Channel
@egswex
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
83subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001937669503 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @egswex |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/egswex |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 10:45 | 83 | no change |
| 15 Aug 2026, 10:35 | 83 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 5 January 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 February 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
563 reactions across 10 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5460909178648278534 | 125 | 22.2% | |
| 💔 | 104 | 18.5% | |
| custom 5262511625495129403 | 70 | 12.4% | |
| custom 5400004961843033542 | 51 | 9.06% | |
| custom 5438168250233928501 | 41 | 7.28% | |
| custom 5465637963410976701 | 40 | 7.10% | |
| 💋 | 35 | 6.22% | |
| custom 5458460321440084522 | 29 | 5.15% | |
| ❤ | 25 | 4.44% | |
| custom 5416132233327030696 | 24 | 4.26% | |
| 🍓 | 8 | 1.42% | |
| 💯 | 7 | 1.24% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 0.533% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 0.178% |
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 563 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 5 January 2024 to 27 February 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вы презираете тех, кто принадлежит к высшим кругам, за их снобизм, за высокомерный тон, за напыщенные манеры верно ведь? А что вы им противопоставляете? Мелкое тщеславие, любование собой, тем, что не позволяете себе неприличных мыслей, неприличных поступков, неприличного поведения. А вы знаете, что всё великое в истории искусства, всё прекрасное в жизни фактически либо оказывается тем, что вы считаете неприличным, ли…
Signed судья
Едва родившись, еще не получив никакого опыта, мы тем не менее уже с момента появления на свет знаем чувство страха, страх живет в наших воспоминаниях, – а воспоминания возникают из опыта.🪙
Signed ceoltóir
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed coireolaí
Странная вещь - повешение. Я никогда не видел, как вешают, но наблюдавшие эту казнь описывали мне ее во всех подробностях десятки раз, так что я очень хорошо знаю, что произойдет со мной. Я буду стоять на крышке люка, - руки и ноги в кандалах, черный капюшон надвинут на глаза, узел петли за правым ухом, под моими ногами разверзнется дыра, и я буду падать до тех пор, пока веревка, натянувшаяся до отказа под тяжестью м…
Signed القاضي
Let me tell the truth📼
custom 540000496184303354219💋12💔11🍓3❤2💯2
Signed ceoltóir
Смерть — это пространство🌟 Смерть — это длина и ширина, 🌟А жизнь — отрезки времени внутри У вечности нет времени, у времени — любви И это тянется за мной с начала века🌟 Плевать, что нет у времени любви 🐉Важней, что есть у человека.
custom 546563796341097670140💋10💔8💯3❤2🍓2
Signed المحامي
Я был этим человеком во всех его рождения, во всех его устремлениях. Я остаюсь им сегодня, когда жду смерти, на которую обречён законом, созданным мною же много тысяч лет тому назад и уже сотни раз обрекавшем меня на ту же самую смерть. И, созерцая это моё бесконечное прошлое, я вижу в нём следы многих благотворных влияний и главное из них - любовь к женщине.
💔28custom 541613223332703069624❤1
Signed réalteolaí
Это и есть любовь? Получать от одних объятий море спокойствия? Услышав заветное признание в любви, понять, что этот момент важнее всего, что когда-то было между ними двумя? Чувствовать, как в сердце наполняется бесконечное тепло, нежность и любовь, когда они двое смотрят друг друга в глаза и видят там то, что никогда не исчезнет — их собственное отражение?
custom 545846032144008452229💔16❤1
Signed القناص
Она умерла, думая, что я её ненавижу. Это последнее, что я ей сказал
💔28custom 546090917864827853411custom 52625116254951294038
Signed القناص
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 526251162549512940341custom 546090917864827853430💔10
Signed coireolaí
буду дураком если не скажу,что счастлив,что в мире есть люди которые любят
custom 543816825023392850127custom 546090917864827853418custom 526251162549512940313
Signed coireolaí
🔗عبدا
custom 546090917864827853431custom 543816825023392850114custom 52625116254951294038
Signed coireolaí
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @egswex. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@egswex named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“الإطراء الحلو” (@egswex), 83 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/egswex.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.