Channel
@egrajohni
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
67subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002539682511 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @egrajohni |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/egrajohni |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:30 | 67 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:18 | 67 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 6 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
114 reactions across 14 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 35 | 30.7% | |
| custom 5283199014081159898 | 16 | 14.0% | |
| 🔥 | 15 | 13.2% | |
| custom 5211030691491378292 | 12 | 10.5% | |
| custom 5381935385888709649 | 12 | 10.5% | |
| custom 5381817128259183792 | 5 | 4.39% | |
| 😭 | 5 | 4.39% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 3.51% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 2.63% | |
| custom 5379697055092465980 | 2 | 1.75% | |
| custom 5411178478177377993 | 2 | 1.75% | |
| custom 5377353042330935012 | 1 | 0.877% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 0.877% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 0.877% |
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 114reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 6 September 2025 to 22 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🎀elcome to the. . . 🤩 😀 @.You and me and her: a love story cf + daily ! 💉 🍓 ✨: В данном конфешионе/дейли вы можете поделиться/посмотреть на творчество и всё, что связано с новеллой «You And Me And Her: A Love Story»🪦 ✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️ ✏️Виша (влд, отвечает за все) 🏁 {🌟} ✏️Наполеон (адм по тейкам) 🏁 {🌟/🍰} ✏️Коффа (адм по вп) 🏁 {🔌} ✏️Шока (адм по вп) 🏁 {⚡/🍧} ✏️Блендер (адм, отвечает за всë) 🏁 {🌟} ✏…
Эграсджоны>>> Над головой Джона стаей взлетели и раскаркались вороны. На руку упали несколько капель, вызвав дрожь. Скоро дождь. «Ещё чуть-чуть», — до заветного плода, угодившего прямо в кусты архейского большого шиповника, оставалось каких-то пару жалких миллиметров, Джон был почти у цели. С помощью магии вытаскивать его мироходец не хотел, ведь именно из-за неё нужный ингредиент для его эликсира оказался среди ко…
❤5🔥1
я только сейчас заметил что один тейк случайно удалили... вместе с вп видимо, сейчас верну 😭
😭5❤1
ну какие сладкие cr: @im_Raine #адмтейк
custom 52110306914913782928🔥6custom 53818171282591837923❤🔥2
видос с плейлистом получается больше часа... #щп
custom 53819353858887096494custom 52831990140811598983custom 53818171282591837921
завтра, в 19:00 мск приём предложений закрывается, и я начну оформлять плейлист, так что успевайте!
К сожалению, нас покинул администратор, поэтому набор... актуален как никогда?! Даже если у вас нет опыта — не стесняйтесь, главное желание, а я если что помогу !
🔥4❤2
https://telegra.ph/Svidanie-so-Svyatym-CHast-1-09-21 небольшая зарисовка с потенциальным продолжением, если вам понравится — @neileart #адмтейк
custom 52831990140811598982
По результатам голосования мы с вами, друзья, делаем плейлист! Присылайте в комментарии песни, которые ассоциируются у вас с эграджонами, на любом языке, а я объединю это всё в одно видео. Должно получиться минимум 10 песен! Можно как файлами, так и название-автор. Максимум 4 трека от одного человека, так что выбирайте тщательно. Я начну: #интерактив
❤5custom 53818171282591837921
СМОТРИТЕ ШО В ПИНТЕРЕСТЕ ПОПАЛОСЬ #адмтейк
❤8custom 52831990140811598983🔥2
спонтанные рассуждения пересматривал сейчас сердце вселенной и обратил внимание на одну интересную деталь в 39 серии Джон, по сути, видел обрывки детства Эграсселя — и в начале даже спутал их со своими воспоминаниями. Из чего можно сделать вывод, что их детство было схожим — правда у Джона не было стремления помочь своему отцу. Это, можно сказать, общая травма — что могло бы стать одной из возможностей их сближения,…
❤4custom 52831990140811598982
эдит!! cr: https://www.tiktok.com/@povelitel.kakichi.228 #адмтейк
custom 52831990140811598983custom 54111784781773779932
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @egrajohni. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
интерактив?
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
как отмечать будем?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 6 September 2025 to 22 November 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,343,990 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@egrajohni named 6 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🧡Эграджоны confession📖” (@egrajohni), 67 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/egrajohni.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.