2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 279–281 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
29 Aug 2026, 19:00
280
no change
29 Aug 2026, 18:45
280
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 8 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
99.3%
avg views ÷ 280 subscribers
Avg views / post
278
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.90%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held
20 (8 March 2026 – 29 August 2026)
Views total
1,112
Reactions total
99
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Aug 2026, 19:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
24
Links
12
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
659 reactions across 20 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👎
252
38.2%
❤
176
26.7%
🔥
94
14.3%
❤🔥
47
7.13%
👍
30
4.55%
🤯
13
1.97%
💋
10
1.52%
👾
9
1.37%
💯
7
1.06%
💊
6
0.91%
💘
5
0.759%
😍
5
0.759%
👀
4
0.607%
😱
1
0.152%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 659 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 March 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
55
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 20 we hold a reading for · 40%
Most on one post
45
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @eclipse_roleplay. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 March 2026 to 29 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤
〰️🔤🔤🔤〰️
🔤🔤🔤🔤
〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️
Гарпии - свободолюбивые, резвые и непостоянные. Они взмывают в воздух столь легко.
〰️ Внешность гарпий очень разнообразна. В основном зависит от птичьей родословной и иногда региона обитания. Могут принадлежать любому “фенотипу”. Анатомия огромна по разбросу. Одни гарпии могут выглядеть как люди с небольшим кол-вом перьев и большими крыль…
〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤
〰️🔤🔤🔤〰️
🔤🔤🔤🔤
〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️
Фенриры - Полу-люди полу-волки. Прямолинейны, быстры и отчасти диковаты.
〰️ Представители расы фенриров зачастую отличаются высоким ростом и разнообразным телосложением с превалирующей мышечной массой. Более густой волосяной покров как на голове, так и на всем остальном теле в зависимости от места проживания. Цвет кожи варьируется между н…
〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤
〰️🔤🔤🔤〰️
🔤🔤🔤🔤
〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️
Каминеко - Самодостаточная и загадочная раса кошколюдей.
〰️ Каминеко имеют отличительные черты: кошачьи уши и хвост, обычно в стандартном количестве, однако могут встречаться и «аномалии» (две пары ушей, более одного хвоста). Иногда вместо конечностей - лапы (крайне редкие случаи). Растительность на теле у этой расы по сравнению с людьми …
✨〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️
〰️🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤〰️
✨〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️
〰️ Приветствуем, Искатели Богов.
〰️ Один из игроков сделал просто чудеснейший аниматик по недавнему ивенту. Очень советую всем взглянуть на это чудо!
〰️ https://youtu.be/P6ykzv1jJyM?si=bhVv0lvHXf4OkPFg
〰️Автор: saraismissing
〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤
〰️🔤🔤🔤〰️
🔤🔤🔤🔤
〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️
Человек – одна из первых существующих рас в мире, что населяет все континенты и королевства. Создания Сины. Лишены защитных механизмов данных природой, однако компенсируют это умением приспосабливаться к быстро изменяющейся среде Парящих Островов.
〰️ Цвета кожи варьируются от молочно-белого до угольно-черного в зависимости от места проис…
✖️ 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️
✖️〰️🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤〰️
✖️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️
〰️Автор: GloomVerso
〰️ Мы не знаем, почему у нас развелось так много тюленей, но согласитесь что они имеют определённый шарм.
✖️ 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️
✖️〰️🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤〰️
✖️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️
〰️Добрый вечер, Искатели Богов!
〰️ Мы открыли Boosty для поддержки разработки проекта. Сейчас там нет особых бенефитов кроме особой роли и пары-тройки постов в неделю о инсайдах разработки, но ваша поддержка очень сильно поможет удержать нас на плаву.
Поддержка проекта исключительно добровольная. Пожалуйста, тратьте ответственно.
https://boosty.to/eclipserolepl
✖️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️
✖️〰️🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤〰️
✖️🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤
✖️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️
〰️Добрый вечер, Искатели Богов!
〰️ В Элизиуме на текущий момент обитает 12 Богов, одним из которых является Иддрос, Бог Увядания.
Когда спустившийся с небес раскроет свои прекраснейшие крылья, то чудом станет он для всех. Но свет, секундно ослепивший, откроет вид на ужас и его разрушающий успех.
〰️ На проекте, Иддроса отыгрывает vremirey.
Аудиофайл …
✖️ 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️
✖️〰️🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤〰️
✖️🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤
✖️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️
〰️Добрый вечер, Искатели Богов!
〰️ В Элизиуме на текущий момент обитает 12 Богов, одной из которых является Ллад-Йеот, Богиня Энтропии.
Для всех существ извечно была концом ужасным смерть миров, но для нее энтропия стала формой творения и переписью основ.
〰️ На проекте, Ллад-Йеот отыгрывает LinnonAndante.
Аудиофайл в комментариях.
〰️ Автор: @Hhao
✖️ ✖️ 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️
✖️ ✖️〰️🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤
✖️ ✖️✖️🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤〰️
✖️✖️ 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️
〰️ Приветствуем, Искатели Богов!
〰️ С недавними перестановками в стаффе, новой системе проверок заявок и событиями на самом сервере мы опасаемся что некоторые заявки могли затеряться в общем потоке, не получив своих ответов. Если такое случилось с вами, т.е. на вашу заявку нет ответа несколько дней — пожалуйста, напишите об этом в ко…
✖️ ✖️ 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️
✖️ ✖️〰️🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤
✖️ ✖️✖️🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤〰️
✖️✖️ 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️
〰️ Приветствуем, Искатели Богов.
〰️ Число участников проекта, включая команду, достигло ста человек, что является очень приятным показателем! Разумеется, мы не допустим того, чтобы качество проекта уступало количеству, в связи с чем мы хотим поведать вам о двух важных вещах относительно политики проекта и набора участников.
〰️ Во-пер…
❤🔥21❤5🔥5👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @eclipse_roleplay. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 701,227 of 1,630,085 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@eclipse_roleplay named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@softfate named in 1 post, 30 August 2026 – 30 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Eclipse ⟢ Milestone Team” (@eclipse_roleplay), 280 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eclipse_roleplay.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.