Channel
@eclipsetwotime
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
17subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003666926310 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @eclipsetwotime |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/eclipsetwotime |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:23 | 17 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:32 | 16 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (26 July 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 383 |
| Reactions total | 9 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 19:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
9 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 6 | 66.7% | |
| 💘 | 2 | 22.2% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 11.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
☀ ❌❌🤩ew post🦷 комната зацвела запахом гари и дыма. Листок запылал красным пламенем, а текст пропадал, облачаясь в уголь. Дорогой Спавн, благодарю Тебя за этот новый день. Я вверяю Тебе свои планы, свои мысли и свое сердце. Прошу, веди меня, направляй мои слова и помоги мне быть добрым и сосредоточенным. Дай мне сил справиться с тем, что ждет впереди, и радости, которой можно поделиться с другими. Я верю, что Ты бу…
☀ ❌❌🤩ew post🦷 TW: mention of blood Конечно..Сейчас. Когда Ту Тайм переваривал лист, то порезался о край бумаги. Но сам только добавил крови на рисунок и продолжил писать молитву теперь это надо сжечь? Вы раньше не проводили такой практики..
☀ ❌❌🤩ew post🦷 конечно.. буду писать.. культист, уже сидящий на полу скрестив ноги, писал на листке маленьким почерком. пиши..пиши..
☀ ❌❌🤩ew post🦷 в дом зашла тощая фигура культиста, лицо которой расплылось в нервной улыбке. Простите наставник, просто слова неверующих сильно дурманят мою голову. От этого страшно.
☀ ❌❌🤩ew post🦷 Я переживаю, стою перед домом наставника..А вдруг ритуал не поможет? Может мысль с клинком была лучше. Мне нельзя так думать, Спавн даёт мне испытания и после ритуала мне станет легче. Спавн очистит мои мысли и всё будет как прежде..ну, почти.
☀ ❌❌🤩ew post🦷 Я грешны. Я ужасно грешны. Как я могу молиться Спавну, если в моей голове мелькают мысли подобные неверующим? Эти мысли скоро заполнят не только мою голову. Но и душу. Надо быстрее от этого избавиться.🪻
☀ ❌❌🤩ew post🦷 после сегодняшней ситуации, я боюсь, что в мою душу проникнут сомнения. Надо больше молиться..
☀ ❌❌🤩ew post🦷 🤩еликий Спавн, Взывая к тебе, я прошу о защите в объятиях твоих. Молю о спасении я чудотворном. Пусть разум мой останется чист, И во славу тебе отдам я деяния свои. ❌❌❌🤩ве Спавн
Sticker, posted without a caption
🔥1
☀ ❌❌🤩ew post🦷 Из моих наблюдений, здесь слишком много непросветленных людей с затуманенным разумом..Они грубы и запутаны в своём мировоззрении.. Видимо, мне стоит отстранится от них больше, чем я думали. Или надо доказать им, что они были не правы. Хотя, Спавн сам себя проявит, не так ли?
💘1🔥1
☀ ❌❌🤩ew post🦷 ☺️ень позади, мои силы исчерпаны. Молю я об отдыхе реконструирующем. Пусть мой разум отыщет покой и пусть моё сердце надеждой зальёт. ❌❌❌❌☺️ве Спавн.
☀ ❌❌🤩ew post🦷 простите, но по вам не очень заметно. Если вы хотите уйти из существования, то лучше делать это там, где вообще никто вас не найдет. А еще я бы нарядились получше..простите
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @eclipsetwotime. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 982,140 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝘛𝘸𝘰 𝘛𝘪𝘮𝘦—𝘖𝘯𝘦 𝘭𝘪𝘧𝘦 𝘰𝘧𝘧𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘥, 𝘢 𝘴𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘥 𝘨𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘥” (@eclipsetwotime), 17 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eclipsetwotime.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.