Channel
@eeschastlivoeserdce
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
299subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001732093527 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @eeschastlivoeserdce |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/eeschastlivoeserdce |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 40% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 15:21 | 299 | -1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 07:56 | 300 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:02 | 299 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 09:17 | 300 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:03 | 299 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:54 | 299 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 1 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
154 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 96 | 62.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 24 | 15.6% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 8.44% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 5.84% | |
| 🙏 | 5 | 3.25% | |
| ✍ | 3 | 1.95% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 1.95% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.649% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 154 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 February 2025 to 6 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @eeschastlivoeserdce. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 February 2025 to 6 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
8/ Итак, я отвечаю на ваш вопрос. Мужчине не нужно задавать вопросы, чтобы проверить его зрелость. Зрелый мужчина спокойно говорит сам о своих страхах, стыде и боли. И это не останавливает его действие в мире ради большей, чем он, цели.
👍5❤🔥3✍2
3/ Мужчина, который не оплакал в себе мальчика, который не оправдал ожидания, или даже если оправдал, но все равно недостаточен, никогда не вырастет, не будет зрелым.
❤3
Вот еще прекрасные сообщения от Михаила Саидова.
Как увидеть зрелость мужчины. Трэд:
❤1
1/ Путь зрелости мужчины лежит через любовь к своей поломанности и несовершенности. Каждый раз, когда мужчина выдыхает свой стыд, мир выдыхает вместе с ним.
❤3
2/ Уверенность, сила, маскулинность - это все бутафория. Ничего из этого не поможет, если мужчина не нашел свою поломанность и не отпустил ее.
❤2
4/ Большинство мужчин даже не знают, что они поломаны. Их грандиозность и пренебрежение хорошо это скрывают.
❤3
5/ Любого мужчину они воспринимают как конкурента. Женщину как обьект. Материальные достижения как опору самооценки. И все это в попытке заслужить любовь и восхищение.
❤4
6/ Когда ты что-то делаешь, чтобы заслужить любовь, ты поломан. Ты ищешь в женщинах матерей и наказываешь в них свою мать.
❤4
7/ Все мужчины должны действовать. Здоровое действие служит чему-то большему, чем ты. Не для того, чтобы тебя любили, а потому что так надо. Потому что так проявляется твоя собственная любовь к жизни.
❤4
Смыть старую кожу: Глубокая женская мистерия перерождения в Геленджике, Пшада. Вам знакомо состояние, когда тело стало каменным от контроля, ум разрывается от мыслей, а внутри — звенящая, холодная усталость? Когда ты везешь на себе всё и понимаешь: старая кожа уже жмет, а как жить по-новому — ты не знаешь. Женской психике необходима точка тотального обнуления. Место, где можно выключить контроль и позволить себе пе…
❤3👍1
Приглашаем мужчин и женщин на совместное обсуждение сериала «Махакали. Конец — это начало» Дорогие друзья! Мы — Виталий и Ксения Демченко — с огромной теплотой и волнением запускаем цикл встреч, где будем вместе смотреть и обсуждать один из самых глубоких и трансформирующих индийских сериалов о пути Богини — «Махакали». Когда мы впервые смотрели этот сериал, мы оба плакали. Слёзы шли не от грусти, а от узнавания. …
❤🔥7❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @eeschastlivoeserdce. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Формула отношений” (@eeschastlivoeserdce), 299 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eeschastlivoeserdce.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.