Channel
@ehlibejt_org_ch
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
161subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001244620468 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ehlibejt_org_ch |
| Description | ehlibejt.org je prostor za predstavljanje izvornog Muhammed ovog islama, očitovanog u časnom Ehli bejta, a.s. |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ehlibejt_org_ch |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 161 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 161 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (30 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,320 |
| Reactions total | 261 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
261 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 239 | 91.6% | |
| 😢 | 14 | 5.36% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 1.92% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 1.15% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 261reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
┅─🍃🌸🍃─┅ Pješačenje na Erbeinu je promovisanje šerijata i vilajeta ma'suma, a.s. Neprijatelji, tlačitelji i ove tekfirske skupine ostaju zaprepašteni naspram ove snage. Ovo pješačenje je pokazatelj veličine šiizma i ja bih volio da imam fizičku snagu da mogu učestvovati. Sejjid Musa Šubejri Zendžani https://t.me/ehlibejt_org_ch ┅─🍃🌸🍃─┅
❤3
🌺 Put licemjera 🍀 Imam Ali, a.s.: Ne teži da postigneš ovaj svijet ahiretskim djelovanjem, to je put licemjera i priroda pokvarenjaka. https://t.me/ehlibejt_org_ch
❤9👍3
┅─🍃🌸🍃─┅ Fragment iz zijareta Imama Husejna, a.s.: Svjedočim da si ubijen i da nisi umro, šaviše nadajići se tvom (čistom) životu žive srca tvojih sljedbenika. https://t.me/ehlibejt_org_ch ┅─🍃🌸🍃─┅
❤8
🍀 Prijatelji i neprijatelji 🌺 Zapovjednik vernika, Imam Ali a.s., kaže: Tri su ti prijatelja i tri su ti neprijatelja. Prijatelji su ti prijatelj tvoj, prijatelj prijatelja tvoga i neprijatelj neprijatelja tvog. A neprijatelji su ti neprijatelj tvoj, neprijatelj prijatelja tvog i prijatelj neprijatelja tvoga. 📚 Staza rječitosti, mudrost 305. https://t.me/ehlibejt_org_ch
❤16
┅─🍃🌸🍃─┅ Džabir ibn Abdullah Ansari, čuveni ashab, je bio slijep kada je došao da zijareti Imama Husejna, a.s., ali je po mirisu prepoznao njegov mezar. To je bilo četrdeset dana nakon kerbelske tragedije. Pratio ga je Atije. Džabir mu se obratio riječima: “O Atije, mi dijelimo sevape šehida Kerbele.” Atije je bio zatečen tom rečenicom pa je rekao: “Šta to pričaš? Njihova djeca su jetimi, žene udovic…
❤8
🌺 Salavat na tešehudu 🍀 Većina muslimanksih pravnika vjeruju da je stroga obaveza donijeti salavat na Poslanikov Ehli bejt na tešehudu. Prenosi Džabir Dža'fi od Imama Bakira, a.s.: “Rekao je Allahov poslanik, s.a.v.a.: “Ko obavi namaz a u njemu ne donese salavat na mene i na moj Ehli bejt, taj namaz mu se ne prima.” 📚 El-Hilaf, sv. 1, str. 131. ✍🏻 Kojeg Poslanika slijede i koji Kur'an uče ljudi koji mrze i ubijaj…
❤14
┅─🍃🌸🍃─┅ Ajetollah Behdžet koji je preselio 2009 godine o pješačenju na dan Erbeina Mi imamo predaju da kada se pojavi Imam Mehdi, a.s., uzviknuti će nekoliko (pet) rečenica: "O stanovnici svijeta, znajte da su moga djeda Husejna ubili žednog. O stanovnici svijeta, znajte da su mog djeda Husejna zgnječili iz mržnje prema njemu..." Imam Zeman će sebe predstaviti cijelom svijetu putem Imama Husejna, a.s. Prema tome, u t…
❤11
🌺 Razum i strasti 🍀 Imam Ali, a.s.: Svevišnji je melekima dao razum bez strasti, životinjama strasti bez razuma ljudima i razum i strasti, kome god razum pobjedi strasti pa on je bolji od meleka kome strasti pobjede razum on je gori od životinja. 📚 Ileluš-šeraje', str. 4, hadis 1. https://t.me/ehlibejt_org_ch
❤15💯3
┅─🍃🌸🍃─┅ Narav koju vidite na Erbeinu je manifestacija naravi Imama Husejna, a.s., zapravo mali prikaz gostoprimstva Prvaka šehida u ljudima koji imaju goste. Vi na Erbeinu vidite prikaz Imamovog gostoprimstva u Džennetu i gostoprimstva koje će se desiti u vrijeme pojave Imama Medija, a.s., i to je ono što privlači zaljubljenike. Sejjid Mir Bakeri https://t.me/ehlibejt_org_ch ┅─🍃🌸🍃─┅
❤12
⚜️ Erbein ⚜️ Četrdeset bolnih dana od šehadeta Imama O Husejne rano moja sve nas boli žrtva tvoja Džabir ibni Abdullah je stari ashab dobri slijepi pješice je do Kerbele četres dana iš'o vele Eufratom gusulio obuk'o se namiris'o kad je stigao do humke svete žrtve tu je pao dozivo je: O Imame! zašto, zašto šutiš na me? ali kako da prozboriš kad ti glavu o'sjekli su... https://t.me/ehlibejt_org_ch
😢14❤3
┅─🍃🌸🍃─┅ Prisustvo miliona bosonogih hodočasnika sa istoka i zapada zemlje, sa dalekih i bliskih područja koji idu ka svetoj Kerbeli zapravo je jedan veliki kongres koji obznanjuje svijetu da su Husejnov put i njegovi ciljevi vječni i nezaboravni. Šehidi na ovom putu su šehidi na putu istine i neustrašivost i oni su istinski junaci. Da ih Allah proživi sa ashabima Imama Husejna jer su svoj život žrtvovali za Husejna. …
❤10
🌺 Srce je čisto dok ga djela prate 🌺 Mudri Lukman ustaje na noćni namaz, budi gazdu, on veli: Ma neka, Bog je milostiv. Ustaje na sabah, zove gazdu ovaj: Ma neka, Bog je milostiv. Ustaje kad je svanulo i budi gazdu: Hajde ovo je najbolje vrijeme za zikr! On veli: ma Bog je milostiv a moje srce je čisto, ne beri brige sve je OK. Sutra mu vlasnik daje vreću pšenice da posije, ali on ode na pijacu i kupi za to vreću s…
❤15
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ehlibejt_org_ch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 720,982 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ehlibejt.org” (@ehlibejt_org_ch), 161 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ehlibejt_org_ch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.