Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Шонов говорит

@edtechhacker

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

467subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001373616712
TypeChannel
Username@edtechhacker
DescriptionЭнтузиаст вайбкодинга. Пишу про AI-инструменты и мышление — для тех, кто хочет не догонять мир, а успевать за ним. Денис Шонов, обо мне: Shontech.ru
Created6 April 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/edtechhacker

Growth

4676 Aug 2026, 17:53 — 467 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 19:03 — 467 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 17:536 Aug 2026, 19:03
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 466–468 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 19:03467no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:53467first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
120
Videos
13
Links
215

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

64 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53976298062736488383046.9%
custom 54046522968459368731726.6%
custom 53639208026956171841523.4%
custom 525588321105714444023.13%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 64reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 March 2026 to 2 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Jun 2026, 20:50 UTC199 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Как рождение дочери смотивировало меня начать вайбкодить. Пятый месяц вайбкожу. Начал, когда родилась дочь. Пост для тех, у кого мало времени, но задач всё больше: стоит ли вообще начинать? Моя мотивация простая — убрать рутину из жизни. Каждый вечер открываю терминал и пишу: «claude, давай продолжим». Стек Предпочитаю Claude Code CLI через терминал — не десктоп, тк он упирался в лимиты коробки. Использую в основ

custom 53639208026956171847

26 Apr 2026, 21:19 UTC238 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Вайбкодинг от Бати, завел агенту учетку на гитхабе: Воскресный апдейт по вайбкодингу 👋 1. Настроил все основные инструменты. Open Claw и Claude Code работают через телегу. Что позволяет быть гибким в формате работы с ними. Сами сессии живут на макмини 24/7. 2. За вечер создал первую MVP сервиса, который позволяет работать с терминальным Claude code и Open Claw чисто через Airpods. Без единого использования клавиат

custom 53976298062736488386

1 Apr 2026, 19:54 UTC272 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

⚡️ Четверо астронавтов США через 2 часа полетят на Луну. Облетят и вернутся назад. Трансляция тут. А я тем временем запускаю Луну на новом мак мини м4 и гружу локальную qwen3:8b ☕️ . Следующий шаг моего проекта — подключить к локальному OpenClaw. @edtechhacker

custom 53639208026956171842custom 52558832110571444401custom 54046522968459368731

1 Apr 2026, 15:42 UTC228 viewsread 6 August 2026

Чему учиться и как придумывать идеи в эпоху ИИ? Меня пригласили выступить на конференции МАЙНД http://mindcon.online Уже как 3-й год (!) мы объединяем сильных спикеров и думающую аудиторию, чтобы вместе искать ответы на главный вопрос "Что действительно работает в обучении?" Я выступлю с темой «Лучший способ научить мозг чему-то новому в 2026 году — это немедленно что-то построить вместе с AI. Я покажу это на своё

31 Mar 2026, 15:44 UTC195 viewsread 6 August 2026

В сеть утек исходный код Claude Code агента. Один умелец уже собрал на его основе улучшенный навык по вайб-кодингу Вот его принцип: Скилл для сложных задач в кодинг-агентах (Claude Code, Codex). Решает главную проблему: агент говорит “готово” — а на самом деле нет. Или прерывается, и непонятно на каком этапе всё было.

24 Mar 2026, 16:20 UTC219 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Я сам был в шоке, когда узнал, что Буран прилетел с околоземной орбиты на Землю на автопилоте без ИИ в 1988 (!!!)— им управляла мультиагентная система. О чем это говорит? Порой важно понимать, что сценарии автоматизации с OpenClaw можно решить без ИИ на простом агенте. И даже мощное железо может оказаться избыточным. А мне кажется, это сейчас большая реальная проблема. Провайдеры LLM намеренно раздувают важность кр

custom 54046522968459368733

24 Mar 2026, 16:02 UTC184 viewsread 6 August 2026
Poll

А вы знали, что агентные системы могут работать и без ИИ/LLM🤖

  1. Да31%
  2. Неа23%
  3. Я с планеты Юпитер46%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Mar 2026, 04:16 UTC199 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

CEO NVIDIA представил защищенный Open Claw для корпораций — NemoClaw. 🚨 Посмотрел выступление Хуанга про Open claw. Он сравнил появление LINUX в свое время по значимости для всего рынка с созданием Open Claw. Openclaw это буквально новый класс компьютера. Каждая компания в мире будет agentic as a service компанией, где Claws будут самостоятельно общаться во вне, писать код и иметь доступ к корпоративным данным. Х

21 Mar 2026, 21:11 UTC170 viewsread 6 August 2026

Китай выложил официальный план своей пятилетки на 2026-2030. Она историческая. Я попросил LLM товарища Си (deepseek) кратко объяснить почему это так: Почему эта пятилетка историческая? Исторической её делают не формулировки, а три изменения, которые могут за ними последовать, если они реально прописаны: Переход от финансирования институтов к финансированию сквозных стеков Раньше: институт получает деньги на «иссле

21 Mar 2026, 20:10 UTC155 viewsread 6 August 2026

Зарелизили вчера антропики плагин, теперь МОЖНО ВАЙБКОДИТЬ с Claude через Телеграм. Установил и настроил, на моем экспериментальном сервере с open claw есть claude, управление которым теперь идет из телеги. Устанавливается за пару кликов. 1. Заводите бота 2. Устанавливаете на свой VPS с claude mcp сервер. Он соединяет бот в телеге с claude code 3. Настраиваете IAM политику, запрещаете для новых пользователей бота.

20 Mar 2026, 16:09 UTC152 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Вечер пятницы — новый марафон вайбкодинга. Решил пересобрать open claw. Чатик с темами позволяет держать контекст по топикам. Еще и приятная новость от Claude — в два раза увеличены лимиты в выходные + по ночам в будни до 28 марта @edtechhacker

custom 54046522968459368734custom 53639208026956171842custom 53976298062736488382

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @edtechhacker. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

24 Mar 2026, 16:02 UTCAnonymous Poll13 voters

А вы знали, что агентные системы могут работать и без ИИ/LLM🤖

  1. Да31%
  2. Неа23%
  3. Я с планеты Юпитер46%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 March 2026 to 2 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,048,696 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Шонов говорит” (@edtechhacker), 467 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/edtechhacker.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.