Channel
@e2kclickscryptosignals
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
93subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001436670149 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @e2kclickscryptosignals |
| Description | cryptocurrencies trade signals |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/e2kclickscryptosignals |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:16 | 93 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:44 | 93 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 June 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 June 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
⌛️KEY TAKEAWAY This is important. Do I expect another leg down and new lows? Yes. Is it worth it to short here? No. Bottom is not in yet, but it is close imo. The moment to open shorts was some weeks ago, not now. Now it's the moment to get ready to buy when the next leg down ends. #BTC 💱copied
Don't chase green candles... Patience + Risk management= Winning trades
🐳 1,030.22 #BTC ($21,164,254) aggregated inflows to #Binance View Chart | @cryptoquant_alert
Charts remain bearish and we will probably see new lows these days. Those lows will give good buy opportunities.
Whale's still dumping...
🐳🐳🐳 5,455.67 #BTC ($112,546,569) aggregated inflows to #Binance View Chart | @cryptoquant_alert
🔰 FED CHAIR POWELL TELLS CONGRESS FED IS 'STRONGLY COMMITTED' TO BRINGING INFLATION DOWN. #USD #Gold #Bitcoin @e2kclickscryptosignal
🔰 Global Inflation Rates. @e2kclicksfx
🐳🐳 2,700.05 #BTC ($55,287,742) aggregated inflows to #Bitfinex View Chart | @cryptoquant_alert
Miners have started to dump their #Bitcoin holdings. Public miners sold more than 100% of their production in May, a massive increase from the usual 25-40%. https://t.me/e2kclickscryptosignals
Canada's Purpose #Bitcoin ETF sold +24K $BTC yesterday - that's 51% of their total holdings 🤔 https://t.me/e2kclickscryptosignals
H4 TF resistance confluence Institution selling OB + Volume + 50 EMA rejection = New low incoming... https://t.me/e2kclickscryptosignals
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @e2kclickscryptosignals. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 622,224 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@e2kclickscryptosignals named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“E2kclicks CRYPTOSIGNALS” (@e2kclickscryptosignals), 93 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/e2kclickscryptosignals.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.