Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for egor.cg

Channel

egor.cg

@egorcginstagram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

826subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 28 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001681214031
TypeChannel
Username@egorcginstagram
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded28 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/egorcginstagram

Growth

82282682428 August 2026 — 822 subscribers29 August 2026 — 822 subscribers7 September 2026 — 826 subscribers28 August 20267 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 10 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 821–827 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 18:18826+4
29 Aug 2026, 02:25822no change
28 Aug 2026, 20:30822first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.3%
avg views ÷ 826 subscribers
Avg views / post
275
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held11 (7 August 202628 August 2026)
Views total2,199
Reactions total183
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 20:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
26s
Average length
26s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

290 reactions across 11 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥8529.3%
❤‍🔥6923.8%
custom 52445443900215319544314.8%
custom 53620810792241803633411.7%
🥰186.21%
😁134.48%
custom 525812291624292793662.07%
💯41.38%
😱41.38%
custom 540470859957220973031.03%
🎉31.03%
🤔31.03%
🦄31.03%
20.69%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 290 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 11 we hold a reading for · 55%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @egorcginstagram. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTC78 views15 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

а у вас тоже бывают навязчивые мысли, которые никак из головы не идут 🤔 #Егор_нарисовал #ма_гёрлз

❤‍🔥11💯4

Signed Egor Zh

28 Aug 2026, 00:05 UTC151 views19 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

привет, спишь? #Егор_рисует #ма_гёрлз

custom 536208107922418036313🤔3custom 54047085995722097302🔥1

Signed Egor Zh

22 Aug 2026, 16:39 UTC300 views7 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Я тут подумал и решил, что много каналов не бывает. И завёл канал для своих рандомных фоток Те, что сюда не запостишь, а в сторисах они пропадают бесследно 📸 В общем, заходите, подписывайтесь, кто знает, может на следующем фото окажетесь вы 💋

😱4🔥3

Signed Egor Zh

21 Aug 2026, 18:14 UTC268 views33 reactions2 Starsread 28 August 2026
Photo

А помните, помните, я делал обложку для книжки Лизы? Гляньте на этого счастливого человека) 🐸🐸🐸 Я кстати тоже радуюсь

🔥18❤‍🔥6🥰6🎉3

Signed Egor Zh

15 Aug 2026, 19:27 UTC385 views44 reactions1 Starread 28 August 2026
Photo

я настолько преисполнился, что успел ещё одну композицию по референсу сделать. немного вольный пересказ получился, правда. в коментах, как всегда, сами знаете что #Егор_нарисовал #ма_гёрлз

🔥24custom 536208107922418036312custom 52445443900215319545custom 52581229162429279363

Signed Egor Zh

14 Aug 2026, 17:44 UTC349 views35 reactions1 Starread 28 August 2026
Photo

короче это было люто. какой-то сложный ракурс у рефа, плюс ещё стилизация пропорций. и в итоге не то чтоб прям получилось упростить рендер ..но работаем над этим #Егор_нарисовал #ма_гёрлз

❤‍🔥30🔥3🦄2

Signed Egor Zh

12 Aug 2026, 19:01 UTC361 views10 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Регулярная рубрика «почему мы выбрали именно Порту»

😁10

Signed Egor Zh

12 Aug 2026, 13:42 UTC307 views20 reactions1 Starread 28 August 2026
Photo

короче у Хиары тут снова порисуй по рефам, которые она подобрала (присоединяйтесь, кстати) а там такая парочка прекрасная, что мне просто нельзя такое пропускать. но по факту, успеть бы хоть один скетчик сделать. буду пробовать упрощать рендер и не копаться в деталях #Егор_рисует #ма_гёрлз

🥰12❤‍🔥7🦄1

Signed Egor Zh

9 Aug 2026, 09:04 UTC388 views52 reactions1 Starread 28 August 2026
Photo

Тадаа! 🤗 девичий досуг на диване. холст масло фотошоп. спросите - а чего это они такие одетые? а я отвечу - в инстаграм же тоже надо что-то выкладывать 🐸🐸🐸 кстати, чё думаете - ну теперь то уже пора онлифанс или патреон заводить? для самых любознательных, как всегда бонус в коментах #Егор_нарисовал #ма_гёрлз

custom 524454439002153195423❤‍🔥15custom 53620810792241803636🔥5custom 52581229162429279363

Signed Egor Zh

7 Aug 2026, 17:26 UTC343 views27 reactions1 Starread 28 August 2026
Photo

короче к чему этот движ с головами. вчера начал рендерить девочек и внезапно осознал, что у Лилит скетч лица перестаёт работать когда пытаешься разобраться с его объёмом. пришлось останавливать раскочегаренную машину рендера и идти разбираться с головой. в процессе я ещё и положение руки поменял, чтоб ладошку было видно (а не просто два обрубка) ну короче стало явно лучше. теперь надо проверить как сработает этот лай

🔥20😁3custom 53620810792241803633custom 54047085995722097301

Signed Egor Zh

7 Aug 2026, 11:54 UTC350 views28 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Гайз, смотрите че нашёл. https://angleref.com/ Подбиралка референсов для любых ракурсов головы Больше никаких проблем со смотрящей вверх Фрирен 🐶 #хозяйке_на_заметку

custom 524454439002153195415🔥112

Signed Egor Zh

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @egorcginstagram. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

CGSpeak
@cgspeaks · 43,111
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“egor.cg” (@egorcginstagram), 826 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/egorcginstagram.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.