我看这卡婊的股票还要涨.jpg

Channel
布里吉斯
@e1cf53485f904e2e84034d45149e717c
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
623subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001734380208 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @e1cf53485f904e2e84034d45149e717c |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/e1cf53485f904e2e84034d45149e717c |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 06:16 | 623 | +1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:43 | 622 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 20:54 | 623 | +5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:55 | 618 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 06:49 | 619 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:33 | 622 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:39 | 622 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
https://www.bilibili.com/video/av117044754257409?p=1
https://toska.bearblog.dev/re-online-friends-are-real-friends/
本来想写一下蜘蛛侠的影评的,但是感觉有点卡手,可能还得酝酿一下
我至今都很怀念 Arc 浏览器的很多功能:网页窗口全屏,过期自动关闭标签页…… 现今就没有任何浏览器能提供一模一样完整的功能。
有时候面对着现在的一些内容趋势,比如充满着只有一段话的自然段的文章,看着就只能摇摇头走开。但这也是用户和创作者的双向选择:创作者希望内容传播度更高,就会选择更易阅读、更能调动情绪的形式;用户发觉自身注意力是一段 currency 的情况下,只能被迫在极短时间内筛选内容。 这导致的一个结果是,公众号变得需要「运营」、做短视频需要「方法论」,甚至出现了「注意力经济」这样的名词。时间一长,创作者和消费者都会不自觉地变成一只「斯金纳的鸽子」。创作者在尝试如何才能获得数据增长;消费者在尝试如何「把号养好」。 但是这样一个双方博弈的场面,显然不是一个正常的情况。好内容永远是稀缺的,但是将好数据和好内容划上等号,甚至以此作为方法论设计一个又一个的 skill,永远都是在刻舟求剑。
布里吉斯 pinned a photo
复活了公众号。虽然我更推荐你使用 RSS 订阅,但如果你想的话,现在有公众号了。
Photo, posted without a caption
华为组个好点的 PR 吧
Demo 玩得我想哭
我真的觉得我很久没有看过一个节奏正确、引人入胜的新电影了,这是这段时间的第一部。虽然我对着一个商业片说这种话有点奇怪,但我觉得在当前电影行业普遍网剧化的当下,这应该是对这部电影最大的褒奖。你很明显能看得出这就是电影原教旨主义者的作品。而且它所谈论的东西我觉得也开始从个人英雄主义开始有了一些松动,你可以说在某种程度上在迎合市场,但我觉得按论迹不论心的理论来说的话,确实可以鼓励一些需要帮助的人向他人倾诉。 总之就是,真的还可以.jpg
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @e1cf53485f904e2e84034d45149e717c. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“布里吉斯” (@e1cf53485f904e2e84034d45149e717c), 623 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/e1cf53485f904e2e84034d45149e717c.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.