Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for промты ебучи на хтмл

Channel

промты ебучи на хтмл

@ebuchiihtml

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

357subscribers

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003500960657
TypeChannel
Username@ebuchiihtml
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 30 April 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held1
On Telegramt.me/ebuchiihtml

Growth

Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 22:31357first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 2 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
71.5%
avg views ÷ 357 subscribers
Avg views / post
255
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.51%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026
Posts held11 (2 July 202622 July 2026)
Views total1,786
Reactions total27
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 22:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
228
Links
7

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

38 reactions across 9 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🍓2976.3%
💊923.7%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Jul 2026, 07:45 UTC299 views4 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

A masterfully executed digital painting with a soft, warm pastel color palette, simulating traditional textured media like soft pastels or gouache. The entire piece is characterized by the absence of hard black outlines; forms are defined solely by soft-edged, blended color blocking and textured brushwork. Anatomy is stylized and delicate: refined facial features, a slender neck, and idealized, slightly youthful prop

🍓3💊1

Signed ⋆. ⟢ xxrebett |-/ 𝜗𝜚 ‧₊˚ ⊹

22 Jul 2026, 06:50 UTC285 views4 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Highly stylized digital illustration with a soft, warm pastel color palette. Combines visible watercolor wash textures with overlaid colored pencil sketch lines. No hard black outlines; forms are defined by soft-edged color blocking and textured lines. Anatomy is semi-realistic, with large expressive eyes featuring minimal complex iris details, soft blush patches, and a rounded face shape. Skin is rendered with soft,

🍓2💊2

Signed ⋆. ⟢ xxrebett |-/ 𝜗𝜚 ‧₊˚ ⊹

22 Jul 2026, 06:41 UTC252 views4 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

A master-level digital concept art portrait, bridging the gap between a refined painting and a spontaneous sketch. The core technique relies on visible, deliberate brushwork and painterly texture applied over a fluid, dynamic line-art foundation. Anatomy is stylized and idealized, with sharp, defined jawline and slender neck anatomy. The rendering of the face features luminous glass skin texture achieved through soph

🍓3💊1

Signed ⋆. ⟢ xxrebett |-/ 𝜗𝜚 ‧₊˚ ⊹

22 Jul 2026, 06:16 UTC238 views3 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Stylized digital illustration mimicking a raw, master-level character concept sketch. Executed with intentionally dirty and sketchy line art, where multiple overlapping strokes create a single form. The line weight is chaotic and spontaneous, with deliberate overshoots at the corners. Facial anatomy is hyper-stylized: massive eyes with large pupils and messy lashes, paired with a very small, subtly rendered chin and

🍓2💊1

Signed ⋆. ⟢ xxrebett |-/ 𝜗𝜚 ‧₊˚ ⊹

22 Jul 2026, 06:03 UTC240 views5 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Highly stylized digital art portrait, specific doll-faced aesthetic with disproportionately large eyes and small defined lips, heavy graphic line work focusing on extreme long individual eyelashes, distinct puffy undereye anatomy creating bags under eyes, deep irises with a tiny specific colored reflective dot (like red) within the dark pupil, flawless airbrushed digital painting skin texture with soft blush patches,

🍓3💊2

Signed ⋆. ⟢ xxrebett |-/ 𝜗𝜚 ‧₊˚ ⊹

22 Jul 2026, 05:45 UTC268 views5 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Soft digital illustration with visible pastel and watercolor texture, painterly brushwork with soft edges, no hard black outlines, dreamy atmosphere, grain texture overlay, muted pastel color palette, warm skin tones, expressive eyes with painted irises, delicate rendering of lace, sketchy elements in background, storybook illustration style нб лайт

🍓4💊1

Signed ⋆. ⟢ xxrebett |-/ 𝜗𝜚 ‧₊˚ ⊹

18 Jul 2026, 17:41 UTC204 views2 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @venupromptsPhoto

⭐️ Вену на связи! Мы с подружками решили собрать в одном месте то, что сами постоянно создаем, тестируем и то, чем активно пользуемся - промпты для генерации ИИ-картинок. Поэтому... добро пожаловать в ⭐️ RE:pic | пропмты ⭐️ Если у тебя уже есть отдельный чатик, где ты сохраняешь все самое красивое, поздравляю! Будет еще один! 😉 Пробежимся кратко что тебя ждет: ⭐️ Полезная информация для генераций (что, как, зачем

🍓1💊1

Signed ⋆. ⟢ xxrebett |-/ 𝜗𝜚 ‧₊˚ ⊹

15 Jul 2026, 16:20 UTC323 views8 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Ethereal gouache and watercolor illustration, textured paper canvas, loose paint splatters and washes, wet-on-wet watercolor technique, soft dreamy color palette, artistic fluid brushstrokes, high-end webtoon cover art style, delicate and poetic visual aesthetic

🍓8

Signed ⋆. ⟢ xxrebett |-/ 𝜗𝜚 ‧₊˚ ⊹

2 Jul 2026, 08:25 UTC466 views3 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Masterpiece, 8k, best quality, tight semi-realistic digital painting with photobash elements, highly detailed rendering with smooth gradients and sharp focal points, natural realistic color palette with warm and cool temperature balance, subtle visible brushwork on secondary elements with tight rendering on faces and hands, cinematic natural lighting, realistic skin texture with pores and subtle imperfections, enviro

🍓3

Signed ⋆. ⟢ xxrebett |-/ 𝜗𝜚 ‧₊˚ ⊹

2 Jul 2026, 07:40 UTC366 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

есть флер гптэшки но мне нравится......

Signed ⋆. ⟢ xxrebett |-/ 𝜗𝜚 ‧₊˚ ⊹

2 Jul 2026, 07:37 UTC325 viewsread 14 August 2026

чекаю банану лайт, пока мне оч нравится, несмотря на все приколямбы с ошибками на пикчах

Signed ⋆. ⟢ xxrebett |-/ 𝜗𝜚 ‧₊˚ ⊹

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @ebuchiihtml. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 946,509 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“промты ебучи на хтмл” (@ebuchiihtml), 357 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ebuchiihtml.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.