5 measurements spanning 15 days, net -940. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Sept 2026, 16:39
1
-938
27 Aug 2026, 19:08
939
-13
21 Aug 2026, 06:17
952
+11
20 Aug 2026, 08:00
941
no change
20 Aug 2026, 07:45
941
first reading
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 18 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
449 reactions across 7 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5251711011106355297
98
21.8%
custom 5451934543835575239
73
16.3%
custom 5354803540608955867
66
14.7%
custom 5244897139980529022
56
12.5%
custom 5330499347178097807
39
8.69%
custom 5377815185106946246
29
6.46%
custom 5226901935679901671
26
5.79%
custom 5375222180206371473
20
4.45%
custom 5375566928641287609
16
3.56%
custom 5325953416353053838
11
2.45%
custom 5330355912450281598
8
1.78%
custom 5262480074665385389
7
1.56%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 449 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 18 January 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 7 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @eeveeshouse. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 January 2026 to 16 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
С первопостом (даже не перезалив). Старое промо страдающее и лагающее, поэтому пусть будет просто сообщение, а не статья.
Буду рада, если проявите фидбек на новой работе. Хотя считаю её не особо сильной и вообще можно было написать больше, но оформление нравится
🌟 | Индуцированное бредовое расстройство.
🔎 : #presentation // источник: –
📡 : видео в тик-токе.
🌟Все мои статьи/посты создаются и публикуются для поверхностного ознакомления конкретного тезиса. Я не претендую на стопроцентную точность той информации, которой делюсь здесь.
🖤 канал ; поддержать бустом.
🌟🌟🌟🌟⠀ 🤍elcome to my channel!🤩🖤🤩
🌟🦢 Before you follow : публикую статьи, связанные с психологией и психиатрией. иногда рассуждаю на темы, интересные лично мне. Канал – попытка в создание собственного архива, я могу пропадать в зависимости от своей загруженности. Сердечно ценю всех, кто со мной 🤩
➡Пожалуйста, не пишите в комментарии и в моего бота просьбы написать про что-то конкретное. Сделайте это в личных сообщени…
Тг добавил статьи в сообщения, но не оптимизировал их...
Мне будет удобнее читать информацию в телеграфах, тг статьи займут больше места в канале30%
Мне удобен вариант и с телеграфами, и со статьями76%
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Во-первых, статьи – неоптимизированное дерьмо, завтра с ПК придётся выравнивать промо снова.
Во-вторых, завтра дроп поста (наконец-то) и переход к стабильной работе канала. Очень надеюсь, что он не флопнется опять, потому что моё самочувствие всё ещё хромает на одну ногу.
Всем привет ещё раз, давно не виделись
📼 | ДИАГРАММА ДРЕВА ЖИЗНИ на примере древа жизни из иудаизма (кабалла).
🔎 : #presentation // источник: –
📡 : видео в тик-токе.
🌟Все мои статьи/посты создаются и публикуются для поверхностного ознакомления конкретного тезиса. Я не претендую на стопроцентную точность той информации, которой делюсь здесь.
🍡 канал ; поддержать бустом.
🤩 | СТЕРЕОТИП ОБ ИДЕАЛЬНОЙ ЖЕРТВЕ В МЕДИА : или почему люди не должны забывать, что каждый переносит психологическую травму по-разному.
🔎 : #presentation // источник: –
📡 : видео в тик-токе.
🌟Все мои статьи/посты создаются и публикуются для поверхностного ознакомления конкретного тезиса. Я не претендую на стопроцентную точность той информации, которой делюсь здесь.
🤩🤩 канал ; поддержать бустом.
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @eeveeshouse. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Тг добавил статьи в сообщения, но не оптимизировал их...
Мне будет удобнее читать информацию в телеграфах, тг статьи займут больше места в канале30%
Мне удобен вариант и с телеграфами, и со статьями76%
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 18 January 2026 to 16 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Привет” (@eeveeshouse), 1 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eeveeshouse.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.