Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Говорим по-русски! С О.Северской и Ko

@echoporusski

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,343subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001744959340
TypeChannel
Username@echoporusski
DescriptionСообщество тех, кто любит поговорить по-русски о важном, интересном, удивительном, о "больном". И тех, кто слушал "Говорим по-русски!" в радиоэфире
Created7 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/echoporusski

Growth

3,3437 Aug 2026, 14:54 — 3,343 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 15:01 — 3,343 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 14:547 Aug 2026, 15:01
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,340–3,346 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 15:013,343no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:543,343first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.8%
avg views ÷ 3,343 subscribers
Avg views / post
394
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.31%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held18 (20 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total7,094
Reactions total219
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,280
Videos
57
Links
1,170

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

219 reactions across 17 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍9141.6%
8237.4%
😁198.68%
🔥167.31%
👏83.65%
😢20.913%
💯10.457%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 219reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 11:08 UTC232 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#ИзФрендЛенты #ПолезноЗнать Ольга Лукинова - о невербалике на экране, очень полезный эфир!

👍2

5 Aug 2026, 11:08 UTC228 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @digitaletiquettePhoto

Невербалика в онлайне. Как управлять впечатлением о себе через экран? Мы привыкли думать, что невербальная коммуникация — это жесты, мимика, взгляд, поза, интонация. Но сегодня значительная часть общения происходит через экран: в зуме, мессенджерах, электронной почте и социальных сетях. Можно ли говорить о невербалике там, где мы не видим друг друга? И если да, то из чего она теперь складывается? В новом выпуске по

👍7👏1

3 Aug 2026, 18:22 UTC289 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#Улыбнитесь #ИзФрендЛенты

😁115👍3😢2

2 Aug 2026, 08:16 UTC361 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#НашеВидео 📺 Сегодня поговорим о гимнографии: о том, как почитают тех, кто не канонизирован Церковью. 📍Священник Максим Плякин рассказывает о трех типах "паралитургики" - молитвенных текстах, прославляющих "хороших людей", тех священослужителей и праведников, которые стоят на пороге канонизации, и "параллельных" образах святых. ◻️ Посмотрев видео, вы узнаете, как быть с благочестивым Иваном Грозным, Сергеем Есенины

👍4

31 Jul 2026, 06:22 UTC403 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#ИзЖизниСлов #Сленг #КакПравильно С открытием блогосферы и социальных сетей в русский язык, точнее - в русскую речь! - пришло слово КОНСЕРВА: блогеры варят, например, рыбные супы из КОНСЕРВЫ, а народ делится опытом выживания без готовки - взял на ужин какую-нибудь КОНСЕРВУ - и порядок! 🔺 Не знаю, как вас, а меня КОНСЕРВА веселит. Но для ее приверженцев у меня плохая новость - специалисты справки Грамоты утверждают:

👍18

27 Jul 2026, 06:40 UTC481 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

А в Воронежской области есть такая станция! Представляете, чем занимались ее прежние жители?🤓🤭

👍8😁5💯1🔥1

27 Jul 2026, 06:32 UTC434 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#ИзЖизниСлов 📒 Сегодня заглянем в историю двух колоритных слов — «брязги» и «дрязги». Они звучат почти как звукоподражание, и в этом есть своя логика: в народной речи такие слова часто передают не только смысл, но и интонацию — в данном случае легкое раздражение, досаду, пренебрежение. 📍Слово «брязги» (в значении «вздор, пустые речи, сплетни») фиксировалось ещё в авторитетных словарях XVIII–XIX веков: в «Словаре Ака

👍102

26 Jul 2026, 11:34 UTC363 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Владимир Пахомов напомнил: сегодня 75-летний юбилей обнаружения берестяной грамоты! Безусловно, нужно отпраздновать!

8🔥2👍1

26 Jul 2026, 11:34 UTC362 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @kurkUma_forever

26 июля — День берестяной грамоты. 75 лет назад, 26 июля 1951 года, в Великом Новгороде была обнаружена первая берестяная грамота. Очень люблю эту лекцию великого лингвиста Андрея Анатольевича Зализняка о берестяных грамотах: https://elementy.ru/nauchno-populyarnaya_biblioteka/432804/Iz_rasskazov_o_berestyanykh_gramotakh

13🔥5👍1

26 Jul 2026, 08:10 UTC382 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#НашеВидео📺 Насколько важно грамотно организованное повторение лексики для успешного освоения русского языка как иностранного? Можно ли объективно оценить эффективность современных учебников? И какую роль будет играть преподаватель в эпоху стремительного развития искусственного интеллекта? 📍Об этом мы поговорили с Полиной Дорожкиной, лаборантом-исследователем Лаборатории когнитивных и лингвистических исследований Ин

5👍3

25 Jul 2026, 08:27 UTC327 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#ИзЖизниСлов Когда я попала в Александринку, одним из ярких, наряду со спектаклем, впечатлений была встреча с капельдинерами - в ливреях, по "театральному статуту"! 📍Что входило в костюм: ◻️Ливрейный фрак. Часто чёрного или тёмно-синего цвета. Иногда с галунами. Ливрейные пуговицы были крупными (золотыми или серебряными) с гербом, короной или монограммой. Иногда добавляли витой погон и аксельбант (на левом плече —

12🔥3👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @echoporusski. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Говорим по-русски! С О.Северской и Ko” (@echoporusski), 3,343 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/echoporusski.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.