Channel
@eTon_PL
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
157subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 24 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002226315276 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @eTon_PL |
| Description | eTon - unique token from the Token 69 project. It is a mechanism in the chain of the staking system Kanał od Token 69 https://www.token69.me/ |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 24 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/eTon_PL |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 13:15 | 157 | no change |
| 24 Aug 2026, 13:01 | 157 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
74 reactions across 19 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 29 | 39.2% | |
| ❤ | 6 | 8.11% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 8.11% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 5.41% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 4.05% | |
| 👻 | 3 | 4.05% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 4.05% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 2.70% | |
| 🍌 | 2 | 2.70% | |
| 🏆 | 2 | 2.70% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 2.70% | |
| 💅 | 2 | 2.70% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 2.70% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 2.70% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 2.70% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 2.70% | |
| 🌭 | 1 | 1.35% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 1.35% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 74reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 September 2025 to 23 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⚡️ In one week, TON fees will drop 6× — to just 0.00039 TON (~$0.0005) per transaction, fixed regardless of network load. 🆓 Soon after most transactions go fully feeless. Zero commission. 🪙 MTONGA
🤩2👍1
🇪🇺 The EU is trying to justify its push for more surveillance (Chat Control) and censorship (DSA) via controlled NGOs and media. AI Forensics, a Soros-funded contractor to the European Commission, is telling us that Telegram is a PROBLEM because people can discuss content from OTHER social media in PRIVATE telegram groups (see the screenshot from state-owned France24 below). 📣 The crazy narrative of this "non-govern…
🤔2👍1
💣 Russia has opened a criminal case against me for “aiding terrorism.” Each day, the authorities fabricate new pretexts to restrict Russians’ access to Telegram as they seek to suppress the right to privacy and free speech. A sad spectacle of a state afraid of its own people. 🤦♂️
👀2🕊1
Russia is restricting access to Telegram in an attempt to force its citizens to switch to a state-controlled app built for surveillance and political censorship. 8 years ago, Iran tried the same strategy — and failed. It banned Telegram on made-up pretexts, trying to force people onto a state-run alternative. Despite the ban, most Iranians still use Telegram (bypassing censorship) and prefer it to surveilled apps. …
❤2👍1
6. govern
Posted without readable text
🔥3❤🔥2🏆2👍2🍌1
✔️Liquidity pool updates token69.me
🔥6
😐 $ETON +54 %
⚡2
💎 Friends, we want to remind you that no matter how difficult it is, our project continues to operate 🫡 🤟 Yes, we understand that times are tough in $TON, we're already used to it ⚡️ Right now, you can earn money from the project in two ways: 🟣 Staking LP Token 69 (APR - 40%) https://jvault.xyz/staking/v2/stake/LP-TOKEN69 🟣 Mining ETON (APR - 200%+) https://jvault.xyz/staking/v2/stake/69-ETON ⌛ At the moment, …
❤1
Gm 💎 💱 $ETON przechodzi na system prowizyjny 👨💻Planowaliśmy to od dawna i zdecydowaliśmy się na stworzenie nowej puli z prowizją w wysokości 5%. Co to oznacza? 🟣Teraz każdy posiadacz LP będzie mógł zarobić $TON z prowizji. 🟣Zespół będzie mógł wykorzystać prowizję na wsparcie projektu. 🟣Wydobycie Etonów będzie kontynuowane, ale teraz sensowne będzie nie tylko sprzedawanie Eton, ale także dodawanie monet do puli…
👍1
😎 Token 69 📈
🔥6
Price 158 💵 Token 69 🐃 = 68 $TON 🚀
🔥6🥰2👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @eTon_PL. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“eTon 🚀” (@eTon_PL), 157 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eTon_PL.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.