Channel
@egrvmn
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
334subscribers
-16 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001713393403 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @egrvmn |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 8 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/egrvmn |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Sept 2026, 01:58 | 334 | -6 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 09:15 | 340 | -4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 344 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:02 | 347 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:48 | 350 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:54 | 350 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
135 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ✍ | 40 | 29.6% | |
| custom 5454347190174490271 | 30 | 22.2% | |
| custom 5927068990332475055 | 29 | 21.5% | |
| 🙏 | 17 | 12.6% | |
| custom 5210956306952758910 | 11 | 8.15% | |
| custom 5323759555648170266 | 8 | 5.93% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 135 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Напоминаю, что с 3 августа вы уже можете подать заявление на смену участка голосования на выборы в ГосДуму 9 созыва (если живете в РФ не по месту регистрации) 👀
✍5custom 59270689903324750551
Новости к этому часу:
custom 54543471901744902714
Когда руководитель не скинул ТЗ, данные, контакты и спустя два дня спрашивает, на ком застряла эта срочная задача:
✍8
Я постригся кст
custom 592706899033247505510✍5
Говоря о хайте рекламного ролика Эконики с Рози - я вообще считаю, что КАЖДОГО человека нужно буквально силой заталкивать в магазины бренда, чтобы они покупали минимум постоянную коллекцию, а в норме - только айтемы из новой 🤔 Потому что с кем, за сколько и кто делает коллаборацию - это точно дело людей, это 100% делается на их налоги и не может ни коим образом быть делом и интересом лично бренда Думайте.
✍3custom 54543471901744902713🙏2
И восстали ОНИ из пепла ядерного огня...
custom 545434719017449027110
Корпоративная культура в России - В С Ё.
✍6custom 59270689903324750552
Выложил пост и вспомнил, как хотел себе узкий прямоугольник или с толстой оправой, или полупрозрачной металлической Посмотрел картинки и рил задумался….
custom 59270689903324750555
Рассматриваю смену очков, полистал пинтерест и вот такие оправы как будто прям ХОРОШО выглядят Заметил недавно, что мне идут скругленные формы и наверное буду ориентироваться на них 🖱
custom 59270689903324750555custom 53237595556481702664
Я в отношениях сикссевен 😞
custom 52109563069527589107custom 54543471901744902714
Хапает классов на Паше Дурове
custom 52109563069527589102
Вещь, которую я хочу УДАЛИТЬ со всех маркетплейсов: убогие поло в рубчик для «бежевых пап» . Я не знаю, какой идиот продолжает форсить этот понос чистоганный, но вот прошло уже типа 2 года, а этот элемент всё ещё активно встречается не только в рекомендациях маркетплейсов, но и в реальной жизни. Я без рофла за это лето видел мужчин 5-7 со своими бежевыми гёрлами в этих поло. И с 80% шансов, я уверен, что ему их по…
🙏5✍3custom 52109563069527589102
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @egrvmn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“VMN” (@egrvmn), 334 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/egrvmn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.