我不知道有多少人在我这里买了gg卡的。也不知道这条消息还有多少人能看到,如果你的gg卡还有余额并且联系agent被拒绝退款的话,可以通过 https://www.giffgaff.com/complaints/new?step=complaint 发起投诉,我这边的投诉客服已经同意了退回余额,如果不行的话找这个投诉客服或者agent要一份正式的Deadlock Letter后去 https://www.commsombudsman.org/raise-dispute/giffgaff 进行投诉

Channel
efq杂货铺
@efqstore
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
812subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001463953168 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @efqstore |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/efqstore |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:57 | 812 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:43 | 811 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:35 | 812 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:22 | 812 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 22 March 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 22.2%
- avg views ÷ 812 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 180
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (22 March 2024 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 180 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 16:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
最近好多人来问我还有没有gg卡了,我只能说我还有上百张,但我不是很想卖,因为我现在有正经工作了,不是很想搞这些有风险的事情,熟人可以来找我要,不熟的还是别来了
创建了专门玩狼人杀的游戏群 @naixiwolf https://t.me/naixiwolf
已经跑路了,下次去之前还会再频道里面通知的
#题外话 香港的银行服务真的是慢的离谱
预计1月4号去一趟香港,带老师去开户,如果想要帮忙带什么的可以私聊,以前没干过代购,不知道是个什么样的流程,可以先来问问看
另外有人需要香港代购服务吗?跑了那么多次香港之后才发现可以做代购回血,详细可以私聊
话说一直没在频道里面发过,我这里多出一张这个,肉身从香港带回的,120不包邮有人要不,看淘宝奸商要卖150不包邮,正在考虑去香港批量购入带回
我突然感觉我又卖便宜了,二手🐴上居然有开价45的,剩下的几张不卖了,留着自用和给同学朋友
这两天没看消息,晚点再回复
刚问了下,才发现自己跟不上时代了,现在Android不需要root了,下载这个就可以了 https://www.estk.me/downloads/
还有就是以前的测试原生Android(指pixel这种)可以把这种esim卡直接识别为esim设备,可以切卡删卡但好像不能写卡(我是没找到地方)
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @efqstore. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@efqstore named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“efq杂货铺” (@efqstore), 812 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/efqstore.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.