Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for effortless

Channel

effortless

@effortlessclo

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry

797subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002261217957
TypeChannel
Username@effortlessclo
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/effortlessclo

Growth

7978 Aug 2026, 02:16 — 797 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 15:09 — 797 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 02:168 Aug 2026, 15:09
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 796–798 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 15:09797no change
8 Aug 2026, 02:16797first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 29 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.1%
avg views ÷ 797 subscribers
Avg views / post
232
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.47%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held10 (29 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,393
Reactions total118
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 02:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5s
Average length
5s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

206 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52894778826057706236230.1%
custom 53819840220983714835325.7%
custom 52899423360741949213115.0%
3014.6%
custom 5292193921139517355199.22%
💔115.34%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 206reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 10 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @effortlessclo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 14:43 UTC81 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ваши отзывы 🫂 нам очень приятно слышать от вас приятные слова и видеть в соц сетях фотографии и тик токи в effortless 🪽

custom 528947788260577062311custom 52899423360741949217custom 538198402209837148351

2 Aug 2026, 15:55 UTC176 views20 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

graphite longsleeve 🪽 2790₽ 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟 • лонгслив легко сочетать с другими элементами гардероба, он подходит как для повседневных, так и для особенных образов. фраза на нем переводится как: [смысл жизни в том , чтобы умереть молодым , как можно позже]. p.s. это фотография нашего клиента предзаказ ,отправка 4-8 дней effortless-clothes.ru поддержка

custom 528947788260577062395custom 53819840220983714835custom 52921939211395173551

26 Jul 2026, 20:38 UTC254 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

кроме графитовых зип-худи также напоминаем , что больше нет в наличии(проданы): 🤩 gray zip sweatshirt 🤩 burgundy zip sweatshirt 🤩 black zip sweatshirt 🤩 striped olive sweater 🤩 striped dark-blue sweater в наличии/предзаказ: 🤩 black prime top 🤩 burgundy prime top 🤩 white L’AMOUR t-shirt 🤩 graphite pants 🤩 graphite long sleeve 🚘black porsche long sleeve 🚘white porsche long sleeve ☔️money loves silence t

6custom 52894778826057706235custom 53819840220983714834

26 Jul 2026, 20:20 UTC243 views33 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Graphite Zip-Hoodie SOLD OUT ❌ ваша самая любимая позиция закончилась 🪦 если вы захотите ресток , то дайте знать реакциями/личными сообщениями в поддержку 🪦 многие спрашивают про новые зип-худи и низ — планируем осенью при вашей активности 🪽

💔11custom 528947788260577062310custom 538198402209837148384

18 Jul 2026, 12:00 UTC314 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 52894778826057706233custom 52921939211395173553custom 53819840220983714832

18 Jul 2026, 12:00 UTC325 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

L’AMOUR NE MEURT JAMAIS VRAIMENT x3 🤩 наша футболка на французском — беспроигрышный вариант на лето , в котором мы будете привлекать внимание окружающих 💯 p.s. самое популярная позиция после зип-худи 🪽effortless-clothes.ru 🪽поддержка в тг

custom 52894778826057706236custom 53819840220983714836custom 529219392113951735551

13 Jul 2026, 14:20 UTC369 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

L’AMOUR NE MEURT JAMAIS VRAIMENT 🇫🇷 2490₽ 🪦🪦 🌟〽️🌟 effortless.ru 🌟☦️🌟 купить через телеграмм , с бесплатной доставкой по спб

custom 528947788260577062396custom 53819840220983714836custom 52899423360741949213

5 Jul 2026, 20:18 UTC419 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

burgundy prime top 🤩 🪦🪦🪦 2290₽🪦 effortless-clothes.ru

custom 52899423360741949218custom 52894778826057706235custom 538198402209837148351

1 Jul 2026, 08:35 UTC477 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

✨graphite zip-hoodie ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 4590₽ effortless-clothes.ru —вышивка по всей длинне рукавов и капюшона —графитовая плотная и качественная ткань с начесом (в любое время года будет комфортно) —оверсайз укороченный крой + качественная фурнитура —в наличии с быстрой отправкой 🔗 купить в тг

custom 52899423360741949219custom 53819840220983714836custom 528947788260577062343

29 Jun 2026, 14:47 UTC438 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

⭐⭐⭐⭐ ⭐⭐⭐⭐ спасибо за ваши заказы! топы btw my prime is now все еще доступны , в наличии с быстрой отправкой 🪽🤩 effortless-clothes.ru купить через тг

custom 529219392113951735510custom 53819840220983714836custom 528994233607419492143

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @effortlessclo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,287,728 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“effortless” (@effortlessclo), 797 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/effortlessclo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.