2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 39–41 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 19:31
40
no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:59
40
first reading
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 14 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
71.9%
avg views ÷ 40 subscribers
Avg views / post
28.8
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026
Posts held
13 (14 April 2026 – 24 July 2026)
Views total
115
Reactions total
12
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Aug 2026, 19:31 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
28
Videos
6
Links
7
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
18s
Average length
18s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
33 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
12
36.4%
👍
12
36.4%
🕊
4
12.1%
🔥
3
9.09%
❤🔥
1
3.03%
💯
1
3.03%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 14 April 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
продолжение
Написала девушке-продюсеру, за блогом которой давно наблюдала. Мы познакомились лично и договорились попробовать формат наставничества.
Увиделась с крутыми аниматорами. Уважаю их не только за работы и просветительскую деятельность, но также они симпатичны как люди: открытые, позитивные, вечно ищущие. Такие герои-исследователи из книжки Жюль Верна.
Посмотрела, какую анимацию сейчас делают с помощью ИИ и…
Впечатления от Слёта аниматоров 2026
Я хожу на него уже четвёртый год подряд. В этом году сомневалась, стоит ли идти. За последнее время мой фокус не сместился, но заметно расширился. Меня всё время тянет исследовать соседние области.
Поэтому весной я пошла учиться виртуальному продакшену, собирать локации в Unreal Engine, знакомиться с новыми инструментами. В том числе использование ИИ в киношном пайпалайне.
Слёт …
Зачем тут пишу?
Пишу, чтобы научится писать. Быстро и без сомнений.
Чтобы продолжить рефлексировать и вести такой публичный дневник. Ведь непубличный не веду, а прикоснуться к прошлому бывает очень интересно.
Чтобы социализироваться. Укрепить существующие связи и обрести новые.
Ребрендинг канала в двух частях
Часть вторая. С любовью к себе и вам.
Полезно иногда смотреть на мир глазами других людей, на себя и на ситуацию со стороны.
Мне как-то предлагали пойти в критики. Я не пошла и не научилась, что у критики, есть две регулирующие стороны. И одна из них — отмечает сильные стороны, восхваляет прекрасное. Так сложилось, что почти всю жизнь, я занималась другой самокритикой.
Пришло время,…
Примирение
И снова я смотрю во тьму…
В ту черноту, что отражается в воде…
Спустя десятки лет она всё та же
И те же блики ходят по воде,
И даже я — всё та же.
Всё во мне.
Все бывшие дожди,
Вся свежесть утренней росы, туманы, океаны
Москва, Париж,
Деревня Липнишки,
Варшава
И хутор далеко тот на горе
Во мне и боль, и слёзы, и трамваи,
И старые журналы на столе
Смешно — читали мы журналы…
И танцевали, и кричали во д…
Ребрендинг канала в двух частях
Часть первая. О том что было и почему.
Всё начиналось как цитатник. Кусочки поэзии, которые вы должны услышать. Кусочки из книг, которые приглянулись мне и надо было где-то сохранить. И название было «Просто сложено» — о простоте сложного и о сложности простого.
И посему оставлю здесь своё стихотворение, которое недавно просто сложилось:
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @easyhardy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Замечательная Ника” (@easyhardy), 40 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/easyhardy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.