Channel
@eduraitings
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
862subscribers
+10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001676337595 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @eduraitings |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/eduraitings |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:15 | 862 | +10 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:50 | 852 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 852 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (28 November 2025 – 2 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,060 |
| Reactions total | 25 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 14:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
218 reactions across 17 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 74 | 33.9% | |
| 👍 | 65 | 29.8% | |
| 🔥 | 64 | 29.4% | |
| 🤝 | 7 | 3.21% | |
| ✍ | 3 | 1.38% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 1.38% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.917% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 218reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 November 2025 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
С удовольствием анонсирую продолжение работы над московскими рейтингами и звездами совместно с Машей Васильевой. Написали и разместили текст про результаты ЕГЭ в 2026 году: https://xn--90ab9acbge9f.xn--p1ai/rank-2026. Файлик со свежим рейтингом появится здесь чуть позже, пока смотрите на сайте.
🔥22✍3
Уважаемые коллеги по интересу к данным московских школ! Запускаю предварительный опрос вот на какую тему. Представьте, что информация о школах Москвы за несколько лет будет размещена на сайте с возможностью поиска, фильтрации и подбора предпочтительных параметров. Согласились бы вы поучаствовать в краудфандинге по поводу создания такого портала и на каких условиях?
❤6
Допускаете ли вы для себя возможность поддержать развитие проекта «Рейтинги школ Москвы» с его размещением на сайте-карте с расширенным набором данных за несколько лет и возможностями поиска школ?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤3
Сделал небольшой рейтинг районов Москвы, в которых школы набрали наибольшее количество звезд - от 6 до 30. И еще сделал дополнительную визуализацию по 10 направлениям - чем выделяются отдельные районы. Получилось любопытно. К примеру, район Аэропорт, в котором внезапно количество олимпиадных звезд сравнимо с Хамовниками. Или Таганский район из центра списка, в котором обнаружилось немало звезд ОГЭ. Ссылка на Яндекс…
❤5🔥2🤝1
Эта версия звездного рейтинга сводит в единое пространство частные и государственные школы. Общий принцип подсчетов тот же - соединить количество звезд и значения показателей по десяти номинациям. Всего в рейтинге 241 образовательная организация. Реализовал разделение рейтинга на пять сегментов по количеству учеников. Получилось более-менее ровно, звезды первых величин - в основном государственные школы, самые мален…
❤14👍5🔥5🤝1
Огромное спасибо за голосование! Учитывая внушительный перевес «лучше сделать», сделал ☺️ По старым ссылкам теперь открываются новые версии с нарисованными звездочками. Конечно, немедленно захотелось их раскрасить в разные цвета и вообще сделать каждой школе свой звездный логотип, но это в будущем ☺️ Доброй ночи!
👍15🤝5❤1
Добавить ли в звездный рейтинг количество звезд?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Вдруг понял, что рейтинг-то звездный, а количества звезд в табличке нет 😊 Поэтому небольшой опрос, буду признателен за ответы ☺️
И сразу звездный рейтинг частных школ Москвы по результатам последних четырех лет. Версия 1.1 по аналогии с рейтингом госшкол (внимание, рейтинг госшкол обновлен!) Список из 54 частных школ устроен так же, как список государственных ОО. Список возглавила школа Летово с семью звездами. Здесь тоже буду рад реакциям и комментариям 😊 А еще приветствую идеи, что посчитать дальше 😊 Ссылка на Яндекс-диске: https://disk.…
👍12❤6
Та-дам! На сцену выходит звездный рейтинг государственных школ Москвы по результатам последних четырех лет! Перед вами список из 187 госшкол, получивших хотя бы одну звезду в одной из десяти номинаций. Список упорядочен, во-первых, по количеству звезд (две школы получили 8 из 10 и возглавили список), а во-вторых, по суммарному занятому месту во всех рейтингах в соответствии с измеряемыми показателями. То есть каждый…
👍13❤9❤🔥3
Все-таки переделал результаты ЕГЭ и динамику результатов, учитывая микро-школы с количеством выпускников от 3 до 10. Добавил 15 звезд к результатам ЕГЭ и 4 звезды к динамике результатов ЕГЭ за три учебных года. Все файлы открываются по старым ссылкам, приведу здесь ссылки на Яндекс-диске. Результаты ЕГЭ, версия 2: https://disk.yandex.ru/i/tuMMnkhKqwIv2g Динамика ЕГЭ, версия 2: https://disk.yandex.ru/i/MhprIBKhIph…
🔥8❤1
И наконец, девятое созвездие из 50 школ учитывает динамику регионального этапа ВсОШ по результатам олимпиады с 2021/2022 по 2024/2025 учебные годы. Интересный эффект - в отличие от муниципального этапа, немалое количество школ в динамике результатов региона одновременно получили звезду и за результаты региона в 2024/25 учебном году. Иными словами, результаты регионального этапа растут последовательно, в отличие от р…
👍6❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @eduraitings. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Допускаете ли вы для себя возможность поддержать развитие проекта «Рейтинги школ Москвы» с его размещением на сайте-карте с расширенным набором данных за несколько лет и возможностями поиска школ?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Добавить ли в звездный рейтинг количество звезд?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 November 2025 to 2 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 403,075 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Рейтинги школ Москвы” (@eduraitings), 862 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eduraitings.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.