Channel
@eendilluminati
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
232subscribers
+9 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002129065774 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @eendilluminati |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/eendilluminati |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:54 | 232 | +2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:27 | 230 | +4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:35 | 226 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:31 | 223 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:33 | 223 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
19 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 9 | 47.4% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 21.1% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 10.5% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 10.5% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 5.26% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 5.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 October 2024 to 28 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 @itsallmaad British sociologist David Miller has said that the modern concept of “Islamic terrorism” was deliberately constructed by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Zionist political networks in the 1980s to justify Western backed genocide in the Middle East. Miller argues that the narrative was designed to frame conflicts involving Muslim societies as a global security threat, making military ac…
❤2🤔1
Video, posted without a caption
Imagine flipping the roles for a moment. If Iran launched missiles at Washington, eliminated the U.S. president, generals, diplomats—what label would dominate headlines? Terrorism. Aggression. An unforgivable act. Now reverse it again. When the same scale of force is used against Tehran, when leaders and officials are killed, the language suddenly softens. It becomes a “preemptive strike,” a “defensive necessity.” …
👍4❤1
@vltrasociety In 1992, visionary whistleblower Bill Cooper dropped a chilling truth bomb on his radio show: Israel was deliberately engineered as the ultimate instrument to ignite the prophesied Battle of Armageddon—a cataclysmic clash between political Zionism and radical Islamic forces that would unleash unimaginable nuclear horror, devastate the world, and drive terrified humanity straight into the arms of a tyran…
👍1
Video, posted without a caption
❤1
https://archive.org/embed/europa-the-last-battle-podcast
👍2
Listen more here https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-paypal-presidency-part-ii-building-the-dark/id1551492441?i=1000701913642 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Technocracy is an operative system that has the goal of reconfiguration of the society by providing a social mechanism. A movement that came out in 1930s. Creating a social mechanism based on a sequence of functions that breaks the society. This is overseen by a tiny group of around 100 people called continental control and they have a CEO called a continental director. The level of social control inherent to tec…
Watch the whole interview 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
https://rumble.com/v5xad18-zionists-dictating-us-foreign-policy-horrifying-real-gaza-death-toll-range-.html
Video, posted without a caption
🚨SHOCKING REAL GAZA DEATH TOLL RANGE REVEALED Susan Abulhawa who was in Gaza twice during the ongoing genocide perpetrated by Israel conducted a study on the real death toll in Gaza and found that the likely death toll range was between 194,000-514,000 people!!!
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @eendilluminati. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@eendilluminati named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“EndIlluminati” (@eendilluminati), 232 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eendilluminati.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.