Channel
@ehsanmnotes
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
190subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001304938478 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ehsanmnotes |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ehsanmnotes |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:18 | 190 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:48 | 191 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:41 | 191 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (14 May 2025 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,160 |
| Reactions total | 19 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 06:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
23 reactions across 11 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 12 | 52.2% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 47.8% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2025 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📝 دموکراسی واقعاً چیست؟ تعریفی با چاشنی تئوریک-اقتصادی (4/4) ✍ احسان موسوی روشن است که در این میان، ما با پدیده «جهل عقلایی» (Rational Ignorance) نیز مواجه هستیم؛ جایی که افراد تلاش زیادی برای کسب اطلاعات کافی درباره مسائل نمیکنند تا انتخابی دقیق داشته باشند، مثلاً هنگام رای دادن. زیرا یک رای به تنهایی تقریباً هیچ تاثیری ندارد، اما داشتن یک انتخاب کاملاً آگاهانه هزینهای سنگین برای فرد به همراه دارد. اینها نشان م…
👍2
📝 دموکراسی واقعاً چیست؟ تعریفی با چاشنی تئوریک-اقتصادی (3/4) ✍ احسان موسوی علاوه بر این، وجود ریسکها و نااطمینانیها، افراد را به سمتی سوق میدهد که نهادها و سازوکارهایی را برای مدیریت آنها و کاهش هزینههایشان طراحی کنند (یا دستکم تلاش نمایند که چنین کنند). پیچیدگی روزافزون اقتصاد، همراه با عدم تقارن اطلاعاتی در آن که به پدیدههایی چون «کژمنشی» (Moral Hazard) و «کژگزینی» (Adverse Selection) میانجامد، از دیگر مسا…
👍2
📝 دموکراسی واقعاً چیست؟ تعریفی با چاشنی تئوریک-اقتصادی (2/4) ✍ احسان موسوی در این روایت تاریخی، دو موضوع حائز اهمیت است: نخست اینکه هدف، تثبیت سهمی از قدرت و به رسمیت شناختن منافع ذینفعان متعدد در تعیین یک مسئله حیاتی به نام «مالیات» بود. دوم اینکه دستیابی به این هدف، از طریق اعمال فشار بر پادشاه و مجبور کردن او به پذیرش ترتیبات جدید و نهادی تازه در عرصه سیاسی رخ داد. این بدان معناست که آنچه به دست آمد، یک راهکار …
👍2
📝 دموکراسی واقعاً چیست؟ تعریفی با چاشنی تئوریک-اقتصادی (1/4) ✍ احسان موسوی دموکراسی صرفاً به معنای حکومت اکثریت نیست، بلکه درباره «مصالحه» و «توافق» است. در یک دموکراسی، تمرکز بر این است که ما بهعنوان ذینفعان چطور میتوانیم با هم گفتگو، همکاری و چانهزنی کنیم و در نهایت تصمیم بگیریم. اگرچه رای اکثریت در آن نقش مهمی ایفا میکند، اما قاعده اکثریت ساده (Simple Majority) همیشه پاسخ نبوده و حتی برای اخذ یک تصمیم کافی …
👍2
📌 رویکرد رئیس جدید فدرال رزرو: کوین وارش علاقهای به Forward Guidance ندارد. 💡 اما Forward Guidance چیست؟ این یک ابزار سیاست پولی است؛ وقتی که سیاستگذار پولی درباره اهداف سیاست پولی آینده خود، اطلاعاتی ارائه میدهد. در واقع، او بیان میکند که انتظار دارد سیاست پولی در آینده چه مسیری را طی کند. با بیان این اطلاعات، بازیگران بازارها میتوانند رفتار خود را مطابق با آن تطبیق دهند و اینگونه، سیاستگذار بر رفتار آنها نیز …
📝 یکی از مشکلاتی که در چنین بحث هایی وجود دارد، معنای «لیبرالیسم» است. باید دید منظور شخص از این عبارت چیست. آیا آن را راولزی تعریف کرده و بسوی social liberalism متمایل هستید یا بر لیبرالیسم کلاسیک تاکید دارید؟ ایرادی که باید این روزها گرفت، بر دموکراسی است که کارکرد اصلی آن فراموش شده و گاردریلهای لیبرالی آن که ضروری هستند برای عملکرد بهترش، نادیده گرفته شدهاند. من احتمال میدهم عاصم اوغلو دچار این خطا شده که بج…
❤2
کتاب جدید عاصم اوغلو به نام: What Happened to Liberal Democracy? ویدیوی معرفی کتاب در سایت ناشر: https://shapingwork.mit.edu/what-happened-to-liberal-democracy/ ویدیوی معرفی کتاب در توییتر نویسنده: https://x.com/DAcemogluMIT/status/2081790602308440362 ☑ @ehsanmnotes
❤1
یادداشت اخیر من در وبسایت بنیاد آموزش اقتصاد (FEE) ✍ Why People Hoard: The economics of scarcity 👤 Ehsan Mousavi (احسان موسوی) 👈 چرا احتکار رخ میدهد، چه چیزی درباره اقتصاد به ما میگوید و آیا باید آن را رفتاری مخل اقتصاد دانست؟ 🌐 https://fee.org/articles/why-people-hoard/ ☑ @ehsanmnotes
❤4👍1
💡 درک اقتصاد، درک انگیزهها و محدودیتها و ناشناختههاست: وقتی درباره سیاست صحبت میکنیم، باید این را در نظر گرفت که درحال صحبت از یک پدیده انسانی هستیم. هر پدیدهای که بازیگران اصلی آن، انسانها باشند، مساله انگیزه و منافع، لاجرم در آن نقش ایفا میکند؛ این بدین معناست که تفاوتی ندارد درباره کنش بازیگران اقتصادی صحبت میکنیم، تعامل بین انسانها برای یک موضوع اجتماعی و یا یک پدیده سیاسی و تعامل سیاستمداران. در هر صور…
👍2❤1
✍ What indeed is democracy? An economic-theoretic definition 📝 Democracy is not just about majority rule; it is about compromise. In a democracy, the focus is on how we, as stakeholders, can collectively discuss, collaborate, negotiate, and then make a decision. While majority rule plays an important role, a simple majority is not always the answer, nor is it sufficient for making a decision. 💡 Read More: 🌐 https:/…
✍ The Architecture of Compromise: Power Structure and the Creation of the U.S. Constitution 📝 The 81-year-old Benjamin Franklin expressed his support for the Constitution as follows: I consent, Sir, to this Constitution because I expect no better, and because I am not sure, that it is not the best. But this is not the only time that advocates of the Constitution, before its ratification, acknowledged its imperfecti…
❤1
✍ A Century of Postponement: The Legal and Political Handling of Slavery from 1776 to 1861 📝 The history of the United States has always witnessed great consensus, including the Constitution itself, which was the result of an important compromise. However, the resolution of the slavery issue ultimately came about through a civil war; before that, not even the slightest consensus could ever form around it among the …
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ehsanmnotes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,034,935 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ehsan's Notes” (@ehsanmnotes), 190 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ehsanmnotes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.