Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ECG daily

@ecg_cases1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

717subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002436719853
TypeChannel
Username@ecg_cases1
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ecg_cases1

Growth

7176 Aug 2026, 23:02 — 717 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 05:01 — 717 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 23:027 Aug 2026, 05:01
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 716–718 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 05:01717no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:02717first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

173 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5431.2%
👎4123.7%
👍4023.1%
💔2112.1%
🔥137.51%
😍31.73%
😐10.578%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 173reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 August 2025 to 18 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Oct 2025, 07:19 UTC≈1,360 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @INTERNALMEDICINEBOARD

سلام. سفت بشینین بچه ها که یه سورپریز فوق محشر داریم! به لطف یکی از اساتيد بزرگوار که گفتن نامشون رو نبریم کلیه اطلسها، پادکستها و کیس های هاریسون جدید تقدیمتون میشه فقط میمونه ۱۴۳۵ تا نمونه سوال که متاسفانه هر کاری کردم نشد جورش کنم. شماها هم که کلا همتون خسته این و هیچکس هیچ کمکی نکرد در هر حال: بخورید و بیاشامید و اسراف کنید. برای حضرت استاد و من روسیاه هم دعا کنید فقط چون کانال ممکنه به خاطر کپی رایت تعطیل

😍3😐1

Signed erfan bahmani

7 Oct 2025, 05:22 UTC≈1,480 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

مدتی است می فهمم که روایت اصلی پشت سر فناوری هسته ای ایران یک همه چیزی است. می فهمم که انرژی مهمتر است از بمب. آب سنگین یک ابزار گریز به سمت بمب نیست، بلکه راهی به سوی رهایی صنعتی و فناوری هایی است که دقیقا نمی دانم چیست اما می دانم که مربوط به آینده مبهمی است که آمریکا سعی می کند بدون معرفی کردن دقیق آن، اما آن را تصاحب کند! اما چرا هیچ کسی بلد نیست این روایت معمایی، جنایی، پلیسی و حتی حماسی و دراماتیک را بصورت یک

👍5👎4

Signed erfan bahmani

27 Sept 2025, 16:53 UTC≈1,550 views33 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @namahramatVideo

یه چیز باحال نشونتون بدم ظریف از اینکه بهش اجازه ندادن بجز هسته ای در مسائل دیگه وارد مذاکره بشه ناراحت بوده و یکی دو ماه پیش با وجود نزدیک بودن مکانیسم ماشه ابراز ناراحتی کرده فرض کنید ما در زمینه موشکی به ظریف اجازه مذاکره می دادیم الان داشتیم مثل قلاب سنگ داران عرب توی جنگ های صلیبی با اسرائیل می جنگیدیم یا حتی گردان پلخمون داران خراسان رو باید به مرز های لبنان اعزام می کردیم

👍18👎15

Signed erfan bahmani

4 Sept 2025, 15:46 UTC≈1,650 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

📌 اندر احوال این روزهای کشور و بحث #کنسرت!

🔥10👎8💔3👍2

Signed erfan bahmani

26 Aug 2025, 05:57 UTC≈1,280 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @schoolofmedicine_irVideo

این چند ثانیه برای درک این‌که هر لید نوار قلب روی کدوم قسمت از قلب تمرکز داره، کمک‌کننده هست. منبع:‌ Cardiovascular Corner #ECG

10

Signed erfan bahmani

24 Aug 2025, 17:56 UTC≈1,490 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File

قسمت دوم پاسخ

2

Signed erfan bahmani

24 Aug 2025, 17:52 UTC≈1,410 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Voice message

قسمت اول پاسخ

3🔥1

Signed erfan bahmani

24 Aug 2025, 09:35 UTC≈1,490 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🥀روز شهادت امام رضا رو تسلیت میگم به نظرم در این روز، جا داره نگاهی بندازیم رویکرد امام رضا به عدالت اجتماعی و نحوه برقراری عدالت در جامعه؛ واقعا چقدر نگاه ائمه به عدالت و حق محرومین و فقرا در جامعه ما غریب هست و حتی روحانیون ما هم از اون حرف نمیزنن. متاسفانه اون جنبه هایی از دین داره در پشت اکثر تریبون‌ها بازگو میشه که اصلا نقش کلیدی در حوزه عدالت اجتماعی ندارن. سالهاست به حرم امام رضا میریم. یکبار خود من نشده که

18👎3

Signed erfan bahmani

24 Aug 2025, 09:25 UTC≈1,090 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File

🔉#بشنوید 🔰سخنرانی استاد حسن رحیم‌پور ازغدی با موضوع: حق فقیران در جیب سرمایه‌داران (امام رضا ع: هیچ‌کس مالک مطلق هیچ چیز نیست) دانشگاه امام رضا ع - میلاد حضرت رضا ع - مشهد - ۱۴۰۰ 📅 پخش: ۱۴۰۴/۰۲/۱۹ 🆔 @rahimpour

14👍2👎2

Signed erfan bahmani

23 Aug 2025, 05:17 UTC≈10,700 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Poll

بیمار خانمی ۶۵ ساله است که با central chest pain از یکساعت مراجعه نموده است. همچنین بیمار از تنگی نفس فعالیتی و بی حالی از ۳ روز قبل نیز شکایت دارد. BP 79/51, HR 105 reg, SpO2 93 RA

  1. Ant STEMI14%
  2. WPW13%
  3. diffuse ischemia26%
  4. RV MI25%
  5. inferior NSTEMI22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1

Signed erfan bahmani

23 Aug 2025, 05:09 UTC≈1,150 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed erfan bahmani

22 Aug 2025, 10:09 UTC≈1,280 viewsread 6 August 2026

اپروچ به موج P منفی در لید ۱: یکی از احتمالات اینه که محل شروع ایمپالس از دهلیز چپ باشد و از لید یک دور شود که در نهایت منفی ثبت میشود. دو تشخیص دیگر داریم که جالب است بدانید که در این دو تشخیص بعدی ریتم ما سینوس است: دکستروکاردی و برعکس بستن لید های اندامی دست چپ و راست‌‌. افتراق این دو مورد از هم: باید R progression را در لید های پره‌کوردیال بررسی کنیم. اگر مانند حالت نرمال بود: باید بدانیم که دکستروکاردی نداریم و

Signed erfan bahmani

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ecg_cases1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Aug 2025, 05:17 UTCAnonymous Quiz600 voters

بیمار خانمی ۶۵ ساله است که با central chest pain از یکساعت مراجعه نموده است. همچنین بیمار از تنگی نفس فعالیتی و بی حالی از ۳ روز قبل نیز شکایت دارد. BP 79/51, HR 105 reg, SpO2 93 RA

  1. Ant STEMI14%
  2. WPW13%
  3. diffuse ischemia26%
  4. RV MI25%
  5. inferior NSTEMI22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Aug 2025, 14:57 UTCAnonymous Poll111 voters

بیمار خانمی ۴۷ ساله است که با شکایت درد شانه راست و تعریق از ۴ ساعت قبل مراجعه کرده است. HR 70 reg, BP 177/87, SpO2 95 نوار قلب بالا در تریاژ از مریض گرفته شده. اینترن قلب برای مریض تشخیص ((inferior ischaemia)) رو پیشنهاد میده. نظر شما چیه؟

  1. درست گفته دمش گرم♥️28%
  2. اشتباه گفته (اگر تشخیص درست تری رو توی ذهن دارین در بخش کامنت ها بگین)72%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 August 2025 to 18 October 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,281,698 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ECG daily” (@ecg_cases1), 717 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ecg_cases1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.