2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 201–203 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 11:20
202
no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:12
202
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 25 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
27
Videos
1
Links
38
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
352 reactions across 19 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
105
29.8%
❤
100
28.4%
👍
94
26.7%
🎉
12
3.41%
🥰
11
3.13%
👏
10
2.84%
custom 5199464254368935081
8
2.27%
⚡
3
0.852%
🐳
3
0.852%
🤔
3
0.852%
👎
2
0.568%
😁
1
0.284%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 352reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2025 to 20 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
49
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 19 we hold a reading for · 79%
Most on one post
13
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @eggonomic. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 June 2025 to 20 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
TeleGifts 1.7.1 теперь доступно в App Store 🤖
И да — Plush Redo теперь наш новый символ 🎁
Если вы читаете это, вы и есть - сопротивление.
Что нового в 1.7.1:
• Покупка подарков в приложении
Сравнивайте живые предложения прямо в приложении через Swift Gifts
• Новая тепловая карта
Выявляйте лидеров по объёму, движению рынка и активности гораздо быстрее
• Улучшения виджета и приложения
Отслеживание избранного тепе…
Яйца уже доступны для вывода. Если вы и так планировали фиксировать их в Stars или, например, взять себе Telegram Premium, логичнее сделать это сразу через наш сервис.
Сейчас в PlatinPay уже работает:
— покупка Telegram Stars
— покупка Telegram Premium на 3–12 месяцев
— пополнение баланса подарками по рыночным ценам
— пополнение токенами сети TON
Почему это удобно именно сейчас:
— вы можете сразу завести подарок на…
🆙 Eggonomic 2.0
Основная фаза стартовала! Обновленная версия мини-приложения прошла тестирование и уже доступна каждому.
Новые механики, улучшенный интерфейс и расширенные возможности — обо всем этом мы расскажем совсем скоро. Оставайтесь с Eggonomic! 🐰
Channel | Chat | Mini App
🎁 Eggonomic среди лидеров DeFi!
Проект отмечен TON CIS Hub как один из самых ярких в категории DeFi за Q3’25!
Мы стараемся привнести что-то новое и инновационное в активно развивающуюся экосистему Telegram-подарков.
Отдельная благодарность всем, кто верит, поддерживает, и участвует в Eggonomic — ваша активность вдохновляет двигаться дальше. 🤫
Channel | Chat | Mini App
🏆 Итоги конкурса для тестеров
Вы совершили сотни свапов — это помогло нам собрать ценные данные и улучшить работу приложения. Призы уже отправлены победителям:
▪️ @dunkanicloud — Easter Egg Koshchei
▪️ @abso_lutt — Easter Egg Koshchei
▪️ @aeshtlv — Easter Egg
▪️ @j011453 — Easter Egg
▪️ @sergeche — Easter Egg
Продолжайте делать свапы — статистика остается активной, и самые вовлеченные пользователи получат дополните…
🏆 Конкурс для тестеров!
Совершите свап любого токена или TON → более 100 Stars через наш виджет и получите шанс выиграть призы:
— 2 Easter Egg Koshchei
— 3 Easter Egg
— Дополнительные награды за самые крупные свапы
⏱ Начало: 8 октября, 20:00 UTC (сегодня)
⏱ Завершение: 12 октября, 23:59 UTC (воскресенье)
Channel | Chat | Mini App
⏱️ Публичное бета-тестирование уже стартовало!
В течение 7 дней для тестирования доступен новый функционал — Stars Swap, виджет для обмена токенов на звезды. Мы собираем обратную связь и проверяем работоспособность.
Дополнительно открыт тестовый доступ к части будущего обновления — инвентарю подарков.
⚠️ Это бета-версия: возможны ошибки и нестабильная работа отдельных функций, будьте внимательны!
Channel | Chat |…
📁 Gift Explore обновился — множество новых функций уже доступно!
В @GiftExploreBot взаимодействие с подарками вышло на новый уровень: добавлены лайки и просмотры.
Поиск стал удобнее и быстрее, увеличено количество бесплатных запросов.
Благодаря Gift Asset API появилась более детальная аналитика подарков, позволяющая подробно ознакомиться с интересующими вас предметами.
☺️ Кроме того, реализовано множество других …
🏴 sGIFT — первый индекс Telegram-подарков, сформированный из 15 крупнейших коллекций!
С помощью Gift Asset API данные агрегируются со всех ведущих маркетплейсов и превращаются в математически выверенный индекс.
Этот инструмент позволяет зарабатывать как на росте, так и на падении рынка благодаря фьючерсной торговле на ⚡️ Storm Trade с плечом до 3х.
🔗 Узнайте подробнее, как работает индекс!
🔥7⚡3👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @eggonomic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 914,434 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Eggonomic” (@eggonomic), 202 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eggonomic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.