Channel
@e_gates
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
854subscribers
-19 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001635818420 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @e_gates |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/e_gates |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:48 | 854 | -8 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 13:27 | 862 | -5 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:46 | 867 | -6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:16 | 873 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:58 | 873 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 15 December 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 February 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1,311 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 648 | 49.4% | |
| ❤ | 508 | 38.7% | |
| 👏 | 73 | 5.57% | |
| 👍 | 44 | 3.36% | |
| 🎉 | 17 | 1.30% | |
| ⚡ | 12 | 0.915% | |
| 🤩 | 5 | 0.381% | |
| 😍 | 4 | 0.305% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,311reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 December 2023 to 9 February 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
New partner for E-Gates — Qmall 💲 We are excited to announce a collaboration with Qmall, Ukraine's leading cryptocurrency exchange 🇺🇦 🟢User base of 320K 🟢5k+ crypto ATMs 🟢Monthly trading volume of $1.8B Thanks to our PassMe system, Qmall now has a faster, more efficient, and more secure verification process for all users. But that's not all! E-Gates also streamlined transactions and management of cryptocurrencies…
🔥4❤1👍1
🔬E-Labs Explained — Transforming Your Business with Tailored Solutions Today, let's dive into E-Labs, a 🇬🇧 UK-based leader in White-Label solutions. E-Labs crafts custom solutions to manage both crypto 😁 and fiat 💵 transactions under your brand, which boosts your service offerings and market presence. The product range is quite diverse: 🟢Non-custodial and custodial wallets 🟢Vesting and staking portals 🟢Non-custod…
👍1🔥1
🤖 Generative AI tools like Stable Diffusion, MidJourney, and Dall-E have raised serious concerns within the world of user verification 🚨 🌐 This image, which can potentially bypass any KYC verification system, was posted on the r/StableDiffusion Reddit community. As GenAI tools evolve and improve, it will become easier and more accessible for people to create fake IDs 🆔 Looking ahead, developers and security expert…
👍1
❌ Top 3 Fears of Crypto Newbies & How E-Gates Helps Jumping into the crypto world is exciting but comes with its own set of worries: 1️⃣ Security Concerns The thought of losing funds to hackers or scams is a major fear. E-Gates strengthens your defenses with robust KYC solutions, keeping your investments safe. 2️⃣ Compliance Overwhelm Newbies to crypto often worry about how to remain compliant amidst complex and c…
🎉1
🔐 Reinforcing Trust in Crypto with Unmatched Security The importance of security is undeniable, but the crypto world is still the Wild West in this regard 🌵 We aim to protect our users' interests since traditional safety nets, such as bank deposit guarantees, are unavailable in the crypto world. 🗝 Our non-custodial wallet will give millions of crypto users complete control over their funds, ensuring they retain ow…
🔥3
🕵️♂️ Challenge Complete! Thanks to all who searched our posts for the secret words. You showed great detective skills! 1️⃣@spaceCadet25 2️⃣@evolatio 3️⃣@Yougen22 🎉 We'll reach out to the winners soon to coordinate their prize collection. Each one gets a share of $30! Thanks for playing, and stay tuned for more exciting challenges! 🌐Website 👍Chat 👍Twitter
🔥8
‼️ Get ready for the launch of an exciting challenge starting TODAY! 🕵️♂️🔍 In our last five posts, including this announcement, we've coded a secret word in each. 🤫 Did you catch them? They were creatively highlighted - think italics, bold, underlines, and more! 🔍Your mission: 1️⃣ Dive into our last posts. 2️⃣ Find one special word per post. 3️⃣ Write the correct five-word sentence in the comments. $30 will be s…
🔥10👍8😍2❤1
✅ PassMe 101: Superior Verification, Fraction of the Cost PassMe is an advanced, cost-effective digital verification system that streamlines the process of user identity checks using AI and neural network technology 🪙 💲 Traditional methods involving AML officers cost businesses $0.68 to $1.36 per check. Automated verification services, while offering process improvements, typically will cost a business $1.5-$3.79 p…
🎉2
In Web3, security and simplicity are key, and here's why: 💰 As crypto merges with everyday finance, safe, easy crypto access for all becomes crucial, transforming crypto from a complex novelty to a daily necessity. 📄According to the Blockworks article, overcoming these two challenges is the path to onboarding the next billion users 🌍 Indeed, secure, fast, and easy-to-use payment rails bypass many of the restrictio…
❤132⚡4🎉1👍1
E-Wallet: Your Gateway to Modern Financial Solutions 💸 E-Wallet is a non-custodial, cross-chain wallet designed for both new and experienced Web3 users. It is available in the following options: 🌐 Google Chrome extension 🤖 Android application 📱 iOS application Top 4️⃣ competitive advantages of E-Wallet: 🟢The use of JavaScript 👩💻 and React Native 👩💻 ensures speedy, adaptable performance and a reliable, efficien…
🔥19
E-Gates Joins Forces with PointPay ⭐️ 🤝 We are proud to announce our partnership with PointPay, a platform that covers all crypto needs in a single ecosystem. They present: 🟢200 countries of operation 🟢3M+ active users worldwide 🟢Up to 7% APR in staking E-Gates intends to refine PointPay’s KYC protocols to effectively accommodate an extensive array of services and products. 🌐Website 👍Chat 👍Twitter
🔥92❤22👏7🤩4👍2
Our Response to the Incident with a Cryptocurrency Exchange 🚨 Nearly 230,000 users' KYC data, such as IDs and credit cards, have been exposed due to a misconfigured storage system. ❕ This incident underscores the importance of choosing a reliable verification solutions provider. That's why, at E-Gates, we prioritize absolute data safety. Our PassMe technology offers unparalleled encryption and a decentralized arch…
❤73👏8🔥7🎉4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @e_gates. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🔍 E-Wallet Usage Quiz! 🌟 How often do you use your digital wallet? Let's find out where you stand in the fintech revolution! 🚀 Share your answer and let's see how our community engages with digital wallets!
The shares total 129%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 December 2023 to 9 February 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“E-gates.io Announcements” (@e_gates), 854 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/e_gates.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.