Did $PFE ruin the GLP-1 trade for everyone? Asking for a friend. May 23, 2023 at 05:31PM

Channel
Earnings Whispers
@eWhispers
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
520subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001430275184 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @eWhispers |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/eWhispers |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 22:37 | 520 | +2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:26 | 518 | -3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:05 | 521 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:32 | 524 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:45 | 524 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 22 May 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 May 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
6 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 5 | 83.3% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 16.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 May 2023 to 23 May 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Is it a coincidence that the most beloved group at the moment - the Staples $XLP - sold off yesterday while one of the most hated - $ARKK - rallied? https://t.co/oMi4gKp1GN #sentiment https://t.co/wzTjnKzLIA https://t.co/y1DBH4RUQY May 23, 2023 at 03:22PM
👍3
@Rstein1297 Thanks Ryan, we send this out via email each night for free https://t.co/xusFnmj79x May 23, 2023 at 02:00PM
👍2
Until shown otherwise, the path of least resistance is now defined. https://t.co/oMi4gKp1GN $SPY $DECK $NVDA $DY $WDAY $NOW $YELP $SPX https://t.co/WdOrz2aGak May 23, 2023 at 08:31AM
@Will_Young26 @ZHP94585808 like sentiment trader, we'll put this data in our newsletter tonight for you to read https://t.co/oMi4gKpzwl May 23, 2023 at 03:58AM
@Will_Young26 @ZHP94585808 We aren't trying to prove anything to anyone. Here is the code: SELECT COUNT(*) as Total, MIN(Date) as FirstDate, MAX(Date) as LastDate, SUM(CASE WHEN SPYReturn > 0 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) as Success, AVG(SPYReturn) as AvgSPY, AVG(ARKKReturn) as AvgARKK FROM ( SELECT… https://t.co/S26D0iPg6f May 23, 2023 at 03:52AM
@Above_Consensus @ZHP94585808 @HeroDividend @theDividendKid https://t.co/dJhbHW8qA7 May 23, 2023 at 02:46AM
@Above_Consensus @ZHP94585808 @HeroDividend @theDividendKid Well, you do have to have earnings before you can have dividends 😏 May 23, 2023 at 02:40AM
@Will_Young26 @ZHP94585808 It has happened 30 times now May 23, 2023 at 02:37AM
@mikepat711 um, we don't choose the order, it is based on interest among traders. May 23, 2023 at 02:36AM
@ZHP94585808 ❤️ May 23, 2023 at 02:34AM
RT @ZHP94585808: @eWhispers Best twitter acct period May 23, 2023 at 02:34AM
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @eWhispers. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 6
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 6
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@eWhispers named 6 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 7 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Earnings Whispers” (@eWhispers), 520 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eWhispers.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.