Channel
@eclipticof
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
11subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003441571754 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @eclipticof |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 30 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 5 times, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/eclipticof |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Aug 2026, 10:22 | 11 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:01 | 10 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 10 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 30 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
12 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6 | 50.0% | |
| 💘 | 4 | 33.3% | |
| 🎄 | 2 | 16.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 30 March 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @eclipticof. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 March 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Всем привет, пишет директор) У нас хорошие новости. Во первых, как вы могли заметить, мы нашли рору и чикиту. Во вторых нам осталось дождаться когда они запишут, и тогда у нас будет камбек!
❤1
ЧИКИТА НАШЛАСЬ!
РОРА НАШЛАСЬ!
От нас убежали две участницы Чикита и Рора помогите нам найти!? Писать: @brxgrl_oi Анкета: 1. Псевдоним 2. Возраст (желательно 12-13+) 3. Навыки
❤2
˙∘𓆩 𝐏𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐞 𓆪∘˙ 𝐎𝐫𝐢𝐠𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐥 ࿐ 𝐊/𝐃𝐀 𝐒𝐨𝐧𝐠 ࿐ 𝐏𝐨𝐩𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐫 𝐏𝐞𝐫𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐞𝐫 ࿐ 𝐑𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐣𝐢 ━━✧━━✧━━✧━━✧━━ [@eclipticof] #practice #ecliptic
❤2💘2
вышло видео на акке компании! https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTAXLJFDk/
кого в ecliptic биасят больше всего? (для видео)
The shares total 301%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
привет всем, как вы думаете какой будет камбек?)))
Всем привет! Извините, но я беру рест на две недели из-за проблем со здоровьем — меня кладут в больницу. Надеюсь на ваше понимание❤️🪽
сап всем, хотите чтобы мы здесь учавствовали?
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟➖🌟🌟🌟🌟 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ Совсем скоро нам 500 дней, поэтому мы устраиваем шоу-батл ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ Как он будет проходить: Будут выложены каверы от разных групп и артистов. Голосованием будем решать кто остается в раунде. Чтобы все было честно, артисты и группы будут отдельно. Получается суммировано мы разыграем 100к рдно ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ Награда: 50K РДНО и 5000 ФУКСИ ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ анкета в комментариях, подавать - @familyaudit
Мы в крашлисте!
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @eclipticof. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
кого в ecliptic биасят больше всего? (для видео)
The shares total 301%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 30 March 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@eclipticof named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐄𝐂𝐋𝐈𝐏𝐓𝐈𝐂 OI” (@eclipticof), 11 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eclipticof.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.