Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ابتکار ایران🇮🇷؛ جانمایی جدید

@ebtekareiran

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,511subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001625102270
TypeChannel
Username@ebtekareiran
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ebtekareiran

Growth

1,5101,5131,511.56 August 2026 — 1,511 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,511 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,513 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,510 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,511 subscribers1,5116 August 202615 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 9 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,510–1,513 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 02:081,511+1
11 Aug 2026, 23:541,510-3
9 Aug 2026, 09:111,513+2
6 Aug 2026, 07:351,511no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:021,511first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.7%
avg views ÷ 1,511 subscribers
Avg views / post
313
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.882%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (10 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total2,504
Reactions total17
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 18:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

46 reactions across 16 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3780.4%
715.2%
👎12.17%
🔥12.17%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 46reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 14:49 UTC130 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔴🔴 نشریه تخصصی IMF در مورد «جهانی زدایی» و «چندتکه شدن اقتصاد جهان» و «برآمدن مجدد مفهوم ژئواکونومی» نوشته است: محورهای نشریه: - درک مفهوم ژئواکونومیک در جهانی پرنوسان - بازخوانی مفهوم ژئواکونومیک - هزینهِ تحکم ژئواکونومیک - همکاری تجاری در عصر ژئوپلیتیک - موج جدید ملی‌سازی - اصلاح خطاهای جهانی‌شدن - کینز برای زمانه ما؛ به قلم رابرت اسکیدلسکی - جهان چقدر کار می‌کند؟ - بازخوانی مفهوم «ثروت ملل» - بازگشت به اصول: مواد

👍2

27 Jul 2026, 21:27 UTC355 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

شماره دوم خبرنامه پاکستان شامل اخبار روابط پاکستان با قدرتها و کشورهای منطقه و اخبار اقتصاد و امنیتی پاکستان با ما همراه باشید... @EBTEKAREIRAN

👍1

27 Jul 2026, 21:26 UTC307 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔴 آموس هوشتاین مذاکره کننده ارشد سابق دولت بایدن و مشاور سابق بایدن نوشت: در حالی که ترامپ میان تشدید تنش یا رسیدن به یک توافق در حال تصمیم‌گیری است، با یک واقعیت سخت روبه‌رو شده است: جبهه‌های روسیه و ایران در حال هم‌پوشانی و تقویت یکدیگر هستند و ابزارهای مهار شوک بعدی در بازار انرژی، هفته‌به‌هفته در حال از بین رفتن‌اند. ۱/ زمانی که تفاهم‌نامه هرمز (Hormuz MOU) اعلام شد، کاهش نگرانی‌ها تنها در بازار نفت خام منعکس ش

👍3

21 Jul 2026, 11:58 UTC378 viewsread 7 August 2026
File

خبرنامه پاکستان شماره نخست با توجه به اهمیت روزافزون مسئله پاکستان برای کشور ما تیم جانمایی جدید مدتهاست که بر روی این حوزه متمرکز شده است، در این راستا در نظر داریم تا به صورت منظم خبرنامه پاکستان را منتشر کرده و خط اخبار را در این کشور با نگاهی مسئله محور پیگیری کنیم. با ما همراه باشید @EBTEKAREIRAN

21 Jul 2026, 11:55 UTC340 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔴 از سیاست های اعلامی تا سیاست های اعمالی... 🔰 مجری ( علی واعظ ) : اجازه دهید این سؤال را از شما بپرسم. یکی از موضوعاتی که برای بسیاری از مردم مبهم است این است که چرا ایران توافقی را که عموماً به‌عنوان توافقی به سود ایران توصیف می‌شد، بر سر کنترل تنگه هرمز و مسیر جنوبی آن کنار گذاشت؛ مسیری که در بهترین حالت تنها حدود ۲۰ درصد از تردد دریایی را پوشش می‌دهد. این مسئله باعث شده درباره انگیزه‌های ایران ابهام ایجاد شود.

👍2

17 Jul 2026, 14:46 UTC418 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔴🔴 حسین قتیب: حرف‌های ج دی ونس جالبند، متفاوت است، مهم است؟ هست! اما چشم‌هایتان را به پرواز سوخت‌رسان‌ها، الگوی حملات موشکی دشمن و جزایر و بنادر بدوزید. واقعیت آن جاست. @ebtekareiran

👍5

17 Jul 2026, 14:45 UTC377 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

. شیب کاهش ذخایر استراتژیک نفت آمریکا . 🔖با ما همراه باشید... #نفت #تنگه #آمریکا #جنگ 📱@suqona

👍4

15 Jul 2026, 06:49 UTC390 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

🔰 اگر فکر میکنید سناریوی طراحی شده در پست قبلی تخیلی است حتما متن پیوست را بخوانید. متن پیوست خلاصه ای از یک متن بلندبالا است که چند روز پیش در اندیشکده «شورای آتلانتیک» منتشر شده است. نویسنده در این مقاله توصیه میکند که امریکا به ظاهر به تفاهمنامه پایبند باشد (توضیح اینکه این مقاله قبل از شروع مجدد جنگ نوشته شده است) اما در عین حال چند کار انجام دهد: 1- مذاکرات را دائما لِفت دهد و دائما موعد 60 روزه را به بهانه ها

👍4

15 Jul 2026, 06:43 UTC325 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔴🔴🔴 درباره اعمال مجدد محاصره دریایی عده ای در ایران این تصور را دارند که اگر ایران در زمینه تنگه هرمز مدارا به خرج میداد و اجازه میداد کریدور عمانی (حتی به خلاف مفاد تفاهمنامه) کار کند آنگاه مسیر مذاکرات پیش میرفت، در زمینه هسته ای به توافق می رسیدیم، تنش ها کاهش پیدا میکرد، نفت ایران در قالب اسقاطیه به خوبی صادر میشد و در نهایت به نقطه «لغو تحریم ها و عادی سازی روابط» میرسیدیم. اما اگر تاریخ 15 ساله، رویدادهای یک

6👎1

15 Jul 2026, 06:41 UTC258 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔴🔴 رضا نصری، حقوقدان بین المللی به خوبی توضیح میدهد که کدام طرف مقصر است: بند پنجم یادداشت تفاهم اسلام‌آباد شامل سه تعهد است و در هر سه مورد، طرفِ متعهد یکسان است: «جمهوری اسلامی ایران ترتیبات لازم را اتخاذ خواهد کرد»؛ «عملیات مین‌روبی توسط جمهوری اسلامی ایران ظرف ۳۰ روز آغاز خواهد شد»؛ و «جمهوری اسلامی ایران با سلطنت عمان وارد گفت‌وگو خواهد شد.» در بند پنجم هیچ اشاره‌ای به ایالات متحده نشده است. این موضوع ناشی از

👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ebtekareiran. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 242,947 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ابتکار ایران🇮🇷؛ جانمایی جدید” (@ebtekareiran), 1,511 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ebtekareiran.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.