Channel
@eazyprofitt
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
172subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001201236532 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @eazyprofitt |
| Description | Взгляды, мысли, аналитика, крипта, макро Не финансовый совет |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/eazyprofitt |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:46 | 172 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:20 | 172 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:30 | 173 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 11 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
42 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 23 | 54.8% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 23.8% | |
| 🐳 | 4 | 9.52% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 7.14% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 2.38% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 2.38% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 11 January 2026 to 4 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Немного перекрываю профит, чтоб перезайти ниже. В целом чуть чуть реструктуризирую портфель. 💼 Основной фокус как и говорила ранее, на нефтянку + энерго, и как хэдж uup. AG пока держу, уж очень нравится формация на графике.
👍2
Первая лимитка сработала , след.на 71 (повторюсь, допускаю 68-69)
Свой портфель (именно среднесрочный на 2-3 квартала, фонда) я буду собирать с учетом геополитики и он будет состоять из: 40% энергосектор (нефть+уран) 20% выделяю на аграрку (тут можно etf на аграрный сектор, или отдельно каждый актив, этот вариант мне нравится более. Тут кукуруза, сахар, пшеница и пр.) Часть портфеля на дата центы/батареи и подобное , уже расписывала выше И как хэдж буду использовать UUP. Это по…
👍5
Касательно нефти , есть два варианта (так как у меня нет выхода на Брент, но есть возможность торговать другой сорт) Беру для себя dbo лесенкой вплоть до 9$ с апсайдом 3х. USO и xle (по сути солянка из американского нефтесектора) не сильно интересна чисто технически. Хотя может взять опционы по ним. Это ставка на ближайший год как база + уран. Серебро не отменяет свой ход после глобальной коррекции, так как ожида…
-По btc ожидаю захват зон 73-70 (допускать закол ниже, но именно закол без закрытия тела) -расставила лимитные ордера там, с целью 86 и 100. -считаю что на этот отскоке и будет тот самый «гавноальтсезон». Поэтому если не будет закрепа выше 105-106, то буду скидывать портфель как есть и хеджировать шортом это дело
❤2
Не, ну а говорили альта волатильная. Металлы сегодня удивили.
❤1🤣1
Начинаю лесенкой набор вплоть до 50 за Брент. Увы, на фридоме нет возможности торговать именно этот сорт, но другой подтянется следом. 🤝
👍4
Акции компаний, которые занимаются добычей урана, на этой неделе закрылись на новых исторических максимумах. Уран на максимуме за 9 месяцев @banksta
🔥1
💯
🔥4
Премаркет дает дрозда. В целом, это лоукап компаниям, да по мультипликаторам есть проблемки местами, но такие компании я держу по 1-3 штуки на каждый сектор (платина, золото, серебро, уран) Если начинается рост с такой капой, то он просто взрывной 🔥
👍4
😉
Пурумпумпум, браво комоды.👍 Это это еще далеко не цели фиксации.
👍2🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @eazyprofitt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Они снова печатают” (@eazyprofitt), 172 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eazyprofitt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.