11 measurements spanning 9 days, net -23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,743–12,772 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 00:03
12,746
-5
13 Aug 2026, 17:45
12,751
-5
12 Aug 2026, 16:14
12,756
-5
11 Aug 2026, 13:02
12,761
-2
10 Aug 2026, 09:28
12,763
-3
9 Aug 2026, 12:37
12,766
+2
8 Aug 2026, 09:41
12,764
-3
7 Aug 2026, 11:34
12,767
-1
6 Aug 2026, 13:51
12,768
-1
6 Aug 2026, 05:15
12,769
no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:08
12,769
first reading
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 19 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
48.6%
avg views ÷ 12,746 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,200
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.99%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 25 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held
25 (19 June 2026 – 13 August 2026)
Views total
74,340
Reactions total
1,479
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 00:18 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,940
Videos
≈341
Links
≈2,680
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
16m 20s
Average length
4m 05s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,100 reactions across 24 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,548
49.9%
🔥
451
14.5%
👏
191
6.16%
❤
184
5.94%
🤬
169
5.45%
🙏
120
3.87%
👌
84
2.71%
🤮
78
2.52%
🤔
66
2.13%
🤯
37
1.19%
🤣
29
0.935%
🏆
21
0.677%
💩
19
0.613%
💯
19
0.613%
⚡
16
0.516%
😁
12
0.387%
😡
11
0.355%
👀
7
0.226%
🎉
6
0.194%
👎
6
0.194%
10 further kinds
26
0.839%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,186reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Auch wenn es selten vorkommt: Wir teilen eine Grafik der Anti-AfD-NGO Campact.
Regelmäßig nehmen wir die Machenschaften der extrem linken NGO auseinander – doch in diesem Punkt hat sie leider recht. Warum, erklären wir in diesem Artikel.
⚠️ Wir müssen die Briefwahl flächendeckend beobachten und bereits vor dem Wahltag überprüfen, ob in den Rathäusern alle Regeln eingehalten werden. ⚠️
Gleichzeitig dürfen wir unser…
Campacts AfD-Umfrage wird zum Eigentor
Ausgerechnet die extrem linke NGO, die mit über drei Millionen Euro und dubiosen, teils linksextremen Partnern AfD-Erfolge verhindern will, liefert in ihrer ersten Umfrage den bislang besten Wert für die AfD.
Das dürfte noch mehr rechte Wähler mobilisieren. Ob die Umfrage auch die eigene Klientel zu Wechselwählern macht, ist hingegen fraglich.
Zuletzt griff der NGO-Komplex sog…
Es könnte verdammt knapp werden – jeder kann helfen!
Wahlbeobachtung wird so wichtig wie nie zuvor. Rund 2.600 Wahllokale müssen im Blick behalten werden – die genaue Zahl hängt auch von den Briefwahlbezirken ab.
Wartet nicht bis zum Wahltag. Bereitet euch jetzt vor. Beschäftigt euch mit den Abläufen, kennt eure Rechte und wisst, worauf ihr achten müsst. Noch besser: Werdet Wahlhelfer!
Unten findet ihr unseren Lei…
Politische Gesinnungsprüfung für Wahlhelfer in Sachsen-Anhalt?
Ein brisanter Vorgang wird vor der Landtagswahl zum Thema im Landtag. Eine aktuelle Anfrage des Abgeordneten Gordon Köhler greift einen Wahleinspruch aus unserer Wahlbeobachter-Kampagne auf.
Ein rechter Wahlhelfer im Harz wurde auf Anordnung der Landeswahlleiterin abberufen – möglicherweise aus politischen Gründen.
Sollte sich dieser Verdacht bestätigen…
Sie werden es versuchen – wir halten dagegen! 🗳
Schon jetzt ist absehbar, dass wieder einige versuchen werden, das Wahlergebnis in die eigene Hand zu nehmen, wenn in Sachsen-Anhalt, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern und Berlin gewählt wird. Manche können einen demokratischen Wandel offenbar nicht akzeptieren.
Ein wirksames Mittel dagegen: Werdet selbst Wahlhelfer!
