Channel
@effyefis
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
27subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 9 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003263862601 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @effyefis |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/effyefis |
Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 3 November 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Nov 2026, 16:26 | 27 | +2 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 22:24 | 25 | no change |
| 9 Sept 2026, 14:47 | 25 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 14 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
185 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5399888628358855518 | 45 | 24.3% | |
| custom 5805445970460152583 | 45 | 24.3% | |
| custom 5249230620248258089 | 30 | 16.2% | |
| custom 5920537225543553922 | 30 | 16.2% | |
| custom 5260587772204323915 | 18 | 9.73% | |
| custom 5224681085400551597 | 11 | 5.95% | |
| custom 5316679430909732521 | 6 | 3.24% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 185 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2026 to 10 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Кажется, возвращаюсь к своему любимому фиолетовому 💜 (В далеких 18-19 годах мои арты были нарисованы цветами, не теплее холодно-красного и бирюзового. Тогда была жесткая непереносимость жёлтого и оранжевого. Сегодня мне они кажутся тоже классными) В коммах без надписей #efart
custom 53998886283588555184custom 58054459704601525834custom 52492306202482580893custom 59205372255435539221
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 Облик Астарота содержится в «Лемегетоне», где демон описывается как безобразный* ангел, восседающий на адском звере, подобным дракону, и держащий в правой руке гадюку. *Согласно «Псевдомонархи демонов» Иоганна Вейера — прекрасный ангел. #efart
custom 58054459704601525838custom 52246810854005515975custom 53998886283588555184
🔶🔶🔶🔶🔶 🔶🔶🔶🔶🔶🔶 🔶🔶🔶🔶🔶🔶 🔶🔶🔶🔶🔶 Трепещи, мир: из самых глубин преисподней на свет явились они — демоны Гоэтии! Посмотрите на этих величественных, злобных и обворожительных мерзавцев, которые не только украдут вашу душу, но и сердце. Над этой красотой старались демонологи, прошедшие семь кругов ада🔤 Король Баал — @tarelochka_supa Герцог Агарес — @forestlessa Маркиз Аамон — @volchok_risyet Король Пеймон — @Archives_813 …
custom 59205372255435539223
🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤 #efart
custom 58054459704601525836custom 53998886283588555185custom 52492306202482580893custom 59205372255435539223
🦷 🤩 🦷 Тяжело рендер даëтся, долго и мучительно. Всë в процессе, всë рисуется. А пока своё отсутствие заполняю этой работой #efart
custom 58054459704601525836custom 59205372255435539226custom 52605877722043239153
Кошмар, буду работать над скоростью, слишком много времени уходит на простые головы😳 А ведь у меня ещё более крупные работы в процессе висят. Следующим, надеюсь, дропнуть ту картинку, которую как спойлер присылала
custom 58054459704601525838custom 52605877722043239155custom 53998886283588555185custom 52492306202482580891
Сделала зарисовку по мудборду в перерывах от больших работ. Устала от долгих процессов, хотелось чего то свежего🍰🍨 *** «Это уже произошло - живи дальше» © человек из Реддита. Вообще не в тему, но мне откликнулось, решила поделиться #efart
custom 59205372255435539227custom 52492306202482580893custom 53998886283588555183custom 58054459704601525831
Зарисовки 😳 #efart
custom 52246810854005515976custom 52492306202482580895custom 53998886283588555185
Просто рисую челиков, набиваю руку к ивенту В коммах будет без надписи P. S. Бытует мнение, что все Цезари в манхвах не оч. Например, как в манхве "how to get my husband on my side". Имя ему выбирала согласно этому мнению #efart
custom 52492306202482580896custom 58054459704601525833custom 53998886283588555182custom 59205372255435539222
Ещё выложу аватарку Вот #efart
custom 58054459704601525839custom 52492306202482580895custom 53998886283588555183
После сессии появился страх белого листа. Только боюсь испортить работу не только вначале, но и после каждого этапа: скетч, цвета, рендер. Но буду чаще рисовать, в надежде, что само пройдет. 🤡 Его я могла, конечно, ещё больше вымучить, но он не 😟 #efart
custom 53998886283588555187custom 53166794309097325216custom 52605877722043239155custom 52492306202482580891
Channel photo updated
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @effyefis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@effyefis named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“effyEfis печатает...” (@effyefis), 27 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/effyefis.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.