Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Герасим Морозов

Channel

Герасим Морозов

@economnews1

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

523subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001622403397
TypeChannel
Username@economnews1
Created16 July 2023measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/economnews1

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5235295267 August 2026 — 529 subscribers8 August 2026 — 529 subscribers15 August 2026 — 527 subscribers23 August 2026 — 525 subscribers8 September 2026 — 524 subscribers14 September 2026 — 523 subscribers7 August 202614 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 38 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 522–530 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 16:59523-1
8 Sept 2026, 02:39524-1
23 Aug 2026, 14:12525-2
15 Aug 2026, 18:13527-2
8 Aug 2026, 04:00529no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:49529first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 16 July 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

11 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍654.5%
327.3%
🤔218.2%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2023 to 18 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Jan 2026, 00:13 UTC175 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Концепция "Русского мира" не так плоха, если не считать того, что она учитывает только надстройку (духовное), но вообще никак не учитывает базис. Так-то по логике нельзя ничего надстроить без базиса (ну вы ку-ку строить дом без фундамента?). Коммунизм и был тем хорош, что базис (материальное, ну или экономика) в нашу страну принёс, которого откровенно у нас не было, своего во всяком случае. Потом просела надстройка

👍1

18 Jan 2026, 00:04 UTC179 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Вы когда-нибудь задумывались, насколько дофамин стал дешёвым? По факту, он стал бесконечным, даже для людей с небольшим благосостоянием. Список вещей, которые нас окружают и дают лёгкий и постоянный дофамин: 1) Социальные сети (смартфон есть у всех) 2) Яркая картинка с экрана (телек, тот-же смартфон, рекламные анимированные баннеры) 3) Музыка (именно что почти любая, которая сегодня в доступе у всех) 4) Игры (любые:

2

15 Jan 2026, 20:25 UTC239 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Посмотрел сегодня сериал "Фарца" с Петровым в главной роли. Он, как понятно из названия, про фарцовщиков. После почитал комментарии под сериями. Очень удивился от того, что оказывается, заведомо известное нарушение закона, делает из человека мученика.

👍4

15 Jan 2026, 20:22 UTC262 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Наверное одна из самых больших проблем сегодняшнего общества - не понимание, что такое "добро" и как оно делается. "Воровские понятия" в девяностые сказали нам о том, что воровать у "бедного" можно, а воровать у "богатого" нельзя. Нет, дорогие друзья, воровать нельзя ни у кого, даже у самого богатого человека на планете. Если бы мы жили в системе, где можно воровать у богатых, то в один момент самые удалые грабители

🤔21👍1

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @economnews1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Герасим Морозов” (@economnews1), 523 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/economnews1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.