Fragt NOCH HEUTE bei eurer Kommune nach, wo Wahlhelfer gebra…
Die Fakten zum Repressionsbuch
Seit einiger Zeit ist das Haftbuch von Kurt Hättasch auch hier im EinProzent-Versand erhältlich.
Die wichtigsten Fakten zum Fall sowie Einschätzungen von Juristen und politischen Beobachtern findet ihr in unseren ausführlichen Recherchen.
➡️ FAQ Sächsische Separatisten
➡️ „Sächsische Separatisten“: Widerspruch verboten
➡️ Separatistenprozess wird zum Justizskandal
🔶 Folgt »Ein Pro…
Es ist ein brisanter Verdacht: Wird die Gemeinnützigkeit eines Vereins in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern genutzt, um steuerlich begünstigte Spenden für eine politische Kampagne gegen die AfD einzuwerben? Zumal so kurz vor den Landtagswahlen?
Wie immer mittendrin: das Kampagnennetzwerk „Campact“. Im ausführlichen Interview mit dem Sender „Auf1“ erklärt der Politikwissenschaftler Michael Schäfer, worum es geht.
Zu den Fakten…
AUF1-Interview: Widerstand gegen den NGO-Komplex
Wir sind der Spur des Geldes gefolgt: Aktuell schließen sich verschiedene NGO-Bündnisse zusammen, um gegen die AfD vorzugehen. Dabei scheint nicht immer alles rechtlich korrekt abzulaufen. Deshalb haben wir Staatsanwaltschaften und Finanzämter über mehrere Vorgänge informiert.
Mehr dazu im Interview mit dem Politikwissenschaftler Michael Schäfer.
Zu den Fakten:
🧑🏼…
Ansatzpunkt Gemeinnützigkeit: So geht’s!
Linke Vereine und Fördermittelempfänger fürchten kaum etwas mehr als echte Transparenz.
Hier findet ihr eine Anleitung zum Widerstand gegen den NGO-Filz:
https://www.einprozent.de/blog/meinungsfreiheit/ansatzpunkt-gemeinnuetzigkeit-so-geht-es/3203
🔶 Folgt »Ein Prozent«!
➡️ Unterstützt uns!
✉️ Mehr Infos im Rundbrief.
🎙 Unsere Podcasts.
📚 Versand für den Widerstand.
Anzeige gegen die linke Spendenplattform Betterplace und einen Rostocker Verein
Wir haben bereits ausführlich über die Aktivitäten des NGO-Komplexes im Kampf gegen die AfD bei den aktuellen Landtagswahlen im Osten berichtet.
Nun wird es konkret: Zur Finanzierung einer politischen Kampagne im Vorfeld der Landtagswahl wurde ein gemeinnütziger Rostocker Verein zwischengeschaltet. Auf diese Weise können für Spenden ste…
KENNE DEINE GEGNER: Eine gescheiterte Grüne zieht gegen die AfD in den Kampf
Zehn Jahre saß Madeleine Henfling für die Grünen im Thüringer Landtag, zuletzt war sie sogar Spitzenkandidatin. Das Ergebnis: magere 3,2 Prozent, der Rauswurf aus dem Parlament – und das Ende ihrer politischen Karriere.
Das eigene Scheitern scheint sie schlecht verkraftet zu haben. Henfling hat nun ein neues Betätigungsfeld: den Kampf gege…
Sehenswert:
Beim Sommerfest des Antaios-Verlags wurde über den Fall Kurt Hättasch und die staatliche Konstruktion der angeblichen Terrorgruppe „Sächsische Separatisten“ gesprochen.
Zu Gast waren die Ehefrau des Inhaftierten sowie sein Rechtsanwalt.
Zum Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXaVw-2JDps
Wir berichten bereits seit längerer Zeit über diesen Justizskandal, der für Politik und Medien zunehmend zum Prob…
👍86🙏23❤10🔥3🍓1
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @ein_prozent. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 19,674 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 29 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Freie Sachsen @freiesachsen · 110,790 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ein Prozent” (@ein_prozent), 12,746 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ein_prozent.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.