3 measurements spanning 16 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 102–103 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Aug 2026, 03:05
103
+1
9 Aug 2026, 10:02
102
no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:00
102
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 19 March 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
12m 02s
Average length
1m 12s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
17 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
5
29.4%
👍
3
17.6%
😱
3
17.6%
👾
2
11.8%
🔥
2
11.8%
🤯
2
11.8%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 19 March 2024 to 31 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Elon Musk paga USD$300 millones a Telegram para que integre su plataforma de generación de texto. Y le ofrece el 50% de las suscripciones que surjan de esta app de mensajería.
Esto nos obliga a preguntarnos ¿Qué gana Musk? La respuesta rápida e inmediata es: acceso a datos, en principio a las conversaciones que los usuarios tengan con el modelo de generación de texto.
Pero la verdad es que nada limita a Telegram a …
¡Impresionante demostración de las habilidades de Atlas! 😱
Boston Dynamics en colaboración con el Instituto RAI entrenaron un modelo de Reinforcement Learning utilizando captura de movimiento como referencia.
El resultado: movimientos fluidos e increíblemente humanos! 🤸
La empresa 1X no quiere quedarse atrás, y presenta NEO Gamma. La nueva versión de su robot hogareño, la evolución después de NEO Beta.
A diferencia de Figure es muy probable que el video sea solo una demostración y el robot esté siendo teleoperado por una persona.
🤯 Increíble 🤯
¿Tendrías uno en tu casa?
Figure nos muestra una increíble demo!
Según dicen crearon un nuevo modelo de deep learning que unifica Visión, Lenguaje y Acción. Permitiendo recibir órdenes, y ejecutarlas.
El video da a entender que un único modelo puede controlar múltiples robots de manera coordinada. 🤖🤖
😱 - Los robots comienzan a moverse al momento 00:35
El robot Unitree H1 formó parte de la gala del Festival de Primavera 🇨🇳 🧧 新春快乐!
Le programaron diferentes movimientos de baile, que fueron reproducidos de manera sincronizada, y acompañados por las bailarinas.
Boston Dynamics, como siempre, mostrando su superioridad técnica.
El video no está acelerado, no tiene cortes, está grabado a 60 cuadros por segundo y el comportamiento es 100% autónomo.
Ninguna otra empresa de robótica se anima a tanto.
Ya me venían aburriendo los avances en Inteligencia Artificial Generativa, pero la verdad que los resultados de este paper me sorprendieron mucho.
Éste modelo es capaz de sintetizar video de una persona hablando o cantando usando solo una imagen y un archivo de audio. ¡Impresionante! 🤯
¿Quién quiere un abrazo robótico? 🤗
¡X1 presenta el primer video de NEO Beta en funcionamiento! Sus principales características son ser liviano y blando .
Esto lo vuelve seguro para funcionar en un entorno hogareño, sin miedo de que nos lastime.
Pesa apenas 30 kilos, mide 1.65 metros y es muy silencioso (el sonido que se escucha en el video está amplificado). En el video el robot está siendo teleoperado por un ser…
Nuevo video de Atlas haciendo "ejercicio" 🦾 (Boston Dynamics)
❤1👍1👾1
Signed Eibriel
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @eibriels. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 19 March 2024 to 31 May 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Eibriel - Inteligencia Artificial y Robótica” (@eibriels), 103 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eibriels.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.