Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

eFootball_Club | 𝗡.𝗘.𝗪™

@eFOOTBALL_CLUB

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

563subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001621348224
TypeChannel
Username@eFOOTBALL_CLUB
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/eFOOTBALL_CLUB

Growth

56311 Aug 2026, 02:16 — 563 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 03:47 — 563 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 02:1611 Aug 2026, 03:47
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 562–564 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 03:47563no change
11 Aug 2026, 02:16563first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 16 January 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 06s
Average length
1m 03s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

45 reactions across 16 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2044.4%
🔥1635.6%
💔48.89%
🤣36.67%
24.44%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 16 January 2025 to 21 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Nov 2025, 04:09 UTC234 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Poll

تغییر بدیم یا همین رو ادامه بدیم؟

  1. تغییر بدید50%
  2. همین و ادامه بدید خوبه50%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍3

21 Nov 2025, 04:08 UTC234 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

دوستان می‌خوایم از این به بعد چنل رو به چنل خرید و فروش تغییر بدیم نظر شما در این مورد چیه؟

👍3

28 Jan 2025, 19:15 UTC829 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

▪️لیست پوتو هایی که بوسترشون روشنه! #emr @eFOOTBALL_CLUB

🔥4

23 Jan 2025, 06:35 UTC679 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

عجب بیابونی شده این آپدیت چرا نمیاد #emr @eFOOTBALL_CLUB

🤣3🔥1

23 Jan 2025, 06:30 UTC550 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

استریک آرنا قراره اضافه بشه ولی احتمالا فقط برای کنسول میاد #emr @eFOOTBALL_CLUB

👍2

23 Jan 2025, 06:29 UTC456 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

آرامش قبل از طوفان @eFOOTBALL_CLUB

👍2

22 Jan 2025, 20:46 UTC437 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

یکی از بهترین مدافعان این فصل تازه ۱۸ ساله شد! تولدت مبارک شاهبارسی! 🎂 #emr @eFOOTBALL_CLUB

🔥3

20 Jan 2025, 09:02 UTC318 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

بررسی جوایز و ایونت ها! #emr 🌟@eFOOTBALL_CLUB🌟

👍3

19 Jan 2025, 18:29 UTC277 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

کانسپت #emr ⭐@eFOOTBALL_CLUB⭐

👍2

18 Jan 2025, 00:07 UTC271 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

هعی💔 #emr ✯ @eFOOTBALL_CLUB ✯

💔4

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @eFOOTBALL_CLUB. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

21 Nov 2025, 04:09 UTCFinal Results12 voters

تغییر بدیم یا همین رو ادامه بدیم؟

  1. تغییر بدید50%
  2. همین و ادامه بدید خوبه50%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 16 January 2025 to 21 November 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 984,824 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“eFootball_Club | 𝗡.𝗘.𝗪™” (@eFOOTBALL_CLUB), 563 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eFOOTBALL_CLUB.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.