Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for عالم اقتصاد

Channel

عالم اقتصاد

@economyworld

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,476subscribers

-11 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001026461548
TypeChannel
Username@economyworld
CreatedBetween 1 January 2016 and 31 March 2016— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/economyworld

Growth

4,4764,4874,481.55 August 2026 — 4,487 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,487 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,486 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,487 subscribers12 August 2026 — 4,486 subscribers15 August 2026 — 4,480 subscribers18 August 2026 — 4,485 subscribers20 August 2026 — 4,478 subscribers24 August 2026 — 4,476 subscribers5 August 202624 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 19 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,474–4,489 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 21:544,476-2
20 Aug 2026, 22:074,478-7
18 Aug 2026, 02:424,485+5
15 Aug 2026, 01:534,480-6
12 Aug 2026, 04:544,486-1
9 Aug 2026, 08:214,487+1
6 Aug 2026, 13:334,486-1
6 Aug 2026, 04:034,487no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:054,487first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.8%
avg views ÷ 4,476 subscribers
Avg views / post
795
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.768%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held27 (1 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total21,473
Reactions total165
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

143 reactions across 25 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍6847.6%
4028.0%
👎1812.6%
🤔53.50%
👏42.80%
🎉32.10%
👌32.10%
🔥21.40%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 165reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 16:19 UTC256 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

وزارت خارجه امارات: این دزدی دریایی است. ما با شدیدترین لحن هدف قرار دادن یک نفتکش شرکت ادنوک با موشک هنگام عبور از تنگه هرمز را محکوم می‌کنیم.

👍2🔥1

8 Aug 2026, 04:44 UTC606 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

وزیر خزانه‌داری آمریکا: تنگه هرمز دیگر هرگز به وضع سابق خود باز نخواهد گشت 🔹تنگه هرمز دیگر هرگز به وضع سابق خود باز نخواهد گشت، زیرا ایرانی‌ها از آن به عنوان یک گلوگاه استفاده کرده‌اند، یا تلاش کرده‌اند از آن به همین منظور استفاده کنند. 🔹آنچه در دو سال آینده شاهد خواهیم بود، این است که تنگه هرمز از اهمیت خود کم خواهد شد. 🔹این تنگه به یک آبراه معمولی تبدیل خواهد شد، و من معتقدم که بیش از ۵۰ یا ۷۰ درصد از انرژی که د

🎉1👍1

8 Aug 2026, 04:36 UTC636 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ترامپ: نفت ایران را هم مثل ونزوئلا تصاحب می کنیم ترامپ: «داریم نفت زیادی یعنی میلیاردها بشکه نفت ونزوئلا را تصاحب می‌کنیم. غنایم برای برنده‌ست‌.با ایران هم همین کار را خواهیم کرد »! 👇👇 این همان بیشرفی است که میخواست مردم ایران را نجات دهد !

👍7👌3👎1🤔1

7 Aug 2026, 20:47 UTC734 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

«توافق کاغذی» با ترکیه و پاکستان برای عربستان سعودی امنیت نمی‌آورد. ریاض باید سیاست‌هایش را اصلاح کند تا نیازی به «گدایی امنیت» از دیگران نداشته باشد - عضو کمیسیون امنیت ملی مجلس ایران. دیگر پیش‌بینی نمی‌شود که فدرال رزرو در جلسه FOMC ماه سپتامبر نرخ بهره را افزایش دهد. 👇👇 افزایش ارزش طلا، نقره، ین و ... نسبت به دلار ... بسنت: ما آنها را از گلوگاه گرفته‌ایم و آنها تورم غذایی ۱۵۰ تا ۱۸۰ درصدی دارند و قادر به پردا

4👎3🤔1

7 Aug 2026, 20:38 UTC697 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

اگر این سه کشور واقعا اتحاد تشکیل دهند. و نه بصورت تشریفاتی...

👍1

7 Aug 2026, 04:32 UTC804 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

فارس: 🔹عبور شناورهای متعلق به آمریکا، رژیم صهیونیستی و سایر کشورهای متخاصم از تنگه هرمز ممنوع می‌شود. 🔹محموله‌های مرتبط با رژیم صهیونیستی، اعم از نظامی و غیرنظامی، حق تردد از این منطقه را نخواهند داشت. 🔹شناورها یا محموله‌هایی که در اقدامات علیه جبهه مقاومت نقش داشته باشند نیز مشمول ممنوعیت خواهند بود. 🔹کشورها و اشخاصی که به ایران خسارت وارد کرده‌اند، تا زمان جبران خسارت، مجوز عبور از تنگه هرمز و خلیج فارس را دریافت ن

4👍4🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 08:04 UTC816 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🔹به گزارش رویترز، سپاه به کشورهای خلیج فارس هشدار داده است که هرگونه حمله جدید ایالات متحده به ایران منجر به تلافی ایران و هدف قرار دادن زیرساخت‌های حیاتی انرژی در سراسر منطقه خواهد شد. 🔹 بر اساس گزارش واشنگتن پست، دونالد ترامپ، رئیس جمهور آمریکا، هفته گذشته در کمپ دیوید با پیتر هگست، وزیر جنگ، درباره کمبود شدید مهمات در ایالات متحده به شدت صحبت کرد و از او خواست توضیح دهد که چرا به نظر می‌رسد او در مورد این کمبوده

👍72

5 Aug 2026, 16:04 UTC819 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

فیوچرز طلا 4300، 4%+ رشد سنگین. 👇👇 برو بریم

👍11

5 Aug 2026, 16:04 UTC774 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

بازار سهام امریکا تمام افزایش روزانه خود را از دست داد.

👍3

5 Aug 2026, 12:23 UTC657 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

در حالی که قیمت #تتر در محدوده 189 تا 190 در نوسان است صندوق های #طلا با تتر 180 تا 183 معامله میشوند حباب منفی شدید شکل گرفته است و رشد قیمت جهانی بطور کامل نادیده گرفته شده است

👍6

5 Aug 2026, 12:22 UTC631 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

حباب آبشده به منفی 3.1 درصد رسیده است! و با تتر 183 معامله میشود

👍5

5 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTC634 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

14 مرداد 1405 #تترگلد #طلا #جهانی صرفاً جهت اطلاع آماده سیگنال صعودی هستیم ...

3👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @economyworld. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 167,219 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

محمد حسین ادیب
@adibmh · 69,420
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“عالم اقتصاد” (@economyworld), 4,476 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/economyworld.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.