса и суеты.
Без стресса и гонки.
С фокусом на эффективные действия.
Я помо…
❤7⚡5🔥4
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @ekasi_produce. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Евгения и Денис: Жизнь и путешествия. @evgeniia_seredova · 22,158 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 21 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Продюсер экспертов | Создатель” (@ekasi_produce), 682 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ekasi_produce.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.